Skip to main content

Capital Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analytical Corporate Finance

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 119k Accesses

Abstract

The capital structure of a company is the founding stone for the daily development of its operation and for an adequate planning of the business. It says in fact how many resources are available and where they come from.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cleary S (1999) The relationship between firm investment and financial status. J Financ 54(2):673–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley CW, Schall LD (1979) The theory of financial decision. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. J Account Econ 31(1–3):405–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MH (1977) Debt and taxes. J Financ 32(2):261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Miller MH (1958) The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48:261–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Miller MH (1963) Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. Am Econ Rev 53:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Financ 39(3):575–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC (2001) Capital structure. J Econ Perspect 15:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13:187–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1969) A re-examination of the Modigliani-Miller theorem. Am Econ Rev 59:784–793

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wijst N, Thurik R (1993) Determinants of small firm debt ratios: an analysis of retail panel data. Small Bus Econ 5(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Problems

  1. 1.

    Tecom LTD is an all equity firm with a current market value of €750,000,000 and will be worth €600,000,000 or €900,000,000 in 1 year. The risk-free interest rate is 3%. Suppose Tecom LTD issues zero-coupon, 1-year debt with a face value of €850,000 and uses the proceeds to pay a special dividend to shareholders. Assuming perfect capital markets, use the binomial model to answer the following:

    1. (a)

      What are the payoffs of the firm’s debt in 1 year?

    2. (b)

      What is the value today of the debt today?

    3. (c)

      What is the yield on the debt?

  2. 2.

    Given the company and the number in Exercise 1:

    1. (a)

      According to the Modigliani–Miller theory, what is the value of the equity before the dividend is paid?

    2. (b)

      What is the value of equity just after the dividend is paid?

  3. 3.

    Media Corp. has planned free cash flow in the coming year of €18,000,000, expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year perpetually, afterward. Media Corp. has a cost of equity of 16%, a cost of debt of 7%, and corporate tax rate of 38%. The debt to equity ratio is 0.65. What is the value of Flagstaff as an all equity firm?

  4. 4.

    Rina Industries is an all-equity firm with 65,000,000 shares outstanding and €180,000,000 in cash. The firm expects future free cash flows of €68,000,000 per year. Money can be used to expand the business and increase the expected future free cash flows by 12%. The cost of capital is 10%, and capital markets are perfect. An alternative strategy is to use the €200,000,000 to repurchase shares instead of funding the expansion. If you were advising the board:

    1. (a)

      What course of action would you recommend, expansion or repurchase?

    2. (b)

      Which provides the higher stock price?

  5. 5.

    According to Modigliani and Miller, what is the significance of a company’s capital structure? How did they come to this conclusion?

  6. 6.

    According to the trade-off theory:

    1. (a)

      What is traded off against what in the trade-off theory?

    2. (b)

      When is optimal capital structure reached? Be precise in your answer.

  7. 7.

    For each of the four characteristics below, does the trade-off theory predict that it will lead to more or less debt in optimal capital structure, other things equal?

    1. (a)

      Selling durables that need future maintenance and repair

    2. (b)

      Having very volatile earnings

  8. 8.

    Firms can change their capital structures with stock repurchases and with equity offerings.

    1. (a)

      What does the trade-off theory of optimal capital structure predict about the effect on the value of the firm of stock repurchases, will the value go up or down?

    2. (b)

      What does the trade-off theory of optimal capital structure predict about the effect on the value of the firm of equity offerings, will the value go up or down?

  9. 9.

    The trade-off theory and the pecking order theory both explain firms’ capital structures as a function of firms’ characteristics. The table below lists a number of empirical proxy variables that are often used to test these theories. Complete the table below by writing “+,” “–,” or “0” in the columns behind each variable, depending on whether the theory predicts it is associated with more (+) or less (−) debt in capital structure or 0 if the theory does not predict anything regarding this variable.

Proxy variable

Trade-off theory

Pecking order theory

Depreciation/total costs

  

Return on equity

  

Standard deviation of stock returns

  

Fixed-to-total assets

  

Market-to-book value

  

R&D expenses-to-total costs

  

Size (total assets)

  
  1. 10.

    Two companies A and B have the same assets that produce the same perpetual cash flow of €10 million. Both companies have 16,000,000 shares outstanding. Company A has outstanding debt with a value of €18,000,000 and current price of shares €8, for an annual return of 11.5%. Company B has outstanding debt with a value of €80,000,000. All debt is risk-free and the risk-free interest rate is 5%. Assume a Modigliani–Miller world without taxes.

    1. (a)

      Calculate the value of the assets of company A. Use an alternative calculation to check your results.

    2. (b)

      Calculate the price and return of the shares of company B. Check your results.

  2. 11.

    Arko LTD has generated a considerable amount of cash and it now wants to pay out €15 million of it to its shareholders. Its balance sheet is depicted below. Arko LTD has 15,000,000 shares outstanding. Assume no taxes and transaction costs.

Balance sheet of Arko LTD (€M)

Cash

20

Debt

25

Other assets

80

Equity

75

Total

100

Total

100

  1. (a)

    Calculate the value per share after Arko LTD has paid out €7,000,000 dividends to its shareholders and demonstrate that this does not affect the wealth of the shareholders.

  2. (b)

    Calculate the value per share after Arko LTD has used €7,000,000 to buy back its shares and demonstrate that this does not affect the wealth of the shareholders.

  3. (c)

    Describe under which circumstances the management of Arko LTD would prefer buying back shares instead of paying cash dividends.

Appendix: Risk-Adjusted Return on Capital

The risk-adjusted return on capital (RAROC) is a risk-adjusted performance measurement tool, which has become important in assessing the profitability of business units.

Generally, risk adjustments compare return with capital employed in a way to incorporate an adjustment for the risk involved in the business, therefore taking in account the fact that the metrics is affected by uncertainty . RAROC is the ratio of adjusted income over economic capital:

\( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\mathrm{RAROC}=\frac{R-C-{E}_L}{E_C}\\ {}\kern3.25em =\frac{A_{\mathrm{NI}}}{E_C}\end{array}} \)

where:

R is the amount of revenues.

C is the amount of costs.

EL is the expected loss.

EC is the economic capital.

ANI is the adjusted net income.

For a bank issuing a loan, the numerator of RAROC measure for that loan will look like

ANI = I − EL − CO

where:

I is the financial income.

CO is the amount of operating costs.

Assuming τ is the corporate tax rate, a step further consists in multiplying the amount obtained by (1 − τ), in order to get the post-tax RAROC measure.

A further degree of complication can be added by multiplying the economic capital by a compounding factor obtained from the risk-free rate. The amount obtained is added to the numerator of RAROC equation.

RAROC can be related to CAPM analysis in order to capture the relationship with the hurdle rate. Recall CAPM equation to be

Ri = Rf + βi(Rm − Rf)and

\( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\beta}_i=\frac{\sigma_{im}}{\sigma_m^2}\\ {}\kern0.75em =\frac{\rho_{im}{\sigma}_i{\sigma}_m}{\sigma_m^2}\\ {}\kern0.75em =\frac{\rho_{im}{\sigma}_i}{\sigma_m}\end{array}} \)

The CAPM equation becomes

\( {R}_i={R}_f+\frac{\rho_{im}{\sigma}_i}{\sigma_m}\left({R}_m-{R}_f\right) \) from which

\( {R}_i-{R}_f=\frac{\rho_{im}{\sigma}_i}{\sigma_m}\left({R}_m-{R}_f\right) \) and

\( \frac{R_i-{R}_f}{\rho_{im}{\sigma}_i}=\frac{R_m-{R}_f}{\sigma_m} \)

The equation sets an important equivalence for the asset i in the portfolio. The left-hand side is the RAROC of the asset, while the right-hand side is the hurdle rate on the asset. The two are equal.

Case Study: Capital Structure

7.1.1 Payoux Ltd

7.1.1.1 The Case

A company shows the following financial information:

  • FCFF for next year = 25,000,000

  • Tax rate  = 30%

  • Debt = 100,000,000

  • Cost of debt = 5%

  • Unlevered cost of capital = 10%

Payoux is a company active in the industry of recycling. Established in 1992, it is still one of the oldest and biggest companies in the field, and employees have a good share of the people living in the nearby village.

Management has always been concerned about managing the company properly, due to the heavy social impact that distress may have on the local population, as well as for the contagion to the partner companies.

The company is quoted on the regulated exchange, and the share price has been stable to the current price of $50 in the last months. Expectations are bullish on the stock due to recent expansion and increase in the amount invested in modern recycling methods.

One of the main concerns of the managers is the riskiness of the capital of the company and how this can impact on the perception of the investors. It is therefore important in their opinion to run an analysis of the capital structure and current cost of capital.

On top of that, the company has current extra cash of $2,000,000 to be fully distributed to the shareholders. The management has to decide which payout policy to apply in the current year, dividends, or share repurchases.

The company is planned to generate, starting from the following year, an average stable amount of extra cash to be distributed to shareholders, in the order of $3,000,000 per year. The outstanding shares are 1,000,000.

The price of a stock is currently $50 and supposed to reach a price of $55 1 year from now. There is another stock on the market that currently costs $100 and supposed to reach a price of $108 1 year from now, after paying a dividend of $2 right before the end of the 1-year period. Taxes on dividends are 25%, and taxes on capital gains are 12%. Assume you want to invest in (buy) one of the two stocks and sell it back after the 1-year period.

7.1.1.2 Questions

  1. 1.

    What is the debt-to-equity ratio of the firm?

  2. 2.

    What is the WACC (MM second case) of the firm?

  3. 3.

    How should the capital structure change to support that increase?

  4. 4.

    Show that according to the MM theory of dividends (irrelevance), the choice between dividends and shares repurchase is irrelevant, at the current cost of capital.

  5. 5.

    Which stock would you invest in, if you believe in the irrelevance theory of dividends? Show calculations.

  6. 6.

    Which stock would you invest in, if you believe in the tax-preference theory of dividends? Show calculations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corelli, A. (2018). Capital Structure. In: Analytical Corporate Finance. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95762-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics