Skip to main content

Social Mapping of Perceived Ecosystem Service Risks: Some Thoughts from a Belgian Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ecosystem Services

Abstract

There are few examples of social (or stakeholder-based) mapping of ecosystem services risks. For ecosystem services in general, mapping risks to ecosystem services supply is mainly based on geodatabases on land use, land cover, biophysical, or abiotic features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Menzie CA, Deardorff T, Booth P, Wickwire T. Refocusing on nature: Holistic assessment of ecosystem services. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012;8:401–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Vreese R, Leys M, Fontaine CM, Dendoncker N. Social mapping of perceived ecosystem services supply–the role of social landscape metrics and social hotspots for integrated ecosystem services assessment, landscape planning and management. Ecol Indic. 2016;66:517–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Vreese R, Leys M, Dendoncker N, Van Herzele A, Fontaine CM. Images of nature as a boundary object in social and integrated ecosystem services assessments. Reflections from a Belgian case study. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22(B):269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, MacDonald DH. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;97:111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raymond CM, Brown G. Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning. Clim Chang. 2011;104:653–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bastian O. The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indic. 2013;24:12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown G, Fagerholm N. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst Serv. 2015;13:119–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lechner AM, Raymond CM, Adams VM, Polyakov M, Gordon A, Rhodes JR, et al. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning. Conserv Biol. 2014;28:1497–511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Vreese, R. (2019). Social Mapping of Perceived Ecosystem Service Risks: Some Thoughts from a Belgian Case Study. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics