Abstract
Economic history is an interdisciplinary field that fuses economics with history, two disciplines that often misunderstand one another. This chapter bridges these two disciplines by discussing archetypical approaches and research strategies in each. The authors contrast the differences between deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning in scholarly enquiry. They conclude with a call for consideration to (historical) context when conducting research in economics and economic history.
We thank graduate students at Queen’s University Belfast for the lively seminar discussion that underpins this chapter, and Graham Brownlow, Rob Gilles and Tom Hulme for comments on an earlier draft.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Anyway, it did occur in France, and just a few short decades later than England.
- 2.
What we have in mind here is a Humean/Popperian rather than a classical understanding of induction—one in which falsification plays a central role. See Thornton (2017).
- 3.
Our characterisations of bad economics and bad history are perhaps a little unfair on practitioners of these disciplines. But we think there is merit in attacking straw men because they can provide clean and clear models of what to avoid. For a famous example of this rhetorical approach, see the way in which John Maynard Keynes uses “Professor Pigou” (Arthur Cecil Pigou) as a straw man “orthodox economist” throughout his General Theory (1936).
- 4.
Deirdre McCloskey (2018) makes a somewhat similar argument.
- 5.
Graham Brownlow, our colleague, argues that a better term for stylised facts is “stylised fictions”.
- 6.
Our advice to students visiting archives is to bring a good, simple, pencil. It has to look like a pencil (please, no mechanical pencils!). It cannot have an integrated eraser. Failure to follow this advice will usually result in an archivist confiscating your writing materials.
- 7.
Perhaps even too much context!
- 8.
This famous line comes from LP. Hartley’s 1953 novel, The Go-Between.
- 9.
Do not let economists tell you otherwise because they are the ones who are probably being delusional about theory, not you!
- 10.
Walt Rostow (1960) is perhaps one of the most well-known exponents of this logic.
- 11.
Reciprocal comparison encapsulates pretty well the important lessons of “hermeneutics”, the philosophy of understanding.
Reading List
Austin, Gareth. 2017. Three Revolutions in Economic History. Inaugural Lecture, University of Cambridge, 20 October 2017. http://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/podcast-austin.html.
Crafts, Nicholas. 1977. Industrial Revolution in England and France: Some Thoughts on the Question, “Why was England First?”. Economic History Review 30 (3): 429–441.
Douven, Igor. 2017. Abduction. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017 Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1979. Clues: Roots of a Scientific Paradigm. Theory and Society 7 (3): 273–288.
Hartley, L.P. (1953) 2002. The Go-Between. New York: The New York Review of Books.
Hawthorne, James. 2018. Inductive Logic. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2018 Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1936) 2018. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Landes, David S. 1994. What Room for Accident in History?: Explaining Big Changes by Small Events. Economic History Review 47 (4): 637–656.
Lucassen, Jan. 2007. Wages and Currency: Global Comparisons from Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. New York: Peter Lang.
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2018. Economic History as Humanomics, the Scientific Branch of Economics. Paper presented to the Allied Social Science Association Annual Meeting 2018, Philadelphia. http://deirdremccloskey.com/docs/pdf/McCloskey_EconomicHistoryEssayASSA2018.pdf.
Mullins, Phil. 2002. Peirce’s Abduction and Polanyi’s Tacit Knowing. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (3): 198–224.
Rostow, Walt W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornton, Stephen. 2017. Karl Popper. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2018 Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colvin, C.L., Wagenaar, H. (2018). Economics Versus History. In: Blum, M., Colvin, C. (eds) An Economist’s Guide to Economic History. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96568-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96568-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96567-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96568-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)