Abstract
Inventive Design is a research field born on the basis that TRIZ body of knowledge was both promising and original, but also containing inconsistencies that only an in-depth scientific work achieved by a community of researchers could handle for its evolution. Amongst the techniques used by TRIZ community, Altshuller’s Contradiction Matrix combined with the 40 Inventive Principles that appears as a flagship for newcomers and observers. This rather old tool from Altshuller has undergone many researches and a large quantity of evolutions have been proposed for its rebuilding. Nevertheless, after several attempt of practices, two major drawbacks in its use still appears to engineers. The first one is when associating contradiction’s parameters to one or several of the 39 Generic Engineering Parameters, the second is to interpret the resulting Inventive Principles appearing in the cells of the Contradiction Matrix. These two potential reasons of inefficiencies are known to TRIZ world, but only few proposals have been made by researches in the community to cope with these drawbacks. This paper proposes to report about the use of Case-based Reasoning (CBR) associated to semantic similarity algorithms as a means to directly place users in front of a set of eligible solutions when trying to solve a contradiction, therefore avoiding the use of the Contradiction Matrix. Our research has now reached a milestone since we have developed an online web-application associated with a database and a case base for testing the inventive problem-solving environment with users and compare it with classical use of the matrix. We also summarize the architecture of our methodology and illustrate it with a case study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al’tshuller GS, Shulyak L, Rodman S (1999) The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA
A brief history of TRIZ - Recherche Google
Ilevbare IM, Probert D, Phaal R (2013) A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation 33(2–3):30–37
Zhang P, Farhat A, Zanni-Merk C, Cavallucci D (2017) Case-based reasoning for knowledge capitalization in inventive design using latent semantic analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 112:323–332
Mann D, Dewulf S, Zlotin B, Zusman A (2003) Matrix 2003: updating the TRIZ contradiction matrix. CREAX press, Ieper, Belgium
Sheu DD, Chen C-H, Yu P-Y (2012) Invention principles and contradiction matrix for semiconductor manufacturing industry: chemical mechanical polishing. J Intell Manuf 23(5):1637–1648
Mann D (2011) Natural world contradiction matrix: how biological systems resolve trade-offs and compromises. Procedia Eng 9:714–723
Coelho DA (2009) Matching TRIZ engineering parameters to human factors issues in manufacturing. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ 6(11):547–556
Yan W, Zanni-Merk C, Rousselot F, Cavallucci D (2015) A method for facilitating inventive design based on semantic similarity and case-based reasoning. Procedia Eng 131:194–203
Litvin S (2004) New TRIZ-based tool—function-oriented search (FOS). In: TRIZ future conference: Florence, 3–5 November, pp 505–508
Negny S, Riesco H, Le Lann J-M (2010) Effective retrieval and new indexing method for case based reasoning: application in chemical process design. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23(6):880–894
Cortes Robles G, Negny S, Le Lann J (2004) Knowledge management and TRIZ: a model for knowledge capitalization and innovation. In: World conference: TRIZ future, Florence
Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun 7(1):39–59
Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391
Zhang P, Zanni-Merk C, Cavallucci D (2017) Latent semantic indexing for capitalizing experience in inventive design. In: International conference on sustainable design and manufacturing. Springer, Cham, pp 37–47
Richter MM, Weber R (2013) Case-based reasoning: a textbook. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Hu Z, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Xiang D (2011) An improved TRIZ-CBR model for rapidly innovative design. Adv Mater Res 308–310:126–131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, P., Ghabri, S., Cavallucci, D., Zanni-Merk, C. (2018). Can Altshuller’s Matrix Be Skipped Using CBR and Semantic Similarity Reasoning?. In: Koziołek, S., Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds) Advances and Impacts of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96532-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96532-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96531-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96532-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)