Skip to main content

Toward Edge-based Caching in Software-defined Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fog Computing

Abstract

Considerable technological advancements and pervasive use of smart connected vehicles have highlighted the true potential of vehicular networks, which, in the realm of smart cities, assists in improvement of road safety and traffic management and efficiency. Coupled with this is the massive innovation realized in wireless networking technologies, and today, heterogeneous networks encompassing 4G LTE , Wi-Fi, WiMAX , DSRC, and Terahertz communication are taking shape, synergy of which not only promises higher bandwidth but also ensures low latent infrastructure critical for supporting diverse range of safety applications. Heterogeneity, on the other hand, has introduced new challenges too, e.g., in terms of network fragmentation, an unbalanced traffic flow in a multi-path topology, and inefficient utilization of network resources. Accordingly, the emerging yet promising paradigm of software-defined networking (SDN ) has, of lately, been introduced to vehicular networks for addressing such bottlenecks, which through its logically centralized control ensures programmability, scalability, elasticity, and agility. Nevertheless, a centralized control in a distributed environment like vehicular networks could become a single point of network failure and may also result in significant network management overhead in case of extremely dense traffic scenarios. Therefore, leveraging edge-based caching in heterogeneous vehicular networks is indispensable. This chapter brings forward the notion of SDN-based heterogeneous vehicular networking and argues that edge-based caching can help overcome the bottlenecks posed by traditional networking architectures especially in terms of ensuring low latency for safety-critical applications. Finally, open challenges and probable solutions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other passive safety measures include provision of airbags and enhancements in physical structure of cars.

  2. 2.

    VSC-A consortium member includes Ford Motors, General Motors Corporation, Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc., Honda R&D Americas, Inc., and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.

  3. 3.

    Vehicle platooning aims to significantly minimize the inter-vehicular distances in contrast to inter-vehicular distances recommended for manual driving, by partially or fully automating the driving tasks, and with the main intent of effectively utilizing the road infrastructure by facilitating more number of vehicles for utilizing any stretch of the road. Hence, the smaller the inter-vehicular distance is, the more the number of vehicles could be packed, which subsequently leads to reduction in the aerodynamic drag thereby enhancing energy efficiency.

  4. 4.

    The notion of vehicular clouds is similar to that of vehicular platoons as vehicles with similar objectives (or interests) form a collaborative group and communication is being done via the cloud head, schemes for whose selection is similar to that of cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks.

References

  1. Zheng K, Zheng Q, Chatzimisios P, Xiang W, Zhou Y (2015) Heterogeneous vehicular networking: a survey on architecture challenges, and solutions. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 17(4):2377–2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang S, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Wang L, Yang J, Wang W (2017) A survey on mobile edge networks: convergence of computing caching and communications. IEEE Access 5:6757–6779. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2685434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dey KC, Rayamajhi A, Chowdhury M, Bhavsar P, Martin J (2016) Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (v2i) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network—performance evaluation. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 68:168–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camacho F, Cárdenas C, Muñoz D (2018) Emerging technologies and research challenges for intelligent transportation systems: 5G, HetNets, and, Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 12(1):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0391-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azizian M, Cherkaoui S, Hafid AS (2017) Vehicle software updates distribution with and cloud computing. IEEE Commun Mag 55(8):74–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1601161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontes RDR, Campolo C, Rothenberg CE, Molinaro A (2017) From theory to experimental evaluation: resource management in software-defined vehicular networks. IEEE Access 5:3069–3076. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2671030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GPP (2015) Third generation partnership project; technical specification group services and system aspects; study on LTE support for vehicle to everything (V2X) services, 3GPP TR 22.885 V14.0.0 (Technical Report)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choi J, Va V, Gonzalez-Prelcic N, Daniels R, Bhat CR, Heath RW (2016) Millimeter-wave vehicular communication to support massive automotive sensing. IEEE Commun Mag 54(12):160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson P (2016) just one autonomous car will use 4,000 GB of Data/Day. network world. Available Online at: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3147892/internet/one-autonomous-car-will-use-4000gb-of-dataday.html. Accessed 5 Mar 2018

  10. Zheng X et al (2016) Big data for social transportation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(3):620–630. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2015.2480157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joerer S (2016) Improving intersection safety with inter-vehicular communication, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng K, Hou L, Zheng Q, Lu N, Lei L (2016) Soft-defined heterogeneous vehicular network: architecture and challenges. IEEE Netw 30(4):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2016.7513867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ETSI (2010) Intelligent transport system (ITS); communication architecture, ETSI EN 302 665 V1.1.1 (European Standard Telecommunication Series)

    Google Scholar 

  14. USDoT, 2013, Concept of Operations for Road Weather Connected Vehicle Applications, U.S. Department of Transportation’s Technical Report (FHWA-JPO-13-047)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng K, Zheng Q, Yang H, Zhao L, Chatzimisios P (2015) Reliable and efficient autonomous driving: the need for heterogeneous vehicular networks. IEEE Commun Mag 53(12):72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Araniti G, Campolo C, Condoluci M, Iera A, Molinaro A (2013) LTE for vehicular networking: a survey. IEEE Commun Mag 51(5):148–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2013.6515060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seo H, Lee KD, Yasukawa S, Peng Y, Sartori P (2016) LTE evolution for vehicle-to-everything services. IEEE Commun Mag 54(6):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2016.7497762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bergenhem C, Huang Q, Benmimoun A, Robinson T (2010) Challenges of platooning on public motorways, 17th ITS world congress. Busan, Korea, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. NHTSA (2011) Vehicles safety communications—applications (VSC-A), Final Report, U.S. Department of transportation national highway traffic safety administration’s report (DOT HS 811 492A)

    Google Scholar 

  20. C2C-CC (2015) Co-operative road traffic—foresight, safety, and comfort, The CAR 2 CAR communication consortium status report

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davila A, Aramburu E, Freixas A (2013) Making the best out of aerodynamics: platoons, Society of automotive engineering (SAE International) Technical Paper 2013- 01-0767

    Google Scholar 

  22. NHTSA (2014) Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) notice of availability of technical report. Fed Reg 79(161):49270–49278

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu W et al (2018) In big data era. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sinica 5(1):19–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/jas.2017.7510736

  24. Wu Y, Guo W, Yuan H, Li L, Wang S, Chu X, Zhang J (2016) Device-to-device meets lte-unlicensed. IEEE Commun Mag 54(5):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2016.7470950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun S-H, Hu J-L, Peng Y, Pan X-M, Zhao L, Fang J-A (2016) Support for vehicle-to-everything services based on LTE. IEEE Wirel Commun 23(3):4–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2016.7498068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mach P, Becvar Z (2017) Mobile edge computing: a survey on architecture and computation offloading. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(3):1628–1656. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2682318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 3GPP (2014) Third generation partnership project; technical specification group radio access network; study on LTE device to device proximity services; radio aspects, 3GPP TR 36.843 V12.0.1 (Technical Report)

    Google Scholar 

  28. GPP (2016) Third generation partnership project technical specification group radio access network; Study on the LTE-based V2X Services. 3GPP TR 36.885 V14.0.0 (Technical Report)

    Google Scholar 

  29. GPP (2016) Third generation partnership project; technical specification group services and system aspects; study on architecture enhancements for LTE support of V2X services. 3GPP TR 23.785 V14.0.0 (Technical Report)

    Google Scholar 

  30. GPP (2016) Third generation partnership project; technical specification group services and system aspects; feasibility study on new services and markets technology enablers. 3GPP TR 22.891 V14.2.0 (Technical Report)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mir ZH, Filali F (2014) LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation. EURASIP J Wireless Commun Networking 89:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cui X, Gulliver TA, Li J, Zhang H (2016) Vehicle positioning using 5G millimeter-wave systems. IEEE Access 4:6964–6973. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2615425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson M, Milosavljevic M, Kourtessis P, Stafford GP, Burrell MJ, Senior JM (2016) Software defined networking for heterogeneous access networks. In: 18th international conference on transparent optical networks (ICTON), Trento, Italy, pp. 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/icton.2016.7550412

  34. Aujla GS, Chaudhary R, Kumar N, Rodrigues JJPC, Vinel A (2017) Data offloading in 5g-enabled software-defined vehicular networks: a stackelberg-game-based approach. IEEE Commun Mag 55(8):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1601224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Secinti G, Canberk B, Duong TQ, Shu L (2017) Software defined architecture for: a testbed implementation with wireless access management. IEEE Commun Mag 55(7):135–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1601186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mumtaz S, Jornet JM, Aulin J, Gerstacker WH, Dong X, Ai B (2017) Terahertz communication for vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(7):5617–5625. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2017.2712878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G PPP (2015) 5G vision (the next generation of communication networks and services), The 5G infrastructure public private partnership [Available Online at: https://5g-ppp.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/5G-Vision-Brochure-v1.pdf]

  38. He Z, Cao J, Liu X (2016) SDVN: enabling rapid network innovation for heterogeneous vehicular communication. IEEE Netw 30(4):10–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2016.7513858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cui L, Yu FR, Yan Q (2016) When big data meets software-defined networking: for big data and big data for SDN. IEEE Netw 30(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2016.7389832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gai F, Zhang J, Zhu P (2017) Ratee-Based Trust Management System for. In: Ma L, Khreishah A, Zhang Y, Yan M (eds) Wireless algorithms, systems, and applications (WASA). Lect Notes Comput Sci 10251:344–355. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author would like to acknowledge the generous support of Ministry of Higher Education, Government of Malaysia, for partly supporting the said research work via its prestigious Malaysian International Scholarship Grant, KPT. 600-4/1/12JLID 2(8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Mahmood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmood, A., Zen, H. (2018). Toward Edge-based Caching in Software-defined Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks. In: Mahmood, Z. (eds) Fog Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94890-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94890-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94889-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94890-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics