Skip to main content

Learning Algebra with Models and Reasoning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

In traditional mathematics classrooms, the use of representations is often restricted to the “show your work” instruction, perhaps involving a diagram or graph. As such, models and representations may have a more limited use. Mathematicians however, often use rough diagrams, gestures, etc. to think about and discuss mathematical ideas as they evolve. Hence in a problem-based classroom, encouraging students to make use of such models and representations as tools to think with can have a powerful effect. Such a use is very different from the assumption that models, such as in the form of physical classroom manipulatives, are tools to support struggling students. Rather, this chapter takes the stance that a vigorous use of models and reasoning can be highly mathematical, and effective for all students.

Many current Canadian curricula, as well as the Principles and standards for school mathematics (NCTM, Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author, Reston, 2000), have both Representation as well as Reasoning listed as learning processes. The use of models and modelling can support both of these processes.

As well as providing some background, this chapter provides a specific classroom example, which may be useful in grade 9 or 10 classrooms. The lesson has been field tested in both grade levels, as well as in relatively more and less high level courses. Without exception, students have been able to discover the rules for factoring a simple quadratics for themselves. As well as generating a useful factoring method, students are left with a conceptual understanding of how and why the method works, which may be helpful in terms of not having to memorize a mysterious procedure.

A secondary benefit of using models in learning may be that they may be a structure that help teachers move more and more towards encouraging increased student autonomy in learning. Once students have some effective tools with which to think, they may be able to become increasingly independent as learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2015). Lessons learned about effective professional development: Two contrasting case studies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(4), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajander, A., & Boland, T. (2014). Mathematical models for teaching: Reasoning without memorization. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajander, A., Zuke, C., & Walton, G. (2008). Teaching unheard voices: Students at risk in mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 1039–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum: Grades 9 and 10 mathematics (Rev. ed.). Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math910curr.pdf.

Additional Suggestions for Further Reading

  • Kajander, A. (2013–2016). MB4T: Math by and for teachers. Monthly column in the Ontario Mathematics Gazette.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Kajander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kajander, A. (2018). Learning Algebra with Models and Reasoning. In: Kajander, A., Holm, J., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92389-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92390-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics