Skip to main content

Introduction: ‘R2P Has Begun to Change the World’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect
  • 809 Accesses

Abstract

In his first report on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) since becoming UN Secretary-General, António Guterres noted, ‘There is a gap between our stated commitment to the responsibility to protect and the daily reality confronted by populations exposed to the risk of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity’ (2017, p. 1). Guterres thus succinctly identified the paradox that is the focus of this book; R2P is more popular amongst states than ever, yet state-sponsored oppression, and indeed atrocity crimes, are on the rise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, Amitav. 2013. The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards a Framework of Norm Circulation. Journal of the Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (1): 466–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Simon. 2015a. R2P at Ten. E-International Relations, March 29. http://www.e-ir.info/2015/03/29/r2p-at-10/.

  • Adams, Simon. 2015b. The Responsibility to Protect: Ten Years On. OpenCanada, May 8. https://www.opencanada.org/features/the-responsibility-to-protect-10-years-on/.

  • Adler, Emmanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. International Practices. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. 2015. Annual Report 2014/2015. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2015/02/annual-report-201415/.

  • Badescu, Cristina, and Thomas Weiss. 2010. Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral? International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael. 2010. The International Humanitarian Order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2009. Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2010. Kosovo and the Advent of Sovereignty as Responsibility. In Kosovo, Intervention and Statebuilding, ed. Aidan Hehir. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2012. Remarks to the General Assembly Informal Interactive Dialogue on the Responsibility to Protect. New York, September 5. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/Alex%20Bellamy.pdf.

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2015a. The Responsibility to Protect: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2015b. The Responsibility to Protect Turns Ten. Ethics & International Affairs 29 (2): 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Alexander, and Phil Orchard. 2014. Introduction: The Normative Institutionalization-Implementation Gap. In Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Politics, ed. Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, Mats. 2003. The UN Security Council: Ineffective but Indispensable. Survival 45 (2): 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Alan. 2016. Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change. Review of International Studies 42 (2): 310–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Alan, and Shirley Scott. 2016. Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Ken. 1994. Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs 71 (1): 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakey, Hugh. 2012. The Responsibility to Protect and the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: Overlap and Contrast. In Norms of Protection: Responsibility to Protect, Protection of Civilians and their Interaction, ed. Angus Francis, Vesselin Popovski, and Charles Sampford. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Garret, and Alexandra Bohm. 2015. Introducing Jus ante Bellum as a Cosmopolitan Approach to Humanitarian Intervention. European Journal of International Relations 22 (4): 897–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen Toope. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, Antonio. 2005. International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2): 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, Jeffrey. 1999. Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 83–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, Simon. 2002. Just War or Just Peace? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, Simon. 2003. Hard Cases Make Bad Law. In Just Intervention, ed. Anthony Lang. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, Simon. 2006. Humanitarian Intervention and Afghanistan. In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations, ed. Jennifer Welsh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, Simon. 2011. “Leading from Behind”: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya. Ethics & International Affairs 25 (3): 79–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinq-Mars, Evan. 2015. In Support of R2P: No Need to Reinvent the Wheel. OpenCanada, March 18. https://www.opencanada.org/features/in-support-of-r2p-no-need-to-reinvent-the-wheel/.

  • Cohen, Roberta. 2012. From Sovereign Responsibility to R2P. In The Routledge Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, ed. Andy Knight and Frazer Egerton. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Dylan. 2017. Syria War: “Worst Man-Made Disaster Since World War II”. Al Jazeera, March 15. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/03/syria-war-worst-man-disaster-world-war-ii-170315054907704.html.

  • Davies, Sara, and Alex Bellamy. 2014. Don’t Be Too Quick to Condemn the UN Security Council Power of Veto. The Conversation, August 12. https://theconversation.com/dont-be-too-quick-to-condemn-the-un-security-council-power-of-veto-29980.

  • Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Lisbeth Zimmermann. 2013. Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Working Paper 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Francis. 2010. JISB Interview: The Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4 (1): 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, George, and Michael Jones. 2002. Reputation, Compliance, and International Law. Journal of Legal Studies XXXI: 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Tim, and Katherine Gelber. 2014. Arguing Matters: The Responsibility to Protect and the Case of Libya. Global Responsibility to Protect 6 (3): 326–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Tim, and Jess Gifkins. 2011. Libya and the State of Intervention. Australian Journal of International Affairs 65 (5): 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth. 2008. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth 2009. From an Idea to an International Norm. In Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century, ed. Richard Cooper and Juliette Kohler. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth. 2015a. R2P: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Keynote Address, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, February 26. http://www.gevans.org/speeches/speech568.html.

  • Evans, Gareth 2015b. ‘Good International Citizenship’, Keynote Address, Sydney University, Australia, 27 August 2015. http://gevans.org/speeches/speech580.html.

  • Evans, Gareth. 2016a. Foreword. International Relations 30 (3): 259–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth. 2016b. R2P: The Next Ten Years. In Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, ed. Alex Bellamy and Tim Dunne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, K.M. 2002. Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. In The Culture of National Security, ed. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organizations 52 (4): 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Thomas. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Adrian. 2015. The Promise of Pillar II: Analysing International Assistance Under the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs 91 (6): 1259–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2013. The BRICS and the Responsibility to Protect: Lessons from the Libyan and Syrian Crises. In Responsibility to Protect in Theory and Practice, ed. Vasilka Sancin and Maša Kovič Dine. Ljubjana: GV Založba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Erenst. 1994. The Conditions of Liberty. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholiagha, Sassan. 2015. “To Prevent Future Kosovos and Future Rwandas”. A Critical Constructivist View of the Responsibility to Protect. The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (8): 1074–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifkins, Jess. 2016. R2P in the UN Security Council: Darfur, Libya and Beyond. Cooperation and Conflict 51 (2): 148–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Jonathan. 2015. The Cosmopolitan Military: Armed Forces and Human Security in the 21st Century. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, Luke. 2011. The Antecedents of “Sovereignty as Responsibility”. European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, Luke. 2016. Does R2P Matter? Interpreting the Impact of a Norm. Cooperation and Conflict 51 (2): 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Charles. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. 2015. Restrain the Veto. www.restraintheveto.com.

  • Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. 2018. UN Security Council Resolutions Referencing R2P. http://www.globalr2p.org/resources/335.

  • Global Public Policy Institute. 2015. Effective and Responsible Protection from Atrocity Crimes: Towards Global Action. Policy Paper, April. http://www.globalnorms.net/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/GlobalNorms_2015_Effective_and_Responsible_R2P.pdf.

  • Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A., Posner. 2002a. Introduction. Journal of Legal Studies, XXXI: S1–S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. 2002b. Moral and Legal Rhetoric in International Relations: A Rational Choice Perspective. Journal of Legal Studies XXXI: S115–S139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guterres, António. 2017. Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Accountability for Prevention. Report of the Secretary General, A/71/1016, August 10. http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/2017%20SG%20report%20on%20RtoP%20Advanced%20copy.pdf.

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, Aidan. 2013. The Permanence of Inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security 38 (1): 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, Aidan. 2015. Bahrain: An R2P Blindspot? International Journal of Human Rights 19 (8): 1129–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, Aidan. 2016. Assessing the Influence of the Responsibility to Protect on the UN Security Council during the Arab Spring. Cooperation and Conflict 51 (2): 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, Aidan. 2017. Introduction: Denial, Fatalism, and the Protection of Human Rights. In Protecting Human Rights in the 21st Century, ed. Aidan Hehir, and Robert Murray. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Louis. 1990. Compliance with International Law in an Inter-State System. In Academie de droit international, Recueil des cours 1989. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Gregor. 2015. Ten Years R2P—What Doesn’t Kill a Norm Only Makes It Stronger? Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Report 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopgood, Stephen. 2014. The Last Rites for Humanitarian Intervention: Darfur, Sri Lanka and R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect 6 (2): 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Michael. 1984. The Causes of War and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2000. Introduction. World Report 2000. www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k/.

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In The Culture of National Security, ed. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, Inge. 1995. Peace Needs no Weapons. Ecumenical Review 47 (3): 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans. 1972. Peace Through Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ki-Moon, Ban. 2009. Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. UN Secretary General Report, A/63/677, January 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ki-Moon, Ban. 2015. A Vital and Enduring Commitment: Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. UN Secretary General Report, A/69/981, July 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and US Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization 49 (3): 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowert, Paul, and Jeffrey Legro. 1996. Norms, Identity and Their Limits. In The Culture of National Security, ed. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, Mona Lena, and Jacqui True. 2010. Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labonte, Melissa. 2013. Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms, Strategic Framing, and Intervention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, Jeffrey. 1997. Which Norms Matter? International Organisation 51 (1): 31–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertus, Julie. 2009. The United Nations and Human Rights. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Justin. 2013. Libya and Syria: R2P and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum. International Affairs 89 (5): 1265–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Robert W., and Aidan Hehir. 2012. Intervention in the Emerging Multipolar System: Why R2P will Miss the Unipolar Moment. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (4): 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negron-Gonzales, Melinda, and Michael Contarino. 2014. Local Norms Matter: Understanding National Responses to the Responsibility to Protect. Global Governance 20 (2): 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nougayrède, Natalie. 2012. Interview with Kofi Annan: “On Syria, It’s Obvious, We Haven’t Succeeded”. Le Monde, July 7. http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2012/07/07/kofi-annan-sur-la-syrie-a-l-evidence-nous-n-avons-pas-reussi_1730658_3218.html.

  • Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide. 2014. Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes: A Tool for Prevention. http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/framework%20of%20analysis%20for%20atrocity%20crimes_en.pdf.

  • Panke, Diana, and Ulrich Petersohn. 2011. Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 719–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, Roland. 2014. The “Responsibility to Protect” and the Structural Problems of Preventative Humanitarian Intervention. International Peacekeeping 21 (5): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, James. 2010. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Rodger. 2001. Persuasion, Frames, and Norm Construction. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Anne. 2009. Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty. The European Journal of International Law 20 (3): 513–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, Samantha. 2009. Foreword. In Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century, ed. Richard Cooper and Juliette Kohler. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quackenbush, Stephen. 2004. The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory. International Interactions 30 (2): 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton-Brown, Patrick. 2013. Mapping Dissent: The Responsibility to Protect and its State Critics. Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (3): 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Horta, Jose. 2015. Preventing Conflicts, Mediating the End of Wars, Building Durable Peace. Fifth Annual Gareth Evans Lecture, October 8. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/gelramos-horta.pdf.

  • Reus-Smit, Christian. 2005. Liberal Hierarchy and the License to Use Force. In Force and Legitimacy in World Politics, ed. David Armstrong, Theo Farrell, and Bice Maiguashca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Geoffrey. 2002. Crimes Against Humanity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne. 2008. Dynamics of International Norm Change. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne, and Kendall Stiles. 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Martin. 1994. Global Civil Society and International Relations. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, Carsten. 2007. Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm? American Journal of International Law 101 (1): 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudan. 2015. Statement of the Republic of the Sudan—Informal Interactive Dialogue on R2P. September 8. http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/sudan.pdf.

  • The Stanley Foundation. 2015. The Responsibility to Protect at Ten: Perspectives and Opportunities. November. http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/resources.cfm?id=1581.

  • Thomas, Nicholas, and William Tow. 2002. The Utility of Human Security: Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention. Security Dialogue 33 (2): 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Alexander. 2002. Applying Rational Choice Theory to International Law: The Promise and Pitfalls. The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1): S285–S306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2015. World at War: UNHCR Global Trends. http://unhcr.org/556725e69.html.

  • United Nations Human Rights. 2017. Myanmar: UN Human Rights Chief Calls for International Criminal Investigation of Perpetrators of Violence Against Rohingya. December 5. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22488&LangID=E.

  • Van Kersbergen, Kees, and Bertjan Verbeek. 2007. The Politics of International Norms. European Journal of International Relations 13 (2): 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterom, Karl. 2015. Statement on Behalf of The Group of Friends on the Responsibility to Protect at the UN General Assembly Informal Interactive on the Responsibility to Protect. September 8. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/Group%20of%20friends.pdf.

  • Weiss, Thomas. 2014. Military Humanitarianism: Syria Hasn’t Killed It. The Washington Quarterly 37 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer. 2013. Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (4): 365–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer. 2015. The Responsibility to Prevent: Assessing the Gap between Rhetoric and Reality. Cooperation and Conflict 51 (2): 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer. 2006. Conclusion: The Evolution of Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations, ed. Jennifer Welsh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer. 2014. Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Catalyzing Debate and Building Capacity. In Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Politics, ed. Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. A Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Nicholas, and Justin Morris. 2007. Justifying the Iraq War as a Humanitarian Intervention: The Cure is Worse Than the Disease. In The Iraq Crisis and World Order: Structural, Institutional and Normative Challenges, ed. Ramesh Thakur and W.P.S. Sidhu. New York: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje. 2004. Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje. 2009. Enacting Meaning-in-use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations. Review of International Studies 35 (1): 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, Philip. 2007. The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aidan Hehir .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hehir, A. (2019). Introduction: ‘R2P Has Begun to Change the World’. In: Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90536-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics