Skip to main content

Transitioning with Disability: Justice for Women with Disabilities in Post-War Sri Lanka

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Transitional Gender Justice

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

Abstract

This chapter maps the conditions within which the human rights of people with disabilities are addressed in the transitional justice context in Sri Lanka, with particular emphasis on rural and (more directly) war-affected women with disabilities. We argue that at a time when disability is internationally gaining recognition as needing to be addressed for transitional justice to be effectively realised, Sri Lanka is only now beginning to identify disability as relevant to the nation’s post-war stability (Ortoleva, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 33: 83–142, 2010). That said, the state’s focus in terms of disability is on the demilitarisation of ex-military personnel, for whom disability is constructed in terms of masculinity and reintegration into society as productive citizens (de Mel, Playing Disability, Performing Gender: Militarised Masculinity and Disability Theatre in the Sri Lankan War and Its Aftermath. In Disability in the Global South, ed. Shaun Grech and Karen Soldatic, Springer, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 99–116, 2016). Using a human rights framework, as recognised in the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), this chapter explores the lived experiences of women with disabilities in two intersecting contexts: ‘the rural’ and ‘post-war.’ Drawing upon interviews with women with disabilities from the North Central Province and the Eastern Province in Sri Lanka, this chapter demonstrates the ways in which women with disabilities are subject to multiple forms of discrimination, are systematically disempowered and ignored by the Sri Lankan legal system, have no access to effective administrative or judicial remedies, and enjoy only minimal assistance from the state through various welfare programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) 1979, ratified by Sri Lanka in October 1981; the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) 2006 was ratified by Sri Lanka in February 2016.

  2. 2.

    Official Language Act No 33 of 1956 (Sinhala Only Act).

  3. 3.

    HRC, ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’ A/HRC/RES/19/2 (2012); HRC, ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’ A/HRC/RES/22/1 (2013); HRC, ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’ A/HRC/RES/25/1 (2014) <http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/RES/25/1> accessed 26 Feb. 2017; HRC, ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’ A/HRC/30/L.29 (2015) <https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G15/220/93/PDF/G1522093.pdf?OpenElement> accessed26 Feb. 2017.

  4. 4.

    In Sri Lanka, the official definition of ‘rural’ is that given by the Department of Census and Statistics. Accordingly, all areas that are not declared as urban sectors or as the estate sector are considered to be ‘rural’ (Department of Census and Statistics, Sri Lanka 2011).

  5. 5.

    See further Item 17 of the Sri Lanka National Plan of Action for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights 2011–2016 (Government of Sri Lanka 2011).

  6. 6.

    Ajith Perera v Attorney General SC (FR) 221/2009, SC Minutes of 27 April 2009 & Ajith Perera v AG SC(FR) 221/2009, SC Minutes 27 April 2011.

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Protection of Persons with Disabilities Act No 28 of 1996 (the Act).

  9. 9.

    Article 126 of the Constitution.

  10. 10.

    S 24(3) of the Act.

  11. 11.

    See, for instance, Ramupillai v Festus Perera [1991] 1 Sri LR 11; Kavirathne v Commissioner General of Examinations SC (FR) No 29/2012, SC Minutes of 25 June 2012.

  12. 12.

    See for an analysis of this determination, Samararatne (2013).

  13. 13.

    Elections (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Bill, S.D. No. 09/2009, delivered on 6 November 2009.

  14. 14.

    Ibid.

  15. 15.

    See for instance, Lanka Multi Moulds (pvt) Ltd v Wimalasena, Commissioner of Labour and Others [2003] 4 Sri LR 143.

  16. 16.

    See also Article 32, CRPD.

References

  • Berghs, Maria, and Nawaf Kabbara. 2016. Disabled People in Conflicts and Wars. In Disability in the Global South, ed. Shaun Grech and Karen Soldatic, 269–284. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2013. A Review of Disability Law and Legal Mobilisation in Sri Lanka. LST Review 23 (308): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 1991. General Recommendation No. 18: Disabled Women. Tenth session. UN Doc A/46/38.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. General Recommendation No. 34 on the Rights of Rural Women. Sixty-third session. CEDAW/C/GC/34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Concluding Observations on the Eighth Periodic Report of Sri Lanka. CEDAW/C/LKA/CO/8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consultation Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms. 2016. Final Report of the Consultation Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms. Sri Lanka: Secretariat for Coordinating Reconciliation Mechanisms.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Silva de Alwis, Rangita. 2009. Mining the Intersections: Advancing the Rights of Women and Children with Disabilities within an interrelated web of Human Rights. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 18 (1): 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mel, Neloufer. 2016. Playing Disability, Performing Gender: Militarised Masculinity and Disability Theatre in the Sri Lankan War and Its Aftermath. In Disability in the Global South, ed. Shaun Grech and Karen Soldatic, 99–116. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Census & Statistics. 2012. Census of Population and Housing, 2012. Colombo: Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowse, Leanne, Karen Soldatic, Aminath Didi, and Georgia Van Toorn. 2013. Stop the Violence: Addressing Violence Against Women and Girls with Disabilities in Australia – Background Paper. Hobart: Women With Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandopulle, Sudarshini, Neil Thalagala, and Simon Barraclough. 2002. Mental Health in Sri Lanka: Challenges for Primary Health Care. Australian Journal of Primary Health 8 (2): 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Sri Lanka. 2011. Sri Lanka National Plan of Action for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights 2011–2016. n.p.: Government of Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groce, Nora E. 1997. Women with Disabilities in the Developing World: Arenas for Policy Revision and Programmatic Change. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 8 (1-2): 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasekara, Rasika S., and Tim Schultz. 2007. Health Status, Trends, and Issues in Sri Lanka. Nursing and Health Sciences 9: 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandasamy, Niroshini, Karen Soldatic, and Dinesha Samararatne. 2017. Southern Gendered Disability Reflections: The Everyday Experiences of Rural Women with a Disability after the Armed Conflict in Sri Lanka. In Rurality and Disability: Gender, Identity and Belonging, ed. Karen Soldatic and Kelley Johnson, 110–127. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission. 2011. Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation. Sri Lanka: Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Angela W., and Siri T. Hettige. 2013. Globalisation, Employment and Education in Sri Lanka: Opportunity and Division. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mégret, Frédéric. 2008. The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights? Human Rights Quarterly 30: 494–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR). 2017. National Policy on Reconciliation and Coexistence. Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortoleva, Stephanie. 2010. Women with Disabilities: The Forgotten Peace Builders. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 33: 83–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Inaccessible Justice: Human Rights, Persons with Disabilities and the Legal System. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 17 (2): 281–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiris-John, R.J., S. Attanayake, L. Daskon, A.R. Wickremasinghe, and S. Ameratunga. 2013. Disability Studies in Sri Lanka: Priorities for Action. Disability and Rehabilitation 36 (20): 1742–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, Ajith C.S. 2015. To a Secured Future Under ‘Maithri Rule’ for our Biggest Minority Group. Colombo Telegraph, July 5. https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/to-a-secured-future-under-maithri-rule-for-our-biggest-minority-group/.

  • Public Representations Committee on Constitutional Reform. 2016. Report on Public Representations on Constitutional Reform. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Public Representations Committee on Constitutional Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samararatne, Dinesha. 2013. A Provisional Evaluation of the Contribution of the Appellate Judiciary to Political Reconciliation in Sri Lanka. Colombo: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samararatne, Dinesha, and Karen Soldatic. 2014. Rural Disabled Women’s Social Inclusion in Post-armed Conflict Sri Lanka. Sydney: UNSW Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Inclusions and Exclusions in Law: Experiences of Women with Disability in Rural and War-affected Areas in Sri Lanka. Disability & Society 30 (5): 759–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sri Lanka Police. 2014. Children and Women Bureau. http://www.police.lk/index.php/child-a-women-bureau. Accessed 24 Jun 2016.

  • Steering Committee of the Constitutional Assembly. 2016. Report of the Sub-Committee on Fundamental Rights. Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte: Steering Committee of the Constitutional Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2011. Report of the Secretary General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Report of the Secretary-General’s Internal Review Panel on United Nations Action in Sri Lanka. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Council. 2015. Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL). New York: United Nations Human Rights Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2015. Sri Lanka: Data. http://data.worldbank.org/country/sri-lanka. Accessed 20 Oct 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Soldatic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samararatne, D., Soldatic, K. (2019). Transitioning with Disability: Justice for Women with Disabilities in Post-War Sri Lanka. In: Shackel, R., Fiske, L. (eds) Rethinking Transitional Gender Justice. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77890-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics