Skip to main content

Outsourcing Reframed: Delivering on Collaborative Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Innovation in Outsourcing

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

Abstract

As we signaled in Chap. 1, there is a trend for outsourcing relationships to become increasingly managed and leveraged as strategic assets, with clients looking for business ideas, innovation and environmental scanning from their suppliers and a much greater focus on business, not just technical outcomes. The indicators of this can be found in research by, for example, Cullen (2009), Lacity et al. (2009) and Lacity and Willcocks (2009):

  • More rigorous planning and measurement of outsourcing relationships

  • More contracting based on values, behavior and client demand

  • Suppliers becoming more entrenched in their client’s business—including supporting the client’s mainline services

  • Suppliers becoming a client of the client and identifying new sales opportunities

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our definition of collaboration is consistent with strategy literature, but not with earlier outsourcing literature. See also Kern, T., and Willcocks, L.P. (2000). The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing and Management. Oxford University Press, London.

  2. 2.

    The definition was developed by Intel’s IT Innovation Group for in-house use. See Westerman, G., and Curley, M. (2008). “Building IT-Enabled Capabilities at Intel”. MIS Quarterly Executive, 7 (1): 33–48.

  3. 3.

    Weeks, M.R., and Feeny, D., 2008, ibid., pp. 127–146.

  4. 4.

    Examples include EDS-Xerox, IBM-Lend Lease, BAE-CSC and UBS-Perot Systems.

  5. 5.

    See also Cramm, S. (2007). “Does Outsourcing Destroy IT Innovation?”. HBR Blog Network, available at http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/cramm/2010/07/does-outsourcing-destroy-it-in.html 2010.

  6. 6.

    Mckeown, M., op. cit., 2008.

  7. 7.

    Information Technology Infrastructure Library, a set of concepts and practices for IT services management.

References

  • Cohen, L., and Young, A. (2005). Multisourcing: Moving Beyond Outsourcing to Achieve Growth and Agility. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, S. (2009). The Contract Scorecard. Gower, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., Leibold, M., and Voelpel, S. (2006). Strategic Management in the Innovation Economy. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R.A., and Bandula, J. (2004). “Information Systems Outsourcing: A Survey and Analysis for the Literature”. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 34 (4): 6–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J., and Seely Brown, J. (2005). The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R.A. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, T., and Blois, K. (2002). “Norm Development in Outsourcing Relationships”. Journal of Information Technology, 17 (1): 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, C., Ang, S., and Straub, D.W. (2004). “IT Outsourcing Success: A Psychological Contract Perspective”. Information Systems Research, 15 (4): 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., Khan, S.A., and Willcocks, L.P. (2009). “A Review of the IT Outsourcing Literature: Insights for Practice”. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18 (3): 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Khan, S., and Yan, A. (2016). “Review of the Empirical Business Services Sourcing Literature: An Update and Future Directions”. Journal of Information Technology, 31 (2): 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., Khan, S.A., Yan, A., and Willcocks, L.P. (2010). “A Review of the IT Outsourcing Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions”. Journal of Information Technology, 25 (4), pp. 395–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., and Willcocks, L.P. (2001). Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., and Willcocks, L.P. (2009). Information Systems and Outsourcing: Studies in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mckeown, M. (2008). The Truth About Innovation. Pearson Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overby, S. (2010). “Three Reasons Why Your Outsourcer Won’t Innovate”. CIO Magazine, July 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. (2007). “Today’s Solution and Tomorrow’s Problem: The Business Process Outsourcing Risk Management Puzzle”. California Management Review, 49(3), pp. 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, M. (2004). Information Technology Outsourcing and Business Innovation: An Exploratory Study of a Conceptual Framework. PhD thesis, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, M.R., and Feeny, D. (2008). “Outsourcing From Cost Management to Innovation and Business Value”. California Management Review, 50 (4): 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L.P., Cullen, S., and Craig, A. (2011). The Outsourcing Enterprise: From Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Windrum, P., Reinstaller, A., and Bull, C. (2009). “The Outsourcing Productivity Paradox: Total Outsourcing, Organizational Innovation, and Long Run Productivity Growth”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19 (2): 192–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Research Methodology

Appendix: Research Methodology

We studied 26 organizations between 2008 and 2011. These organizations were selected because of their considerable outsourcing experience and sourcing management maturity. They covered a range of major industry sectors and were drawn from medium, large and multinational corporations based in Europe, the US and Asia-Pacific. As shown in the table, five were achieving only IT operational innovations through new forms of collaboration. The other 21 were involved in deep collaboration that was delivering IT operational and business process innovation. Eight of these were also delivering strategic innovations.

Organization

Sector

Revenue, 2010 ($US)

Employees, 2010

No. of deals

Type of ITO/BPO innovation

Interviewees

KPN

Telecoms

$11b

34,000

4

O, P, S

Director of Innovation, IT Manager, Supplier Relationship Executive

Telco 1

Telecoms

$25b

43,000

5

O, P, S

CIO, Transformation Director, Supplier Executive, CFO

Telco 2

Telecoms

$65b

85,000

2

O, P, S

CIO, IT Relationship Manager, Supplier IT Executive

Telco 3

Telecoms

$6b

13,000

2

O, P

CIO, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Account Executive, Service Delivery Manager

Aero

Defense and aerospace

$31b

107,000

2

O, P

HR Director, IT Executive, Supplier Account Executive

Bank 1

Banking

$19b

44,000

3

O, P, S

CIO, Service Delivery Manager, Supplier Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Bank 2

Banking

$9.5b

38,000

4

O, P

CIO, IT Strategy Manager, Supplier Business Development Manager

Insure 1

Insurance

$44b

28,000

4

O, P

BPO Relationship Manager, Senior Contract Manager, Supplier Executive

Insure 2

Insurance

$9b

18,000

3

O

IT Development Manager, IT Operations Manager, two Supplier Executives

Insure 3

General insurance (market)

$5.4b (profit)

2500+

2

OP

CIO, IT Development Manager, Supplier Account Executive, Supplier Service Manager

StatoilHydro

Oil and energy

$85b

28,000

2

O, P, S

IT Senior Executive, Head of Service Delivery, IT Development Manager

Energy 1

Energy utility

$620m

2000+

2

O

IT Director, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Energy 2

Energy exploration

$15m operating loss

100+

1

O, P

IT Manager, Innovation Manager, Supplier Account Executive

Energy 3

Energy utility

$58b

88,000

3

O, P

IT Manager, General Manager, Supplier Operations Executive

Manu

Manufacturing

$10b

109,000

5

O

IT Director, Development Manager, two Supplier Executives

Distrib

Car components distribution

$650m

1100

2

O, P, S

IT Manager, Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Leisure

Gambling and leisure

$2.1b

5000+

1

O, P, S

IT Development Manager, IT Developer, Supplier Executive

Spring Global Mail

Postal services

$5.4b

11,000

4

O, P, S

IT Director, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Mail 1

Postal services

$4.8b

35,500

4

O, P

CIO, IT Architecture Manager, Supplier Executive, Supplier Operations Manager

Water 1

Water utility

$660m

1000+

1

O

IT Director, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Water 2

Water utility

$850m

1300+

2

O, P

CIO, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Public

Public sector financial

$14.4b (total resources)

1500+

1

O

Sourcing Director, Relationship Manager, Supplier Executive, CIO Supplier

Aviation

Airport authority

$3.7b

13,000

2

O, P

CIO, Project Director, two Supplier Executives

Health

Private sector healthcare

$1.2b

19,000

2

O, P

CIO, Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

Retail 1

Consumer electronics

$49b

180,000

1

O, P

IT Manager, HR Manager, Supplier Executive

Retail 2

General food consumer

$16b

101,000

2

O, P

CIO, IT Operations Manager, Supplier Executive

  1. O, IT operational innovation; P, process innovation; S, strategic innovation

For each organization, we interviewed at least three client and supplier stakeholders, all highly experienced outsourcing practitioners, about outsourcing models, possibilities and their actual practices. Follow-up interviews were carried out in late 2010 and early 2011 to gather the latest information on innovation outcomes. In total, we carried out 86 interviews and studied numerous supporting documents supplied by the participating organizations.

Analyzing the experiences of these 26 organizations enabled us to identify common themes, practices and principles, which we have distilled into the collaborative innovation process framework depicted in Fig. 2.2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Willcocks, L.P., Whitley, E.A. (2018). Outsourcing Reframed: Delivering on Collaborative Innovation. In: Willcocks, L., Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J. (eds) Dynamic Innovation in Outsourcing. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75352-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics