Abstract
The EU is the pinnacle of modernity to some Turks, whilst something to be loathed by others. Although Turkey’s Islamic-rooted government pays lip service to joining the EU, very little progress has been achieved during its time in office. News of Britain’s EU referendum received mixed reactions in the Turkish press, depending on where the newspaper falls in Turkey’s deeply polarised political landscape. Throughout the Turkish press, coverage of foreign news is either ‘news stories’ sourced from Western news agencies or opinion pieces where more ‘home grown’ views of events are expressed. This chapter examines how a mainstream ‘oppositional’ online newspaper represented the EU referendum in opinion pieces. Using Critical Discourse Analysis, the chapter explores how stories of the referendum are used by the newspaper to express criticism about the government’s domestic and international affairs. I reveal how these criticisms are ideologically driven to the advantage of those associated with the newspaper, but do little in terms of informing the public of the foreign events that directly affect them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Academic
Abousnnouga, G., and D. Machin. 2010. Analysing the Language of War Monuments. Visual Communication 9 (2): 131–149.
Boratav, K. 2016. The Turkish Bourgeoisie Under Neoliberalism. Research and Policy on Turkey 1 (1): 1–10.
Chalaby, J.K. 1998. The Invention of Journalism. London: Macmillan.
Christensen, C. 2005. Breaking the News Concentration of Ownership, the Fall of Unions and Government Legislation in Turkey. Global Media and Communication 3 (2): 179–199.
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Hallin, D., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, G. 2012. A House Divided Against Itself: The Deteriorating State of Media Freedom in Turkey. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Silk Road Studies Program. http://www.genocidewatch.org/images/Turkey_12_Feb_6_A_house_divided_against_itself_.pdf (Accessed 5 August 2013).
Kocabaşoğlu, U. 1993. The Press Reform, 1919–1938 (Unpublished manuscript).
Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Education.
Mango, A. 1999. Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey. London: John Murray.
Özguneş, N., and G. Terzis. 2000. Constraints and Remedies for Journalists Reporting National Conflict: The Case of Greece and Turkey. Journalism Studies 1 (3): 405–426.
Richardson, J.E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Uzgel, İ., and B. Duru. 2010. AKP Kitabı Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara: Pheoenix Yayınevi.
Van Dijk, T.A. 1993. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.
van Leeuwen, T. 1995. Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society 6 (1): 81–106.
van Leeuwen, T. 1996. The Representation of Social Actors. In Texts and Practices—Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, and M. Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T., and R. Wodak. 1999. Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Way, L., and A. Akan. 2017. Coverage of Bombings for Political Advantage: Turkish On-Line News Reporting of the 2016 Ankara Attacks. Social Semiotics 27 (5): 545–566.
Way, L., and E. Kaya. 2015. Turkish Newspapers’ Role in Winning Votes and Exasperating Turkish-Kurdish Relations: The Ağrı Shootings. Discourse & Communication 10 (1): 82–100.
Way, L., G. Karanfil, and A. Ercifci. 2018. “See No Evil, Read No Evil”: The Failing Role of Turkish Newspapers in Coverage of Turkey’s 2016 Coup Attempt. Critical Discourse Studies.
Primary Sources
Commercial and Economic Relations Between Turkey and the UK. 2017. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/commercial-and-economic-relations-between-turkey-and-england.en.mfa (Accessed 11 November 2017).
Freedom of the press. 2016. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2016 (Accessed 5 September 2016).
Relations Between Turkey and the United Kingdom. 2017. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-the-united-kingdom.en.mfa (Accessed 22 November 2017).
Top Sites in Turkey. 2017. https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries;0/TR (Accessed on 23 November 2017).
Turkey: In Latest Escalation, 102 Media Outlets Closed by Decree. 2016. Reporters Without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/news/turkey-latest-escalation-102-media-outlets-closed-decree (Accessed 28 July 2016).
WAN-IFRA Calls on Turkish Gov’t to Respect Pluralism in Media. 2015. Hurriyet, June 1. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/wan-ifra-calls-on-turkish-govt-to-respect-pluralism-in-media.aspx?pageID=238&nID=83262&NewsCatID=339 (Accessed 21 February 2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Way, L.C.S. (2018). Turkish Newspapers: How They Use ‘Brexit’ for Domestic Political Gain. In: Ridge-Newman, A., León-Solís, F., O'Donnell, H. (eds) Reporting the Road to Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73682-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73682-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73681-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73682-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)