Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Follow-Up for NICU Graduates
  • 674 Accesses

Abstract

No longer is the success of care in the neonatal intensive care unit measured in terms of survival. As mortality statistics have continued to become more reassuring, success must now be measured in terms of morbidity. This effort should then be used to help the individual survivor and also be used to evaluate current NICU practices. The NICU follow-up clinic has been developed as a means to accomplish these dual goals. In fact, such a program is a requirement for a graduate medical education program in neonatal-perinatal medicine. There are, however, no clear guidelines to describe the optimal follow-up program and, for example, how to structure it, staff it, and pay for it. Other issues not delineated are which graduates are truly at risk and how long they should be followed. Finally, the relationship between the follow-up clinic and the medical home must be clarified in order to not fragment care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lyon, J. (1985). Playing god in the nursery. Don Mills, ON: Stoddart.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hess, J. H. (1953). Experiences gained in a thirty year study of prematurely born infants. Pediatrics, 11, 425–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drillien, C. M. (1958). Growth and development in a group of children of very low birth weight. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 33, 10–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. From an interview with William A. Silverman by Lawrence M Gartner in the Oral History Project in June 1997 through the Friends of Children Fund of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Academy of Pediatrics, Canadian Paediatric Society. (2002). Postnatal corticosteroids to treat or prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Pediatrics, 109, 330–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2010). Policy statement- Postnatal corticosteroids to prevent or treat bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics, 126, 800–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2014). Hypothermia and neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics, 133, 1146–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White, R. D., Smith, J. A., Shepley, M. M., et al. (2013). Recommended Standards for Newborn ICU Design, eighth edition. Journal of Perinatology, 33, S2–S16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Als, H., & McAnulty, G. B. (2011). The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) with Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC): Comprehensive Care for Preterm Infants. Current Women’s Health Reviews, 7(3), 288–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, A. F. (2003). Reflections on errors in neonatology: I. The ‘hands–off years, 1920–1950. Journal of Perinatology, 23, 48–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, A. F. (2003). Reflections on errors in neonatology: II. The ‘heroic years, 1950–1970. Journal of Perinatology, 23, 154–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson, A. F. (2003). Reflections on errors in neonatology: III. The “experienced” years, 1970–2000. Journal of Perinatology, 23(3), 240–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shonkoff, J. P., & Meisels, S. J. (1990). Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blair, C., & Ramey, C. T. (1997). Early intervention for low-birth-weight infants and the path to second-generation research. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Orton, J., Spittle, A., Doyle, L., et al. (2009). Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51, 851–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2013). ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  17. NICHHD, National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, and CDC workshop. (2004). Follow-up care of hi-risk infants. Pediatrics, 114, 1377–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Needelman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Needelman, H. (2018). Introduction. In: Needelman, H., Jackson, B. (eds) Follow-Up for NICU Graduates. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73275-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics