Skip to main content

Beyond Adversarialism?: Collaboration and Therapeutic Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Therapeutic Justice
  • 530 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the theory of therapeutic jurisprudence and highlights the centrality of this orientation for MHCs. I outline the major paradigm shifts characteristic of MHCs—treatment orientation and collaboration and describe my formulation of “therapeutic justice.” I detail the mission of MHCs and the changes in court structure and culture, noting how a treatment orientation works in practice of a less adversarial model of criminal justice. In the chapter, I show that net-widening does occur in the case of MHCs—expanding the number of individuals under the control of the criminal justice system and the intensity and severity of criminal justice intervention—resulting in offenders becoming entangled in wider, stronger and denser nets. The chapters ends by revisiting the court’s mission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson, Marc F. 1972. “The Criminalization of Mentally Disordered Behavior Possible Side-Effect of a New Mental Health Law.” Hospital and Community Psychiatry 23: 101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, Lauren, and Elizabeth Dodd. 2009. Mental Health Courts: A Guide to Reserach-Informed Policy and Practice. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeyer, M. C., and H. Matschinger. 2003. “The Stigma of Mental Illness: Effects of Labelling on Public Attitudes towards People with Mental Disorder.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 108 (4): 304–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00150.x.

  • Austin, James, and Barry Krisberg. 1981. “Wider, Stronger, and Different Nets: The Dialectics of Criminal Justice Reform.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 18 (1): 165–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Katherine, and Steve Herbert. 2009. Banished: The New Social Control in Urban America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1969. “An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.” In A Bentham Reader, edited by Mary Peter Mack, 86–87. New York: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt. 2005. Good Courts: The Case for Problem-Solving Justice. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Robert, and Tammy Seltzer. 2003. “Criminalization of People with Mental Illnesses: The Role of Mental Health Courts in System Reform.” The University of the District of Columbia Law Review 7: 143–62. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.

  • Boldt, Richard C. 2009. “A Circumspect Look at Problem-Solving Courts.” In Problem-Solving Courts: Justice for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Paul Higgins and Mitchell B. Mackinem, 13–32. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Timothy. 2004. “When Good Intentions Are Not Enough: Problem-Solving Courts and the Impending Crisis of Legitimacy.” SMU Law Review 57: 1459–520. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.

  • Castellano, Ursula. 2011. Outsourcing Justice: The Role of Nonprofit Caseworkers in Pretrial Release Programs. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, Ursula, and Leon Anderson. 2013. “Mental Health Courts in America: Promise and Challenges.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2): 163–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212465616.

  • Daicoff, Susan. 2000. “The Role of Therapeutic Jurisprudence within the Comprehensive Law Movement.” In Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Law as a Helping Profession, 465–92. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Patricia, and Steven Erickson. 2008. Crime, Punishment, and Mental Illness: Law and the Behavioral Sciences in Conflict. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, Particia, and Susan S. Silbey. 1998. The Commone Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, Michael J., Russell Kurth, Christopher Cadle, and Jessica Mullan. 2009. “Competency Courts: A Creative Solution for Restoring Competency to the Competency Process.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 27: 767–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.

  • Fisher, William H., Eric Silver, and Nancy Wolff. 2006. “Beyond Criminalization: Toward a Criminologically Informed Framework for Mental Health Policy and Services Research.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 33 (5): 544–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0072-0.

  • Fisler, Carol. 2015. “When Research Chllenges Policy and Practice: Toward a New Understanding of Mental Health Courts.” The Judges’ Journal 54 (2): 8–13. http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/JJ_SP15_54_2_Fisler.pdf.

  • Fritzler, Randal B. 2003. “10 Key Components of a Criminal Metnal Health Court.” In Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Coirts, 118–23. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legl Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., and C. Irons-Guynn. 2000. Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage, 1–83. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/182504.pdf.

  • Harcourt, Bernard E. 2006. “From the Asylum to the Prison: Rethinking the Incarceration Revolution.” Texas Law Review 84: 1751–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alexis. 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, Kirk, David DeMatteo, Heidi Strohmaier, and Meghann Galloway. 2015. “The Movement Toward Community-Based Alternatives to Criminal Justice Involvement and Incarceration for People with Severe Mental Illness.” In The Sequential Intercept Model and Criminal Justice: Promoting Community Alternatives for Individuals with Serious Mental Illness, edited by Patricia A. Griffin, Krik Heilbrun, Edward P. Mulvey, David DeMatteo, and Carol A. Schubert, 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hora, Peggy Fulton, William G. Schma, and John T. A. Rosenthal. 1999. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System’s Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America.” Notre Dame Law Review 74: 439–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Shannon, and Terry Peak. 2013. “A Critical Perspective on the Role of Psychotropic Medications in Mental Health Courts.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2): 244–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458273.

  • Johnston, E. Lea. 2012. “Theorizing Mental Health Courts.” Washington University Law Review 89 (3): 519–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, Dale E., Naomi Sadeh, Kevin L. Delucchi, and Renée L. Binder. 2015. “Prospective Study of Violence Risk Reduction by a Mental Health Court.” Psychiatric Services 66 (6): 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400203.

  • Metzl, Jonathan M., and Kenneth T. MacLeish. 2015. “Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms.” American Journal of Public Health 105 (2): 240–49. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302242.

  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations : Formal Structure as Myth.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.

  • Miller, JoAnn, and Donald C. Johnson. 2009. Problem Solving Courts: A Measure of Justice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Stephen J. 1999. “Craziness and Criminal Responsibility.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 17 (2): 147–64. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199904/06)17:2%3C147::AIDBSL336%3E3.0.CO;2-X.

  • Nolan, James L. Jr. 1998. The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century’s End. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. “Redefining Criminal Courts: Problem-Solving and the Meaning of Justice.” American Criminal Law Review 40: 1541–65. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.

  • Paik, Leslie. 2011. Discretionary Justice: Looking inside a Juvenile Drug Court. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, Michael. 2013. “‘The Judge, He Cast His Robe Aside’: Mental Health Courts, Dignity and Due Process.” Mental Health Law & Policy Journal 3 (1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J., J. L. Skeem, E. Hart, S. Vidal, and F. Keith. 2010. “Analyzing Offense Patterns as a Function of Mental Illness to Test the Criminalization Hypothesis.” Psychiatric Services 61 (12): 1217–22. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.61.12.1217.

  • Ray, Bradley, Brittany J. Hood, and Kelli E. Canada. 2015. “What Happens to Mental Health Court Noncompleters?” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33 (6): 801–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2163.

  • Ray, Bradley, Sheryl Pimlott Kubiak, Erin B. Comartin, and Elizabeth Tillander. 2015. “Mental Health Court Outcomes by Offense Type at Admission.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42 (3): 323–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0572-2.

  • Rottman, David, and Pamela Casey. 1999. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Emergence of Problem-Solving Courts.” National Institute of Justice Journal 240 (July): 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. 1974. “The Labelling Theory of Mental Illness.” American Sociological Review 39 (3): 444–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Richard D., Hy Bloom, and Mark Heerema. 2007. Mental Helath Courts: Decriminalizing the Mentall Ill. Toronto: Irwin Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, Tammy. 2005. “Mental Health Courts a Misguided Attempt to Address the Criminal Justice System’s Unfair Treatment of People with Mental Illnesses.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 11 (4): 570–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.4.570.

  • Silver, Eric. 2006. “Understanding the Relationship between Mental Disorder and Violence: The Need for a Criminological Perspective.” Law and Human Behavior 30 (6): 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9018-z.

  • Skeem, Jennifer L., Paula Emke-Francis, and Jennifer Eno Louden. 2006. “Probation, Mental Health, and Mandated Treatment: A National Survey.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 33 (2): 158–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854805284420.

  • Skeem, Jennifer L., Sarah Manchak, and Jillian K. Peterson. 2011. “Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness: Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction.” Law and Human Behavior 35 (2): 110–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9223-7.

  • Slobogin, Christopher. 1996. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Five Dilemmas to Ponder.” In Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 763–93. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, Henry J., Lisa Callahan, Pamela Clark Robbins, Roumen Vesselinov, Thomas G. McGuire, and Joseph P. Morrissey. 2014. “Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Care Costs of Mental Health Court Participants: A Six-Year Study.” Psychiatric Services 65 (9): 1100–104. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300375.

  • Watson, Amy, Patricia Hanrahan, Daniel Luchins, and Arthur Lurigio. 2001. “Mental Health Courts and the Complex Issue of Mentally Ill Offenders.” Psychiatric Services 52 (4): 477–81. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.477.

  • Wexler, David B. 1973. “Therapeutic Justice.” Minnesota Law Review 57: 289–338. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.

  • ———. 2000. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Culture of Critique.” In Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Law as a Helping Profession, 449–64. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, David B., and Bruce J. Winick. 1991. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence as a New Appraoch to Mental Helath Law Policy Analysis and Research.” University of Miami Law Review 45 (5): 979–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B J. 1994. “The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 17 (1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(94)90039-6.

  • ———. 1996. “The Side Effects of Incompetency Labeling and the Implications for Mental Health Law.” In Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 17–58. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Nancy. 2002. “Courts as Therapeutic Agents: Thinking Past the Novelty of Mental Health Courts.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 30 (3): 431–37. http://jaapl.org/content/30/3/431.full.pdf.

  • Yngvesson, Barbara. 1994. “Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town.” In Law and Community in Three American Towns, edited by Carol J. Greenhouse, Barbara Yngvesson, and David M. Engel, 54–90. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen A. Snedker .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Snedker, K.A. (2018). Beyond Adversarialism?: Collaboration and Therapeutic Goals. In: Therapeutic Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78902-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78902-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78901-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78902-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics