Abstract
Please check whether the output of Advance Reading is appropriate as rendered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brick, J. M. (2013). Unit nonresponse and weighting adjustments: A critical review. Journal of Official Statistics, 29(3), 329–353.
Brick, J. M., & Jones, M. E. (2008). Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias. METRON – International Journal of Statistics, LXVI(1), 51–73.
Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sample frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 427–444.
Deville, J.-C., & Särndal, C.-E. (1992). Calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(418), 376–382.
Deville, J.-C., Särndal, C.-E., & Sautory, O. (1993). Generalized raking procedures in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 1013–1020.
Ekholm, A., & Laaksonen, S. (1991). Weighting via response modelling in the Finnish Household Budget Survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 7(2), 325–337.
Estevao, V. M., & Särndal, C.-E. (2006). Survey estimates by calibration on complex auxiliary information. International Statistical Review, 74(2), 127–147.
European Social Survey. (2014). Documentation of ESS post-stratification weights. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/ESS_post_stratification_weights_documentation.pdf
Haziza, D., & Lesage, E. (2016). Discussion of weighting procedures for unit nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 32(1), 129–145.
Holt, D., & Smith, T. M. F. (1979). Post-stratification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 142, 33–46.
Kott, P., & Chang, T. (2010). Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonignorable unit nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(491), 1265–1275.
Laaksonen, S. (2007). Weighting for two-phase surveyed data. Survey Methodology, 33(2), 121–130.
Laaksonen, S., & Hämäläinen, A. (2018). Joint response propensity and calibration weighting. Journal of Statistis in Transition New Series, 19(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2018-003.
Laaksonen, S., & Heiskanen, M. (2014). Comparison of three modes for a victimization survey. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 2(4), 459–483.
Laaksonen, S., Kemppainen, T., Kortteinen, M., Vaattovaara, M., Stjernberg, M. & Lönnqvist, H. (2015). Tackling city-regional dynamics in a survey using grid sampling. Survey Research Association. http://www.surveymethods.org
Le Guennec, J. & Sautory, O. (2005). CALMAR 2: Une Nouvelle Version de la Macro Calmar de Redressement D’Échantillon Par Calage. Retrieved February 2016, from http://vserverinsee.nexen.net/jms2005/site/files/documents/2005/327_1-JMS2002_SESSION1_LE-GUENNEC-SAUTORY_CALMAR-2_ACTES.PDF[Read 2014}
Little, R. J. A. (1986). Survey nonresponse adjustments for estimates of means. International Statistical Review, 54, 139–157.
Lundström, S., & Särndal, C.-E. (1999). Calibration as a standard method for treatment of nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 305–327.
McCormack, K. (2006). The calibration software CALMAR – What is it?. Central Statistics Office Ireland. Retrieved March 2014, from http://vesselinov.com/CalmarEngDoc.pdf
Särndal, C.-E. (2007). Calibration approach in survey theory and practice. Survey Methodology, 33(2), 99–119.
Särndal, C.-E., & Lundquist, P. (2014). Accuracy in estimation with nonresponse: A function of degree of imbalance and degree of explanation. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 2(4), 361–387.
Sautory, O. (2003). CALMAR 2: A new version of the calmar calibration adjustment program. Proceedings of Statistics Canada’s Symposium: Challenges in Survey Taking for the Next Decade.
Smith, T. M. F. (1991). Post-stratification. The Statistician, 40, 315–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laaksonen, S. (2018). Weighting Adjustments Because of Unit Non-response. In: Survey Methodology and Missing Data. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79011-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79011-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79010-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79011-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)