Skip to main content

Structural Reforms: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Reforms

Abstract

This chapter introduces the topic of structural reform, discussing the main potential benefits of reform (such as higher growth, productivity and employment; increased resilience of economies in case of adverse shocks; and a better functioning of the Economic and Monetary Union), different types of reform (notably labour and product market reform), several methodological issues that arise when analysing the effects of reform, like the endogeneity of reforms and the role of the effective lower bound, cyclical conditions and fiscal policy. The chapter ends with a discussion of the redistributional effects of reform and the political economy of reform.

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and should not be attributed to DeNederlandsche Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Since the early 1990s the rate of growth of productivity in the euro area has been lower than that in the United States (Van Ark 2014).

  2. 2.

    Bayoumi and Eichengreen (1993) show that before the start of the euro area there was a core of countries where shocks were highly synchronized, and a periphery where synchronization was significantly lower. However, in their update of the Bayoumi-Eichengreen study, Campos and Macchiarelli (2016) conclude that the core-periphery pattern has weakened. Likewise, some studies suggest that business cycles have become more synchronized within the euro area due to, inter alia, increasing trade relationships following monetary integration (see de Haan et al. 2008 for a discussion).

  3. 3.

    However, Galí and Monacelli (2016) question the importance of wage flexibility in a monetary union by arguing that lower interest rates via country-specific monetary policy are a key mechanism behind positive growth impacts of lower wage growth (or wage cuts), while such a monetary policy response is not possible for individual countries in a monetary union.

  4. 4.

    Financial liberalization may also spur financial development. Although there is substantive evidence that financial development may enhance growth, recent research suggests a non-linear relationship between financial development and economic growth for several reasons. At high levels of financial development, the further deepening of financial markets may be associated with financial services that have a lower growth potential, such as mortgage finance. Financial development may also be associated with a higher frequency of financial crises. Furthermore, the financial sector may attract human capital away from the real economy. Finally, financial development may lead to more income inequality.

  5. 5.

    This could be especially effective in a currency union. Farhi et al. (2014) demonstrate how such changes in taxes can act as a devaluation.

  6. 6.

    This implies that the authors ignore the effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy instruments in alleviating the effective lower bound.

  7. 7.

    The response of investments to credible structural reforms is also key in Gerali et al. (2015) who examine the effects of reform of the service sector in a small economy within a monetary union. They find that even in the context of the ELB such a reform increases GDP over the short-to-medium run and this effect critically hinges upon the response of investments. Likewise, Gomes (2014) finds that permanent structural reforms can help to alleviate the impact of the recession driving nominal interest rates towards the ELB, but reform coordination across member countries is necessary to reduce the time spent at the ELB.

  8. 8.

    Furthermore, the business cycle may not only affect the likelihood of a reform or shape the reform’s impact on macroeconomic outcomes, but also prompt a macroeconomic policy response which could affect the estimated impact of the reform (see below).

  9. 9.

    The redistributional consequences of structural reform have received limited attention in the literature. A clear exception is the impact of financial liberalization, which has been extensively researched; the results of the various studies are very mixed as de Haan and Sturm (2017) show in their review of the literature.

  10. 10.

    Also several other political-economy factors have been researched in the literature. For instance, Da Silva et al. (2017) examine for a sample of 40 OECD countries the driving forces of four main areas of reform: labour market, product market, framework conditions and FDI restrictions, taking some political-economy factors into account. Their results suggest that having one party with majority in all houses increases the likelihood of reform implementation, while the proximity to national elections or the political orientation of the government does not appear to influence reform implementation. See de Haan et al. (2006) for a discussion of older studies.

References

  • Abiad A, Mody A (2005) Financial reform: what shakes it? what shapes it? Am Econ Rev 95(1):66–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2004) Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-term growth. NBER Working Paper 10481

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Griffith R (2005) Competition and growth: reconciling theory and evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S (2004) Entry and productivity growth: evidence from micro-level panel data. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(2–3):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Drazen A (1991) Why are stabilizations delayed? Am Econ Rev 81(5):1170–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Glaeser E, Sacerdote B (2006) Work and leisure in the US and Europe. Why so different? NBER Macroecon Annu 2005(20):1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D, Barkbu B, Lusinyan L, Muir D (2014) Macroeconomic impact of structural reforms in the Euro Area. In: Jobs and growth: supporting the European recovery. IMF, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews D, Criscuolo C, Gal P (2016) The best versus the rest: the global productivity slowdown, divergence across firms and the role of public policy. OECD Productivity Working Paper 05

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball L, Mazumder S (2011) Inflation dynamics and the Great Recession. Brook Pap Econ Act 42(1):337–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1993) Shocking aspects of European monetary integration. In: Torres F, Giavazzi F (eds) Adjustment and growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg A, Ostry J D (2011) Inequality and unsustainable growth: two sides of the same coin? IMF Staff Discussion Note 11/08

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O (2016) The Phillips curve: back to the ’60s? Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 106(5):31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri T, Börsch-Supan A, Tabellini G (2002) Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 92(2):396–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouis R, Causa O, Demmou L, Duval R, Zdzienicka A (2012) The short-term effects of structural reforms: an empirical analysis. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 949

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlès R, Cette G, Lopez J, Mairesse J, Nicoletti G (2013) Do product market regulations in upstream sectors curb productivity growth? Panel data evidence for OECD countries. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1750–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumann S, Hermes N, Lensink R (2013) Financial liberalization and economic growth: a meta-analysis. J Int Money Financ 33:255–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos NF, Macchiarelli C (2016) Core and periphery in the European Monetary Union: Bayoumi and Eichengreen 25 years later. Econ Lett 147:127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cette G, Lopez J, Mairesse J (2016) Market regulations, prices, and productivity. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 106(5):104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A, Papaioannou E (2009) Human capital, the structure of production and growth. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):66–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan J, Sturm J-E (2017) Finance and income inequality: a review and new evidence. Eur J Polit Econ 50:171–195

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan J, Sturm J-E, Lundstrom S (2006) Market-oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: a critical survey. J Econ Surv 20(2):157–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan J, Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin RM (2008) Will business cycles in the euro area converge? a critical survey of empirical research. J Econ Surv 22:234–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias da Silva A, Givone A, Sondermann D (2017) What drives structural reform implementation? ECB Working Paper 2078

    Google Scholar 

  • Draghi M (2015) Structural reforms, inflation and monetary policy. Introductory speech by Mario Draghi, President of the ECB, ECB Forum on Central Banking Sintra, 22 May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C, Fitzenberger B, Schönberg U, Spitz-Oener A (2014) From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. J Econ Perspect 28(1):167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval R, Furceri D (2016) The effects of labor and product market reforms: the role of macroeconomic conditions and policies. IMF/Mimeo, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval R, Vogel L (2008) Economic resilience to shocks. The role of structural policies. OECD J Econ Stud 44(1):201–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertson G, Ferrero A, Raffo A (2014) Can structural reforms help Europe? J Monet Econ 61(C):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2018) Structural reforms in Europe, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabella VM (2017) Political-economic determinants of education reform: evidence on interest groups and student outcomes. Eur J Polit Econ 48:144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhi E, Gopinath G, Itskhoki O (2014) Fiscal devaluations. Rev Econ Stud 81:725–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez R, Rodrik D (1991) Resistance to reform: status quo bias in the presence of individual specific uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 81:1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde J (2014) Discussion of “Can structural reforms help Europe?” by G. Eggertsson, A. Ferrero, and A. Raffo. J Monet Econ 61(C):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde J, Guerrón-Quintana P, Rubio-Ramírez J (2011) Supply-side policies and the zero lower bound. NBER Working Paper 17543

    Google Scholar 

  • Galí J, Monacelli T (2016) Understanding the gains from wage flexibility: the exchange rate connection. Am Econ Rev 106(12):3829–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerali A, Notarpietro A, Pisani M (2015) Structural reforms and zero lower bound in a monetary union. Bank of Italy Working Paper 1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes S (2014) Euro area structural reforms in times of a global crisis. Banco de Portugal Working Paper 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes S, Jacquinot P, Pisani M (2012) The EAGLE. A model for policy analysis of macroeconomic interdependence in the Euro area. Econ Model 29(5):1686–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2017) World economic outlook. Washington, IMF

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaumotte F, Osorio Buitron C (2015) Inequality and labor market institutions. IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn L (2007) The impact of employment protection mandates on demographic temporary employment patterns: international microeconomic evidence. Econ J 117(521):F333–F356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuch K, Moshammer E, Pierluigi B (2016) Institutions, public debt and growth. ECB working Paper 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S (2003) Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Econ Policy 36:11–72

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) PISA 2015 results. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/

  • Oinonen S, Paloviita M (2014) Updating the euro area Phillips curve: the slope has increased. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 31/2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou D, Vourvachaki E (2017) Macroeconomic effects of structural reforms and fiscal consolidations: trade-offs and complementarities. Eur J Polit Econ 48:54–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet J (2017) What drives public acceptance of reforms? Longitudinal evidence from a Dutch pension reform. Public Choice 173(1–2):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitlik H, Wirth S (2003) Do crises promote the extent of economic liberalization? An empirical test. Eur J Polit Econ 19(3):565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Dev 22(9):1325–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarica B, Nobile N (2016) Revisiting the Eurozone Phillips curve. Oxford Econ Econ Outlook 40:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ark, B (2014) Total factor productivity: lessons from the past and directions for the future. BNB Working Paper 271

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel L (2017) Structural reforms at the zero bound. Eur J Polit Econ 48:74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakob de Haan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Haan, J., Parlevliet, J. (2018). Structural Reforms: An Introduction. In: de Haan, J., Parlevliet, J. (eds) Structural Reforms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74400-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics