Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Historical Methods and the Study of How Organizations Manage the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Organizations Manage the Future

  • 919 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for the use of historical methods as a way of examining how organizations manage the future. Historical methods correspond to the study of the past through an analysis of historical documentation. This chapter offers an overview of the ontology of time and temporality and the epistemology of historical methods to explain how a focus on the past can help us to study how historical actors made sense of possible futures, how they enacted the(ir) future and how they organized for the future. It also covers some of the challenges of using historical documentation and presents principles that should be used when drawing on this type of evidence to study how organizations manage the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 2001. Strategy Is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company’s Future. New York: The Free Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Bridging History and Reductionism: A Key Role for Longitudinal Qualitative Research. Journal of International Business Studies 42 (5): 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, Kerstin. 2003. From Forecasting to Foresight Processes – New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting 22 (2–3): 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, Erwin. 2011. Trying to Become a Different Type of Company: Dynamic Capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal 32 (1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, Stephanie. 2013. The Silence of the Archives: Business History, Post-colonialism and Archival Ethnography. Management & Organizational History 8 (2): 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Mark, and Claire Norton. 2011. Doing History. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreborg, Karl H. 1996. Essence of Backcasting. Futures 28 (9): 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fear, Jeffrey. 2014. Mining the Past: Historicizing Organizational Learning and Change. In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 169–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, John Lewis. 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, Paul C., John Hassard, Ellen S. O’Connor, Michael Rowlinson, and Martin Ruef. 2016. What Is Organizational History? Toward a Creative Synthesis of History and Organization Studies. Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 590–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, Brian R. 1992. The Past Is the Past – Or Is It? The Use of Retrospective Accounts as Indicators of Past Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 35 (4): 848–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, Louis Reichenthal. 1969. Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method. New York: Random House Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Martha, and Walter Prevenier. 2001. From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, John, and William Ocasio. 2012. Architecture, Attention, and Adaptation in the Multibusiness Firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management Journal 33 (6): 633–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipping, Matthias, R. Daniel Wadhwani, and Marcelo Bucheli. 2014. Analyzing and Interpreting Historical Sources: A Basic Methodology. In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 305–329. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Giovanni. 2001. On Microhistory. In New Perspectives on Historical Writing, ed. Peter Burke, 97–119. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipartito, Kenneth. 2014. Historical Sources and Data. In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 284–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnússon, Sigurður Gylfi, and István M. Szijártó. 2013. What Is Micro History? Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Megill, Allan. 2007. Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plourde, Yves. 2015. Engaging with the Future: A Historical Investigation of Greenpeace. London: Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John B. 1988. Unlearning and Backcasting: Rethinking Some of the Questions We Ask About the Future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 33 (4): 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Future Subjunctive: Backcasting as Social Learning. Futures 35 (8): 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlinson, Michael. 2004. Historical Analysis of Company Documents. In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, ed. Catherine Cassel and Gillian Symon, 301–311. London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlinson, Michael, John Hassard, and Stephanie Decker. 2014. Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory. Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarpong, David. 2011. Towards a Methodological Approach: Theorising Scenario Thinking as a Social Practice. Foresight 13 (2): 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, Linda, and Charles Stubbart. 1985. Strategic Management in an Enacted World. Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 724–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, Mary, and Giovanni Gavetti. 2000. Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21 (10): 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, Eero, and Juha-Antti Lamberg. 2016. Taking Historical Embeddedness Seriously: Three Historical Approaches to Advance Strategy Process and Practice Research. Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 633–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, Kees. 2004. Afterword: Insights into Foresight. In Managing the Future: Strategic Foresight in the Knowledge Economy, ed. Hardimos Tsoukas and Jill Shepherd, 204–211. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwani, R. Daniel, and Marcelo Bucheli. 2014. The Future of the Past in Management and Organization Studies. In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 3–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Hayden V. 1987. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, Arnim, Lauren Withycombe Keeler, Vanessa Schweizer, and Daniel J. Lang. 2013. Plausibility Indications in Future Scenarios. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 9 (2/3/4): 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, April. 2011. Watch What I Do, Not What I Say: New Questions for Documents in International Business Case Research. In Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research, ed. Rebekka Piekkari and Catherine Welch, 361–382. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, JoAnne. 2014. Understanding Historical Methods in Organization Studies. In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 265–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HEC Montréal, Montréal, Canada

    Yves Plourde

Authors
  1. Yves Plourde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Hannes Krämer

  2. European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany

    Matthias Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Plourde, Y. (2018). Historical Methods and the Study of How Organizations Manage the Future. In: Krämer, H., Wenzel, M. (eds) How Organizations Manage the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74506-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation