Abstract
The K-12 educational system has a long tradition of integrating technological advances into the curriculum to enhance student learning. Most recently, the Flipped Classroom Model has been growing in popularity due to its potential for individualizing the learning process. This model deviates from a more traditional approach to teaching by moving content delivery to homework, which is often in the form of a video recorded lecture. This approach offers the opportunity for students to self-pace their learning, unlike learning from a more traditional class lecture. Furthermore, this model enables teachers to use collaborative activities that may not have otherwise be possible in traditional classrooms. Such innovative uses of technology in the classroom have altered the pedagogical choices of teachers and changed how students learn. The autonomy in the learning process and ability to self-pace content offered by many classroom technologies require students to be active participants in their own learning, otherwise termed self-regulated learning. This chapter offers a comprehensive lesson plan that demonstrates how technology (namely Flipped Classrooms and Social Media) can be effectively used to enhance an 11th grade World History class. In the first section, the lead teacher offers a detailed explanation of the lesson plan. In the second section, the scholar offers a commentary and analysis connecting the principles and constructs of self-regulated learning to the lesson.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The data examines the following areas: Power and Politics, Ideologies and Influences, Geography, Language and Communication, Economics, Turning Points, and Successes and Shortfalls.
References
Azevedo, R. (2014). Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self-and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 217–228.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., & Winters, F. I. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A Key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 53(1), 106–140.
Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with MetaCognitive tools. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Computers, cognition, and collaboration in education (pp. 225–247). Amsterdam: Springer.
Bender, B. (2005). Learner engagement and success in CMS environments. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 107–113). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Read every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19, 2012.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
Chanchary, F. H., Haque, I., & Khalid, M. S. (2008). Web usage mining to evaluate the transfer of learning in a web-based learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 249–253). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
DiBenedetto, M. K. (2018/this volume). Self-regulation in secondary classrooms: Theoretical and research applications to learning and performance. In M. K. DiBenedetto (Ed.), Connecting self-regulated learning and performance with instruction across high school content areas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International Publishing.
Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. C. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In Proceedings of the EDMEDIA 2003 Conference. Honolulu, HI.
Duffy, M., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338–348.
Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Azevedo, R., Legowski, E., Reitmeyer, K., Tseytlin, E., Crowley, R. S. (2014). Metacognitive scaffolds improve self-judgments of accuracy in a medical intelligent tutoring system. Instructional Science, 42(2), 159–181.
Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., Jackson, W. P., Caprino, A. M., Oswald, C., & Mcvea, M. (2015). Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111–128.
Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711–735.
Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4, 298–310.
Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, Lecture? Science, 323, 50–51.
McGee, P., Carmean, C., & Jafari, A. (2005). Preface. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. ix–xvii). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Moos, D. C. (2014). Setting the stage for metacognition during hypermedia learning: What motivation constructs matter? Computers & Education, 70, 128–137.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: To what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia? Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 197–216.
Moos, D. C., & Bonde, C. (2015). Flipping the classroom: Embedding self-regulated learning prompts in videos. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 225–242.
Moos, D. C., & Stewart, C. (2013). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: Bringing motivation into the conversation. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 683–697). New York, NY: Springer.
Newman, R. S. (2008). Adaptive and nonadaptive help seeking with peer harassment: An integrative perspective of coping and self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 1–15.
Poitras, E. G., & Lajoie, S. P. (2013). A domain-specific account of self-regulated learning: the cognitive and metacognitive activities involved in learning through historical inquiry. Metacognition and Learning, 8(3), 213–234.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learning. In S. L., Christensons, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–235). New York, NY: Springer.
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M., Ryan (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller, & I. B. Weiner, (Eds.). Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 7: Educational Psychology, pp. 45–68). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Shapiro, A. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 29–44.
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In D. Featherman, R. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 91–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & Nelson, D. (2005). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139.
Trevors, G., Duffy, M., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Note-taking within MetaTutor: Interactions between an intelligent tutoring system and prior knowledge on note-taking and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 507–528.
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiencies in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78.
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Winne, P. (2005). Key issues on modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 232–238.
Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705–722). New York: Cambridge.
Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moos, D.C., Stewart, C.A. (2018). Technology Uses in Instruction. In: DiBenedetto, M. (eds) Connecting Self-regulated Learning and Performance with Instruction Across High School Content Areas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90928-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90928-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90926-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90928-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)