Skip to main content

Supporting Professional Transitions in Innovative Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our work focuses on the professional transitions required to address the issues and meet the challenges of sustainable development. We see sustainable development as something that has to be thought out, especially in terms of work activities (to the extent that there will be no sustainability without workers being able to implement it in their work). After having indicated the depth of the changes requested and the corresponding design regime, we make two proposals that are intended to support the professional transitions required by the transition to more sustainable forms of production: namely (i) the implementation of a step-by-step design, and (ii) the creation of a work observatory whose operating methods are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that this distinction between regulated design and innovative design can be mobilised from a perspective that calls for the generalization of innovative design as a response to the economic challenges of innovation (see e.g. [14]). From our point of view, innovative design consists in dealing with a change of “technical paradigm” in Constant’s sense (see in this respect [15]).

References

  1. Gazier B (2005) Marchés transitionnels du travail et restructurations: vers une gestion collective des transitions. La Revue de l’Ires 1(47):301–317. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdli.047.0301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moreau MA (2006) Normes sociales, droit du travail et mondialisation: confrontations et mutations. Dalloz, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mathieu C, Sterdyniack H (2008) Le modèle social européen et l’Europe sociale. Revue de l’OFCE 1(104):43–103. https://doi.org/10.3917/reof.104.0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniellou F (2005) The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: cross influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 6(5):409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Béguin P (2007) Taking activity into account during the design process. @ctivités 4(2):115–121. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1727, https://journals.openedition.org/activites/1727

  6. Rabardel P, Béguin P (2005) Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 6(5):429–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Béguin P, Pueyo V (2011) Quelle place au travail des agriculteurs dans la fabrication d’une agriculture durable. Pistes 13(1). http://www.pistes.uqam.ca/v13n1/articles/v13n1a1.htm

  8. Béguin P, Coutarel L, Prost L (2011) Conduire des projets innovants dans les BAC Grenelle pour réduire les risques environnementaux. In: 46ème Congrès de la SELF. L’ergonomie à la croisée des risques, Paris, 14–16 September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boudra L, Béguin P (2014) Analyzing territorial governance to prevent occupational risks in the sector of waste management. In: Broberg, et al (eds) Ergonomics challenges in the new economy. Proceeding of the 11th international symposium on human factors in organisational design and management and 46th annual nordic ergonomics society conference, pp 115–120, 17–20 August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gotteland C, Rosier A, Pueyo V, Béguin P (2015) Supporting energy transitions. Project management as a learning device and accompanying professional transitions. In: Proceedings 19th triennial congress of the IEA, Melbourne, pp 435–439, 9–14 August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norman DA (1992) Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Addison Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lomov BF (1977) O putyakh postroeniya teorii inzhenernoj psikhologii na osnove sistemnogo podkhoda. In: Lomov BF, Rubakhin VF, Venda VF (eds) Inzhenernaya Psikhologiya (Engineering Psychology). Nauka, Moscow, pp 31–54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meynard JM, Aggeri F, Coulon JB, Habib R, Tillon JP (2006) Recherches sur la conception de systèmes agricoles innovants. Rapport INRA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A (2006) Les processus d’innovation. Conception innovante et croissance des entreprises. Hermès – Lavoisier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  15. Constant E (1973) A model for technological change applied to the turbojet revolution. Technol Cult 14:554–579

    Google Scholar 

  16. Béguin P (2010) Conduite de projet et fabrication collective du travail: une approche développementale. Document de synthèse en vue de l’habilitation à diriger des recherches. Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux 2, p 149

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaptelinin V (2005) The object of activity: making sense of the sense-maker. Mind Cult Act 12(1):4–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schön D (1988) Educating the reflexive practitionner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nardi B, Engeström Y (1999) A web on the wind: the structure of invisible work. Comput Support Coop Work 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008694621289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bødker S, Klokmose CN (2012) Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: making sense through design. ACM, New York, pp 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399085

  22. Foucault M (1984) Des espaces autres. Architecture Mouvement Continuité 5:46–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valérie Pueyo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pueyo, V., Béguin, P. (2019). Supporting Professional Transitions in Innovative Projects. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_204

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics