Skip to main content

Turkish Newspapers: How They Use ‘Brexit’ for Domestic Political Gain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reporting the Road to Brexit
  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

The EU is the pinnacle of modernity to some Turks, whilst something to be loathed by others. Although Turkey’s Islamic-rooted government pays lip service to joining the EU, very little progress has been achieved during its time in office. News of Britain’s EU referendum received mixed reactions in the Turkish press, depending on where the newspaper falls in Turkey’s deeply polarised political landscape. Throughout the Turkish press, coverage of foreign news is either ‘news stories’ sourced from Western news agencies or opinion pieces where more ‘home grown’ views of events are expressed. This chapter examines how a mainstream ‘oppositional’ online newspaper represented the EU referendum in opinion pieces. Using Critical Discourse Analysis, the chapter explores how stories of the referendum are used by the newspaper to express criticism about the government’s domestic and international affairs. I reveal how these criticisms are ideologically driven to the advantage of those associated with the newspaper, but do little in terms of informing the public of the foreign events that directly affect them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Academic

  • Abousnnouga, G., and D. Machin. 2010. Analysing the Language of War Monuments. Visual Communication 9 (2): 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boratav, K. 2016. The Turkish Bourgeoisie Under Neoliberalism. Research and Policy on Turkey 1 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalaby, J.K. 1998. The Invention of Journalism. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. 2005. Breaking the News Concentration of Ownership, the Fall of Unions and Government Legislation in Turkey. Global Media and Communication 3 (2): 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. 2012. A House Divided Against Itself: The Deteriorating State of Media Freedom in Turkey. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Silk Road Studies Program. http://www.genocidewatch.org/images/Turkey_12_Feb_6_A_house_divided_against_itself_.pdf (Accessed 5 August 2013).

  • Kocabaşoğlu, U. 1993. The Press Reform, 1919–1938 (Unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mango, A. 1999. Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özguneş, N., and G. Terzis. 2000. Constraints and Remedies for Journalists Reporting National Conflict: The Case of Greece and Turkey. Journalism Studies 1 (3): 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uzgel, İ., and B. Duru. 2010. AKP Kitabı Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara: Pheoenix Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.A. 1993. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. 1995. Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society 6 (1): 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. 1996. The Representation of Social Actors. In Texts and Practices—Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, and M. Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T., and R. Wodak. 1999. Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L., and A. Akan. 2017. Coverage of Bombings for Political Advantage: Turkish On-Line News Reporting of the 2016 Ankara Attacks. Social Semiotics 27 (5): 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L., and E. Kaya. 2015. Turkish Newspapers’ Role in Winning Votes and Exasperating Turkish-Kurdish Relations: The Ağrı Shootings. Discourse & Communication 10 (1): 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L., G. Karanfil, and A. Ercifci. 2018. “See No Evil, Read No Evil”: The Failing Role of Turkish Newspapers in Coverage of Turkey’s 2016 Coup Attempt. Critical Discourse Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Primary Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyndon C. S. Way .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Way, L.C.S. (2018). Turkish Newspapers: How They Use ‘Brexit’ for Domestic Political Gain. In: Ridge-Newman, A., León-Solís, F., O'Donnell, H. (eds) Reporting the Road to Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73682-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics