Skip to main content
  • 644 Accesses

Abstract

Prior to the early nineteenth century, most of the world’s population was employed in agriculture and was, by today’s standards, poor. The industrial revolution forever changed this trajectory, shifting workers from fields to factories and promoting a steady increase in the standard of living. To benefit from the industrial revolution, societies needed access to emerging technology and to investors with the freedom and financial resources to produce. They also needed the respect for private property and open markets. As a result, the USA, the UK, and other European nations were among the first to develop as largely capitalist societies and have remained global economic leaders. Japan, South Korea, China, and others have embraced free enterprise to varying degrees in the years since. Their economic ascensions have been varied and more recent, but no less remarkable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adly, A. I. (2009). Politically-embedded cronyism: The case of post-liberalization Egypt. Business and Politics, 11(4), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aplin, J. C., & Hegarty, W. H. (1980). Political influence: Strategies employed by organizations to impact legislation in business and economic matters. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, D., & Allen, D. (2010). What every CEO needs to know about nonmarket strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(3), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, P. R., & Viney, H. (2010). The unloved relationship? Dynamic capabilities and political-market strategy: A research agenda. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J.-P., Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J.-P., Holburn, G. L. F., & Vanden Bergh, R. G. (2006). Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. Electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1209–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buli, B. M. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and performance of smes in the manufacturing industry. Management Research Review, 40(3), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2016-0173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunkanwanicha, P., & Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2009). Big business owners in politics. Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2133–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., Sundqvist, S., Salminen, R. T., & Puumalainen, K. (2002). Market-oriented behavior: Comparing service with product exporters. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1076–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavazos, D. E., & Rutherford, M. A. (2012). Bringing regulatory agencies into organizational studies: Broadening the lens used to examine the state. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R., & March, J. G. (1963). Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N. M., Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Business & Society, 52(3), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313491470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. B., Kee, J., & Newcomer, K. (2010). Strategic transformation process: Toward purpose, people, process and power. Organization Management Journal, 7(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2010.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 575–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Kooijmans-van Lankveld, H. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (cpa). The Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Tian, Z., & Abrar, M. (2010). The corporate political strategy and its integration with market strategy in transitional China. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorobantu, S., Kaul, A., & Zelner, B. (2017a). Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorobantu, S., Luo, J., Hiatt, S. R., Jia, N., Lenox, M. J., Lyons, T. P., et al. (2017b, August 5). Research frontiers in nonmarket strategy (pdw). Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Reis, J. A. F., Meyer, V., Jr., & Meyer, B. (2012). Political strategies and organizational effectiveness: The case of contribution to political campaigns by brazilian corporations. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences, 1(5), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1980). Strategic management in multinational companies. Sloan Management Review, 21(2), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2016, May 07). Our crony-capitalism index; the party winds down. The Economist, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, R. J., & Hirschman, D. (2017). Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M. (2012). Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M., & Coombes, S. (2015). Complementary relationships between corporate philanthropy and corporate political activity: An exploratory study of political marketplace contingencies. Business and Society, 54(6), 859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M., Dahan, N. M., & Doh, J. P. (2015). The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). In search of el dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. J., & Mongiello, M. (2001). Key performance indicators in European hotel properties: General managers’ choices and company profiles. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(3), 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2012). Strategy and competition in the market and nonmarket arenas. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2553256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriyama, A., Kishore, R., & Talukdar, D. (2016). Playing dirty or building capability? Corruption and hr training as competitive actions to threats from informal and foreign firm rivals. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2152–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji-Yub, K., Jerayr, H., & Finkelstein, S. (2011). When firms are desperate to grow via acquisition: The effect of growth patterns and acquisition experience on acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 26–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, January/February). The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39(1), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). How strategy maps frame an organization’s objectives. Financial Executive, 20(2), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. B., & Norton, D. P. (2007). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 150–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keillor, B. D., Wilkinson, T. J., & Owens, D. (2005). Threats to international operations: Dealing with political risk at the firm level. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, A. F., Bergh, R. G. V., & Bonardi, J.-P. (2012). Political markets and regulatory uncertainty: Insights and implications for integrated strategy. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen, E. K. (2004). Nonfinancial factors as predictors of value creation: Finnish evidence. Review of Accounting & Finance, 3(3), 84–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, T., McGuire, S., & Rajwani, T. (2013). Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00337.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedong, T. A., Ghobadian, A., Rajwani, T., & O’Regan, N. (2015). Toward a view of complementarity: Trust and policy influence effects of corporate social responsibility and corporate political activity. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Maslach, D., Desai, V., & Madsen, P. (2015). The first 50 years and the next 50 years of a behavioral theory of the firm: An interview with James G. March. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.-C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2015). Strategy orientation, product innovativeness, and new product performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Leap, T. (2012). Corporate political activity: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 55(3), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Woehr, D. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macher, J. T., & Mayo, J. W. (2015). Influencing public policymaking: Firm-, industry-, and country-level determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanoglu, M., Okumus, F., & Avci, U. (2014). Building a case against strategic equifinality. Management Decision, 52(6), 1174–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, P. M., & Rodgers, Z. J. (2015). Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5), 776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical explanation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016a). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016b). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Roepstorff, A. (2015). CSR as corporate political activity: Observations on ikea’s CSR identify image dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2091-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Néron, P.-Y. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post- citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2867-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norreklit, H. (2000). The balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhmatovskiy, I. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. The Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J. A. (2015). Strategic political emphasis, strategic capabilities and uncertainty. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(1), 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., & Silverman, R. E. (2016, 18 April). Big business speaks up on social issues. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1–B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. A. (1999). Hotel performance and competitive advantage: A contingency approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(7), 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. A., & Moutinho, L. (1999). Measuring strategic planning effectiveness in hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(7), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2018, February 10–11). The enlightenment is working. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajwani, T., & Liedong, T. A. (2015). Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawant, R. J. (2012). Asset specificity and corporate political activity in regulated industries. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. (2017). Theory assessment and agenda setting in political CSR: A critical theory perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on csr and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business & Society, 53(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313511778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Scherer, A. G. (2016). Government beyond the shadow of hierarchy - the case of the CSR policies of the European union. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–1, doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.11887abstract.

  • Schulte, W. D. (2005). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(4), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.19086796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. E. (2013). Corporate political activity, social responsibility, and competitive strategy: An integrative model. Business Ethics, 22(3), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skapinker, M. (2010). Right or wrong, the customer always matters. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsal, O., Hassan, M. K., & Zirek, D. (2016). Corporate lobbying, CEO political ideology and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, M., & Crane, A. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 52(3), 52–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raaij, E. M., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2008). The implementation of a market orientation: A review and integration of the contributions to date. European Journal of Marketing, 42(11/12), 1265–1293. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090506810903673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Maguirre, M., & Hartmann, A. M. (2013). Nonmarket strategies of media enterprises in the mexican television industry. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1743–1749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, W., Zhao, X., Li, M., & Warner, M. (2016). Integrating nonmarket and market resources, strategy and performance in Chinese enterprises: A review of the field and a resource-based empirical study. Asia Pacific Business Review, 22(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1084140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, C. (2016). “Political” corporate social responsibility in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business & Society, 55(6), 792–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314537021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., & Frynas, J. G. (2006). The institutional basis of economic failure: Anatomy of the segmented business system. Socio - Economic Review, 4(2), 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, L. (2013). Shopping, seduction & Mr. Selfridge. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parnell, J.A. (2019). Introduction. In: Nonmarket Strategy in Business Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93242-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics