Abstract
Enlarging the Window of Insider Knowledge focuses on storytelling and narrative, the framework in which a story resides. The chapter demonstrates how the success of the critical pedagogy activity can be understood through research using a dialogical narrative analysis. The success of critical pedagogy is dependent on the extent it results in conscientization, so that concept is reviewed in more detail. The discussion includes an analysis of the transformation the participants underwent by virtue of engaging in the production and analysis of visual stories as members of a critical pedagogy course. Concepts such as emplotment and interpellation are used as lenses to focus the reader’s understanding of just how an emergence occurred on the part of the participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Chase, S. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 651–680). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crocker, S. (2003). The fogo process: Participatory communication in a globalizing world. In S. White (Ed.), Participatory video: Images that transform and empower (pp. 122–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2009). The critical pedagogy reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2002). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frank, A. W. (2005). What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research, 15(7), 964–974.
Frank, A. W. (2010). Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International.
Freire, P., & Shor, I. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching. Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–32.
Landman, T. (2012). Phronesis and narrative analysis. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science: Applied phronesis (pp. 27–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maton, K. (2008). Habitus. In E. B. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 49–65). Stocksfield: Acumen.
Mattingly, C. (1991). The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(11), 998–1005.
Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahman, M. A. (1991). The theoretical standpoint of PAR. In O. Fals-Borda & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research (pp. 13–23). New York: Apex Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, G. (2018). Enlarging the Window of Insider Knowledge. In: Movie Making as Critical Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96926-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96926-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96925-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96926-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)