Skip to main content

NATO’s Cold War Evolution: Civilisation from Referent Object to Standard

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NATO, Civilisation and Individuals

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

Civilisation proved to be a central concern in the deep origins and formation of the Alliance (Chap. 5), but how did that concern evolve afterwards? From its birth in 1949 to the end of the Cold War, NATO’s discourses show how the representation of civilisation, or civilised behaviour, suffered modifications through time, depending on the social priorities of given temporal periods. Across those decades, the Alliance evolved very aware of its time, consistently displaying reflexivity about its current pertinence in the world, what role it should play, what mission it should embrace. In this sense, the civilised habitus of the West was continued at the level of a democratic habitus. Ultimately, the evolution of NATO’s referent object reveals as an open process, in which both conscious and unconscious perceptions about Selfhood and time cohabit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Skinner highlights not only how our “inherited normative vocabularies” can shape our moral and social world, as how we are capable of changing our world when we change “the ways in which these vocabularies are applied” (1999: 63).

  2. 2.

    Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, the German Democratic Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, Greece, the Holy See, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Yugoslavia.

  3. 3.

    Secretary General of NATO from 1988 to 1994.

References

  • Armitage, J., & Virilio, P. (1999). From Modernism to Hypermodernism and Beyond: An Interview with Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(5–6), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Z., & Rauchhaus, R. (2011). Explaining NATO’s Resilience: Is International Relations Theory Useful? Contemporary Security Policy, 32(2), 286–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the Self Became a Problem: A Psychological Review of Historical Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1989). Gramática das Civilizações. Lisbon: Editorial Teorema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1995 [1977]). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (2nd ed.). Foreword by Stanley Hoffmann. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. (1964). The Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism. Clinton, MA: Colonial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caeiro da Matta, J. (1949, April 17). Remarks by José Caeiro da Matta, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Portugal. USA Department of State Bulletin, 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A., & Wallace, W. (2001). What Is NATO for? Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 43(4), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003 [1997]). Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, A. (2005). NATO in the “New Europe”: The Politics of International Socialization After the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gress, D. (1998). From Plato to NATO: The Idea of the West and Its Opponents. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, D. G. (2004). The Case of the Missing Democratic Alliance: France, the Anglo-Saxons and NATO’s Deep Origins. Contemporary Security Policy, 25(2), 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I. (2009). The Cold War: The Western European Perspective. In K. Larres (Ed.), A Companion to Europe Since 1945 (pp. 47–66). Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. (1998). NATO and the Future of European Security. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2004 [1979]). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (K. Tribe, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. (2009). The Soviet Bloc and the Cold War in Europe. In K. Larres (Ed.), A Companion to Europe Since 1945 (pp. 67–94). Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the Past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. (2003). The United States and Western Europe Since 1945: From Empire by Invitation to Transatlantic Drift. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C. C. (2005 [1994]). Hegemony and Autonomy Within the Western Alliance. In M. P. Leffler & D. S. Painter (Eds.), Origins of Cold War – An International History (2nd ed., pp. 221–236). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. C. (1947, June 5). The ‘Marshall Plan’ Speech. Harvard University. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://oecd.org

  • McNeill, W. (1963). The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1949, April 4). North Atlantic Treaty. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 28, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1954, October 6). Special Presentation of ‘Declaration of Atlantic Unity’ to Ministerial Meeting. Document C–M (54) 76, with Annexes A to E.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1956). Text of the Report of the Committee of Three on Non-Military Cooperation in NATO. Approved by the North Atlantic Council on 13 December 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1967, December 14). The Future Tasks of the Alliance: Harmel Report. Report of the Council, Annex to the Final Communiqué of the Ministerial Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1974, June 19). Declaration on Atlantic Relations Issued by the North Atlantic Council – The Ottawa Declaration. Retrieved May 29, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_26901.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1980, May 13–14). Final Communiqué of the Ministerial Session of the Defence Planning Committee. Brussels. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23055.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1982, June 10). Declaration of the Heads of State and Government at the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bonn, Germany. Retrieved May 29, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_65415.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1983, December 9). Declaration of Brussels Issued by the Foreign Ministers at the North Atlantic Council Meeting. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23216.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1988, March 2). Declaration of the NATO Heads of State and Government Participating of the North Atlantic Council. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23457.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1989a, May 29). The Alliance’s Comprehensive Concept of Arms Control and Disarmament. Retrieved May 29, 2015, from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23553.htm?selectedLocale=en

  • NATO. (1989b). NATO: Facts and Figures (11th ed.). Brussels: NATO Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, J. (2002). Conceptualizing the West in IR. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, J. (2009). Federalism and the Beginnings of European Union. In K. Larres (Ed.), A Companion to Europe Since 1945 (pp. 25–44). Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, Chapter 2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (2005 [1994]). Stalin and Soviet Foreign Policy. In M. P. Leffler & D. S. Painter (Eds.), Origins of Cold War – An International History (2nd ed., pp. 42–57). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1999). Rhetoric and Conceptual Change. Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought), 60–73. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/redescriptions/Yearbook%201999/Skinner%20Q%201999.pdf

  • The Atlantic Convention. (1962, January 8–20). Preparatory Recommendations to the Declaration of Paris. Elaborated in Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). (1975). Helsinki Final Act. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://www.osce.org/mc/39501?download=true

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, A. (2011). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorgbibe, C. (2002). Histoire de l’OTAN. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

da Mota, S. (2018). NATO’s Cold War Evolution: Civilisation from Referent Object to Standard. In: NATO, Civilisation and Individuals. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74409-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics