Skip to main content

Recent Work on Mock Theta Functions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ramanujan's Lost Notebook

Abstract

The work of Ramanujan has had a wide ranging impact in many branches of mathematics. Among many fields of research influenced by Ramanujan, few are as currently vibratingly active as the area of mock theta functions. In this chapter, we provide a brief and incomplete account of this activity. We have already discussed at the end of Chapter 12 many of the extensive contributions of B. Gordon and R. McIntosh [145147] jointly and McIntosh [201205] individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A.K. Agarwal, n-color partition theoretic interpretations of some mock theta functions, Electron. J. Combin. 11 (2004), Note 14, 6 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.K. Agarwal, New combinatorial interpretations of some mock theta functions, Online J. Anal. Comb., No. 2 (2007), Art 5, 7 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.K. Agarwal and G. Narang, Generalized Frobenius partitions and mock-theta functions, Ars Combin. 99 (2011), 439–444.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Agarwal and M. Rana, Two new combinatorial interpretations of a fifth order mock theta function, J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 74 (2007), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.K. Agarwal and G. Sood, Split (n + t)-color partitions and Gordon–McIntosh eight order mock theta functions, Electron. J. Combin. 21 (2014), paper 2.46, 10 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.K. Agarwal and G. Sood, A survey of mock theta functions from the combinatorial point of view, in Recent Advances in Mathematics, 118, Ramanujan Math. Soc. Lect. Notes, Ser. 21, Ramanujan Math. Soc., Mysore, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ahlgren and B. Kim, Mock theta functions and weakly holomorphic modular forms modulo 2 and 3, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 158 (2015), 111–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Andersen, Classification of congruences for mock theta functions and weakly holomorphic modular forms, Quart. J. Math. 65 (2014), 781–805.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. G.E. Andrews, On the theorems of Watson and Dragonette for Ramanujan’s mock theta functions, Amer. J. Math. 88 (1966), 454–490; [29, pp. 17–53].

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.E. Andrews, On basic hypergeometric series, mock theta functions, and partitions (II), Quart. J. Math. (Oxford) 17 (1966), 132–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G.E. Andrews, On a transformation of bilateral series with applications, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1970), 554–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G.E. Andrews, Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook. I. partial θ-functions, Adv. Math. 41 (1981), 137–172.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. G.E. Andrews, Partitions, Durfee symbols and the Atkin–Garvan moments of ranks, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), 37–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. G.E. Andrews and B.C. Berndt, Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Part I, Springer, New York, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G.E. Andrews and B.C. Berndt, Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Part II, Springer, New York, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.E. Andrews and B.C. Berndt, Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Part III, Springer, New York, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.E. Andrews, A. Dixit, and A.J. Yee, Partitions associated with the Ramanujan/Watson mock theta functions, Res. in Number Thy. 1 (2015), 19 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.E. Andrews and S. Hill, Partition identities with mixed modular forms, J. Number Thy. 158 (2016), 356–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. G.E. Andrews, D. Passary, J.A. Sellers, and A.J. Yee, Congruences related to the Ramanujan/Watson mock theta function ω(q), Ramanujan J. 43 (2017), 347–357.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. G.E. Andrews and A.J. Yee, Some identities associated with the mock theta functions ω(q) and ν(q), Ramanujan J., to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.H.M. Brietzke, J.P.O. Santos, and R. da Silva, A new approach and generalizations to some results about mock theta functions, Discrete Math. 311 (2011), 595–615.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. E.H.M. Brietzke, J.P.O. Santos, and R. da Silva, Combinatorial interpretations as two-line array for the mock theta functions, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 44 (2013), 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Bringmann, Mock theta functions, weak Maass forms, and applications, in Modular Forms on Schiermonnikoog, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2008, 29–56.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Bringmann, On the explicit construction of higher deformations of partition statistics, Duke Math. J. 144 (2008), 195–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Bringmann, A. Folsom, and K. Ono, q−series and weight 3∕2 Maass forms, Compositio Math. 145 (2009), 541–552.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Bringmann, A.E. Holroyd, K. Mahlburg, and M. Vlasenko, k-run overpartitions and mock theta functions, Quart. J. Math. 64 (2013), 1009–1021.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Bringmann and J. Lovejoy, Dyson’s rank, overpartitions, and weak Maass forms, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2007), rnm063.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Bringmann, J. Lovejoy, and K. Mahlburg, A partition identity and the universal mock theta function g 2, Math. Res. Lett. 23 (2016), 67–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, The f(q) mock theta function conjecture and partition ranks, Invent. Math. 165 (2006), 243–266.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Lifting cusp forms to Maass forms with an application to partitions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104 (2007), 3725–3731.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Arithmetic properties of coefficients of half-integral weight Maass–Poincaré series, Math. Ann. 337 (2007), 591–612.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Dyson’s ranks and Maass forms, Ann. Math. 171 (2010), 419–449.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Coefficients of harmonic Maass forms, in Partitions, q-Series, and Modular Forms, K. Alladi and F. Garvan, eds., Develop. in Math. 23, 2011, Springer, New York, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. Bringmann, K. Ono, and R.C. Rhoades, Eulerian series as modular forms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 1085–1104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. K. Bringmann and L. Rolen, Radial limits of mock theta functions, Research Math. Sci. 2 (2015), 2–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. J.H. Bruinier and M. Schwagenscheidt, Algebraic formulas for the coefficients of mock theta functions and Weyl vectors of Borcherds products, J. Algebra 478 (2017), 38–57.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. S.H. Chan, R. Mao, and R. Osburn, On recursions for coefficients of mock theta functions, Res. Number Thy. 1 (2015), 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  38. W.Y.C. Chen, K.Q. Ji, and E.H. Liu, Partition identities for Ramanujan’s third-order mock theta functions, Quart. J. Math. 63 (2012), 353–365.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Y.-S. Choi, Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook, Invent. Math. 136 (1999), 497–569.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Y.-S. Choi, Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook. IV, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 705–733.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Y.-S. Choi, Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook. III, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 94 (2007), 26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y.-S. Choi, The basic bilateral hypergeometric series and the mock theta functions, Ramanujan J. 24 (2011), 345–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Y.-S. Choi and B. Kim, Partition identities from third and sixth order mock theta functions, European J. Comb. 33 (2012), 1739–1754.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. L. Dragonette, Some asymptotic formulae for the mock theta series of Ramanujan, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1952), 474–500.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. W. Duke, Almost a century of answering the question: what is a mock theta function?, Not. Amer. Math. Soc. 61 (2014), 1314–1320.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. F.J. Dyson, A new symmetry of partitions, J. Comb. Thy. 7 (1968), 56–61.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. A. Folsom, What is …a mock modular form?, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 57 (2010), 1441–1443.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. A. Folsom, Kac–Wakimoto characters and universal mock theta functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), 439–455.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Folsom and K. Ono, Duality involving the mock theta function f(q), J. London Math. Soc. (2) 77 (2008), 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Folsom, K. Ono, and R.C. Rhoades, Mock theta functions and quantum modular forms, Forum of Math. Pi 1 (2013), 1–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. S.A. Garthwaite, The coefficients of the ω(q) mock theta function, Int. J. Number Thy. 4 (2008), 1027–1042.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. F.G. Garvan, Universal mock theta functions and two-variable Hecke–Rogers identities, Ramanujan J. 36 (2015), 267–296.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. B. Gordon and R.J. McIntosh, Some eighth order mock theta functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 62 (2000), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  54. B. Gordon and R.J. McIntosh, A survey of classical mock theta functions, in Partitions, q-Series and Modular Forms, K. Alladi and F. Garvan, eds., Develop. in Math. 23, 2011, Springer, New York, pp. 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. Griffin, K. Ono, and L. Rolen, Ramanujan’s mock theta functions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 110 (2013), 5765–5768.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. N.S.S. Gu and J. Liu, Families of multisums as mock theta functions, Adv. Appl. Math. 79 (2016), 98–124.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. D. Hickerson and E. Mortenson, Hecke-type double sums, Appell–Lerch sums and mock theta functions, I, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 109 (2014), 382–422.

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. Hickerson and E. Mortenson, Dyson’s Ranks and Appell–Lerch sums, Math. Ann. 367 (2017), 373–395.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  59. K. Hikami, Mock (false) theta functions as quantum invariants, Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 10 (2005), 509–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. K. Hikami, Transformation formula of the “second” order mock theta function, Lett. Math. Phys. 75 (2006), 93–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. F. Hirzebruch and D. Zagier, Intersection numbers of curves on Hilbert modular surfaces and modular forms of nebentypus, Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 57–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  62. Ö. Imamoğlu, M. Raum, and O.K. Richter, Holomorphic projections and Ramanujan’s mock theta functions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 (2014), 3961–3967.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. M.-J. Jang and S. Löbrich, Radial limits of the universal mock theta function g 3, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), 925–935.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. K. Ji and A.X.H. Zhao, The Bailey transform and Hecke–Rogers identities for the universal mock theta functions, Adv. Appl. Math. 65 (2015), 65–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. S.-Y. Kang, Mock Jacobi forms in basic hypergeometric series, Compos. Math. 145 (2009), 553–565.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. J. Lovejoy, On identities involving the sixth order mock theta functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), 2547–2552.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. J. Lovejoy and R. Osburn, q-hypergeometric double sums as mock theta functions, Pacific J. Math. 264 (2013), 151–162.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. J. Lovejoy and R. Osburn, The Bailey chain and mock theta functions, Adv. Math. 238 (2013), 442–458.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. R.J. McIntosh, Second order mock theta functions, Canad. Math. Bull. 50 (2) (2007), 284–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. R.J. McIntosh, On the universal mock theta function g 2 and Zwegers’ μ-function, Analytic Number Theory, Modular Forms and q-Hypergeometric Series (in Honor of Krishna Alladi’s 60th Birthday, University of Florida, Gainesville, March 2016), G.E. Andrews and F. Garvan, eds., Springer, 2018, pp. 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  71. E. Mortenson, On three third order mock theta functions and Hecke-type double sums, Ramanujan J. 30 (2013), 279–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. E. Mortenson, Eulerian series as modular forms revisited, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), 2379–2385.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. E. Mortenson, On the tenth-order mock theta functions, J. Australian Math. Soc. 104 (2018), 44–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. E. Mortenson, On ranks and cranks of partitions modulo 4 and 8, J. Combin. Thy. Ser. A 161 (2019), 51–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. K. Ono, Mock theta functions, ranks, and Maass forms, in Surveys in Number Theory, Dev. Math. 17, Springer, New York, pp. 119–141, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  76. H. Rademacher, The Fourier series and the functional equation of the absolute modular invariant J(τ), Amer. J. Math. 61 (1939), 237–248.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  77. R.C. Rhoades, On Ramanujan’s definition of mock theta functions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013), 7592–7594.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  78. Y. Sanada, A new identity relating mock theta functions with distinct orders, Tokyo J. Math. 29 (2006), 199–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  79. Y. Sanada, Some identities relating mock theta functions which are derived from denominator identity, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 51 (2009), 121–131.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. J.K. Sareen and M. Rana, Combinatorics of tenth-order mock theta functions, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 126 (2016), 549–556.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  81. D.P. Shukla and M. Ahmad, Bilateral mock theta functions of order “2r + 1” and their behaviour on the unit circle, Ganita 60 (2009), 27–56.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. A.K. Srivastava, Fifth and sixth order mock theta functions represented as 3 Φ 2, J. Indian Acad. Math. 31 (2009), 119–133.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. B. Srivastava, A comprehensive study of second order mock theta functions, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 42 (2005), 889–900.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  84. B. Srivastava, Modular transformations for Ramanujan’s tenth order mock theta functions, Kyungpook Math. J. 45 (2005), 211–220.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. M. Waldherr, On certain explicit congruences for mock theta functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 865–879.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  86. L. Wang, New congruences for partitions related to mock theta functions, J. Number Thy. 175 (2017), 51–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. L. Wang, Arithmetic properties of odd ranks and k-marked odd Durfee symbols, submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  88. G.N. Watson, The final problem: An account of the mock theta functions, J. London Math. Soc. 11 (1936), 55–80; reprinted in [68], pp. 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  89. G.N. Watson, The mock theta functions (2), Proc. London Math. Soc. 42 (1937), 274–304.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  90. A.J. Yee, Combinatorics of Andrews’s and Hill’s partition identities associated with mixed mock moduar forms (personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  91. D. Zagier, Vassilier invariants and a strange identity related to the Dedekind eta-function, Topology 40 (2001), 945–960.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  92. D. Zagier, Ramanujan’s mock theta functions and their applications (after Zwegers and Ono-Bringmann), Astérisque 326 (2009), 143–164.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms, Clay Math. Proc. 12 (2010), 1–17.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. S. Zwegers, Mock ϑ-functions and real analytic modular forms, Contemp. Math. 291 (2001), 269–277.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  95. S. Zwegers, Mock Theta Functions, Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. S. Zwegers, On two fifth order mock theta functions, Ramanujan J. 20 (2009), 207–214.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  97. S. Zwegers, The tenth-order mock theta functions revisited, Bull. London Math. Soc. 42 (2010), 301–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C. (2018). Recent Work on Mock Theta Functions. In: Ramanujan's Lost Notebook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77834-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics