Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

True and False Intentions: A Science of Lies About the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication

  • 3565 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the bourgeoning field of true and false intentions. A statement of true intent refers to a future action which a speaker intends to carry out, while a statement of false intent refers to a future action which a speaker claims, but does not intend to carry out. An ability to distinguish between such statements holds great practical value for a myriad of professions. Despite this practical value, the topic of true and false intentions has largely been ignored by researchers, who typically focus on judging the veracity of statements concerning past events. The chapter defines key terms in the field, summarizes the extant research, and highlights recent theoretical developments and areas for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agosta, S., Castiello, U., Rigoni, D., Lionetti, S., & Sartori, G. (2011). The detection and the neural correlates of behavioral (prior) intentions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,23(12), 3888–3902. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 438–459). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1969). The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,5(4), 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ask, K., Granhag, P. A., Juhlin, F., & Vrij, A. (2013). Intending or pretending? Automatic evaluations of goal cues discriminate true and false intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology,27(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(6), 1014–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., Jr. & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderon, S., Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Ask, K. (2018). Drawing what lies ahead: False intentions are more abstractly depicted than true intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2011). Eliciting cues to false intent. Law and Human Behavior,35(6), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9258-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2007). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,4(3), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2009). How do people evaluate objects? A brief review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,3(1), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin,129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(6), 1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50(2), 229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, E., McGuire, M., Langben, S., & Blandón-Gitlin, I. (2015). A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions. Frontiers in Psychology,6, 1298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. J. (2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(4), 596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87(5), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnish college gunman kills 10. (2008). BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk.

  • Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review,11(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307303029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist,54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(1), 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A. (2010). On the psycho-legal study of true and false intentions: Dangerous waters and some stepping stones. The Open Criminology Journal,3, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003010037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: New challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 231–251). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A., & Knieps, M. (2011). Episodic future thought: Illuminating the trademarks of forming true and false intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A., & Mac Giolla, E. (2014). Preventing future crimes: Identifying markers of true and false intent. European Psychologist,19(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior,30(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013a). Back to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. The Journal of Psychology,147(6), 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.728542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013b). Repeated visits to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. International Journal of Advances in Psychology,2(2), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2014). Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology,5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGaw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Giolla, E. (2016). Towards a theory of true and false intentions. (Doctoral thesis), Departement of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/43237/1/gupea_2077_43237_1.pdf.

  • Mac Giolla, E., & Granhag, P. A. (2015). Detecting false intent amongst small cells of suspects: Single versus repeated interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,12, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Ask, K. (2017a). A goal-activation framework of true and false intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology,31, 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Ask, K. (2017b). Task-related spontaneous thought: A novel direction in the study of true and false intentions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,6(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Liu-Jönsson, M. (2013). Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent. PsyCh Journal,2(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2015). Discriminating between true and false intentions. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches (pp. 155–173). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,33(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 45–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Warmelink, L., & Forrester, D. (2012). Windows to the soul? Deliberate eye contact as a cue to deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-012-0132-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., Vrij, A., Nasholm, E., Warmelink, L., Leal, S., & Forrester, D. (2012). The direction of deception: Neuro-linguistic programming as a lie detection tool. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,27(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9097-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (2009). Five markers of motivated behavior. In G. B. Moskowitz & H. Grant (Eds.), Psychology of goals. London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Detecting criminal intent with the concealed information test. Open Criminology Journal,3, 44–47. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003020044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meixner, J. B., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). A mock terrorism application of the P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology,48(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01050.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, G. B. (2002). Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,38(4), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology,5(3), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidis, I., Eberhardt, N. L., & Levine, J. A. (2002). Human behaviour: Seeing through the face of deception. Nature, 415(6867), 35. https://doi.org/10.1038/415035a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., & Mazzeri, L. (1988). A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience,42(1–2), 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychological Science,19(8), 772–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1124(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology,25(1), 545–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooniste, T. (2015). Discriminating between true and false intentions: Questions to pose and cues to use. (Doctoral thesis), Departement of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/38724.

  • Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (2013). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime & Law,19(8), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2013.793333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2016). Discriminating between true and false intent among cells of suspects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. A., Farrow, T. F., Herford, A. E., Wilkinson, I. D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P. W. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. NeuroReport,12(13), 2849–2853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32(11), 1446–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & De Houwer, J. (2013). Reaction time measures in deception research: Comparing the effects of irrelevant and relevant stimulus–response compatibility. Acta Psychologica,144(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought an emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trovillo, P. V. (1939). A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931–1951),29, 848–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2013). Spatial and temporal details in intentions: A cue to detecting deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology,27(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica,141(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., Forrester, D., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports. Law and Human Behavior,35(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9251-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Meijer, E. (2011). Memory detection: Theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere, B., & Meijer, E. H. (2014). What’s on your mind? Detecting concealed information. European Psychologist,19, 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 205–229). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,1(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Lying about flying: The first experiment to detect false intent. Psychology, Crime & Law,17(7), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903418213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2011). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangrossi, A., Agosta, S., Cervesato, G., Tessarotto, F., & Sartori, G. (2015). “I didn’t want to do it!” The detection of past intentions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeigarnik, B. (1939). On finished and unfinished tasks. In E. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published in 1927).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Eric Mac Giolla & Pär Anders Granhag

  2. Norwegian Police University College, Oslo, Norway

    Pär Anders Granhag

Authors
  1. Eric Mac Giolla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pär Anders Granhag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Mac Giolla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Studies, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA

    Tony Docan-Morgan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P.A. (2019). True and False Intentions: A Science of Lies About the Future. In: Docan-Morgan, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation