Abstract
There is a small but theoretically important literature on ‘born-globals’ or international new venture firms that positions itself in contrast to the more established sequential international entry literature. In this paper we examine the pattern of entry into international markets for a set of international new ventures and show that they need not be a distinct breed of firms, as previous research has portrayed. Absent a specific technological advantage, the decision for a new venture to internationalize at inception is influenced by the size of its home market and by its production capacity, as well as by cultural and economic forces that also influence other more traditional firms that stage their entry into international markets. Most importantly, we demonstrate that the decision to internationalize or not should be considered jointly with the capacity allocation decision to specific international markets, as analysing these separately may lead to biased results.
Journal of International Business Studies (2007) 38, 1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400308
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An implicit assumption we make is that the products of the new venture under investigation exhibit non-increasing marginal cost of production.
- 2.
The increasing prevalence of domain-specific knowledge in the international business arena would therefore make the traditional notion of cultural distance appear less relevant (e.g., Bell, 1995).
- 3.
This assumes that large population centres translate into large potential markets.
- 4.
This assumes that the unit revenue derived from selling the product elsewhere within the country and/or neighbouring countries is similar, suggesting a fairly homogeneous product.
- 5.
The mimetic effect will be greater for firms that are similar in size. However, for de novo new ventures, this size-relatedness is less relevant as their incumbents are often many times larger their size.
- 6.
Haveman (1993) e stimated the inverted-U shape relationship based on entry rates. Our study deals with the pattern of market entry, and is hence subtly different from her hypothesis.
- 7.
Or, at least, similar technologies should be available to all firms – incumbents and new entrants alike.
- 8.
There are international gateway cities such as London and Frankfurt am Main, but passengers flying between, say, Lisbon and Copenhagen can probably enjoy non-stop service instead of having to connect via London or Frankfurt.
- 9.
A class of regional carrier exists in the EU with close operational and often financial ties to traditional flagcarriers (e.g., Crossair Europe/Europe Continental Airways was intended to be an EU arm of Crossair). We exclude these from our definition of independent, new entrants. We include, however, those carriers that operated as entities independent from their parent corporations, such as Go (initiated by British Airways) and Germanwings (by Eurowings-Lufthansa). Taking out the few independent offshoots of established carriers (such as Go and Germanwings) from the sample does not significantly change the result of the analysis.
- 10.
Since all the new carriers in our study face the same operational constraints at busy airports, the presence of this constraint does not place undue pressure for one carrier to internationalize at inception compared with another.
- 11.
Some new entrants positioned themselves to offer better service than the traditional flag-carriers.
- 12.
For instance, full-service carriers Swiss and Austrian Airlines at one point eliminated complimentary meal service in their intra-European operations and offered refreshments for sale in flight, resembling the offering of some of the budget carriers.
- 13.
References
Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. (2000). Influences of age at entry, knowledge-intensity and imitability on growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.
Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 151–166.
Bell, J. (1995). The internationalization of small computer software firms: A further challenge to “stage” theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29(8), 60–75.
Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter- and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 495–510.
Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2001). Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 177–189.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Tretheway, M. W. (1984). Economies of density versus economies of scale: Why trunk and local service airline costs differ. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 471–489.
Chang, S. J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 383–407.
Coval, J., & Moskowitz, T. (2001). The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 811–841.
Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.
Duranti, I., Ahearn, L., Cook-Gumperz, J., Gumperz, J., Darnell, R., Hymes, D., et al. (2003). Language as culture in US anthropology: Three paradigms. Current Anthropology, 44(3), 323–348.
Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management, 16, 187–221.
Erez, M., & Earley, C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Erramilli, M. K., Agarwal, S., & Kim, S. S. (1997). Are firmspecific advantages location-specific too? Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 735–757.
Fan, T. P.-C. (2006). Improvements in intra-European inter-city flight connectivity linking the United Kingdom and Ireland with continental Europe 1996–2004. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(4), 273–286.
Fan, T. P.-C., & Leung, W. F. R. (2005). Price disparity based on trip origins: Evidence on dense nonstop intercontinental air routes. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4(3), 252–269.
Ganitsky, J. (1989). Strategies for innate and adoptive exporters: Lessons from Israel’s case. International Marketing Review, 6(5), 50–65.
Greve, H. R. (1998). Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 967–988.
Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001). How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1053–1073.
Harveston, P. D., Kedia, B. L., & Davis, P. S. (2000). Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: The impact of the manager. Advances in Competitive Research, 8(1), 92–99.
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–162.
Hedlund, G., & Kverneland, A. (1985). Are strategies for foreign markets changing? The case of Swedish investment in Japan. International Studies of Management and Organization, 15(2), 41–59.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 286–316.
Hymer, S. H. (1960). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hymer, S. (1968). La Grande Firme Multinationale. Revue Economique, 14(6), 949–973.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–322.
Jolly, V. K., Alahuta, M., & Jeannet, J.-P. (1992). Challenging the incumbents: How high technology start-ups compete globally. Journal of Strategic Change, 1(2), 71–82.
Kandasaami, S. (1998). Internationalisation of small- and medium-sized born-global firms: A conceptual model. Crawley: Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia.
Kandasaami, S., & Huang, X. (2000). International marketing strategy of SMEs: A comparison of born-global vs non born-global firms in Australia. Presented at the 45th international conference on small business, Brisbane, Australia.
Knight, G. A. (1997). Emerging paradigm for international marketing: The born global firm. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michigan State University, Michigan.
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. In T. K. Madsen (Ed.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 8, pp. 11–26). New York: JAI Press.
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.
Lummaa, H. J. (2002). Internationalization behaviour of Finnishborn global companies. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.
Luo, Y., & Peng, M. W. (1999). Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 269–296.
Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6), 561–583.
Madsen, T. K., Rasmussen, E., & Servais, P. (2000). Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters. In A. Yaprak & H. Tütek (Eds.), Globalization, the multinational firm (Vol. 10, pp. 247–265). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 469–487.
McKinsey and Co. (1993). Emerging exporters: Australia’s high value-added manufacturing exporters. Melbourne: McKinsey and Company and the Australian Manufacturing Council.
Melin, L. (1992). Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special), 99–118.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mezias, S. J., Chen, Y.-R., Murphy, P., Biaggio, A., Chuawanlee, W., Hui, H., et al. (2002). National cultural distance as liability of foreignness: The issue of level of analysis. Journal of International Management, 8(4), 407–421.
Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 137–158.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Richard D Irwin.
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In R. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 276–320). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (1997). The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 279–307.
Phan, P. (2004). Entrepreneurship theory: Possibilities and future directions. Journal of Business Ventures, 19(5), 617–620.
Rennie, M. W. (1993). Global competitiveness: Born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45–52.
Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Knight, G. (2005). The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review, 14(1), 147–166.
Saky-Addo, K. (2003). US socks made in Africa. BBC News. [www document]. Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/3143354.stm
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.
Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2000). How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1227–1247.
Silverstein, M. (2004). ‘“Cultural” concepts and the language culture nexus. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 621–652.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 148–150). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 270–283.
Young, S. (1987). Business strategy and the internationalization process: Recent approaches. Managerial and Decision Economics, 8(1), 31–40.
Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–464.
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 189–219.
Zahra, S. A. (2005). A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 20–28.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). International entrepreneurship: The current status of the field and future research agenda. In M. Hitt, D. Ireland, D. Sexton, & M. Camp (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating an integrated mindset, strategic management series (pp. 255–288). Oxford: Blackwell.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the invaluable research and computing support of the Lee Kong Chiang School of Business at Singapore Management University, as well as the methodological advice offered by Paul Vaaler at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The excellent research assistance of Benjamin Jin-Ming Tan is graciously acknowledged. We acknowledge financial support from the John H. Broadbent Endowment for Research in Entrepreneurship in the Lally School of Management and Technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Finally, we thank Henk W. Volberda and three very helpful anonymous reviewers, as well as participants at the Pre-conference Development Workshop of the Annual Conference for Corporate Strategy in 2006, for their invaluable advice and suggestions. Omissions and errors are our responsibilities alone.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Accepted by Henk W Volberda, Guest Editor, 8 June 2007. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fan, T., Phan, P. (2018). International New Ventures: Revisiting the Influences Behind the ‘Born-Global’ Firm. In: Reuber, A. (eds) International Entrepreneurship. JIBS Special Collections. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74228-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74228-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74227-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74228-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)