Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community Engagement in Energy Transition

A Qualitative Case Study

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Engaged Sustainability

  • 2682 Accesses

Abstract

Energy systems and their transition to more sustainable forms of production and consumption are of interest to researchers from multiple disciplines. Community-based enterprises and grassroots innovations play a crucial role in different aspects of these transitions. They possess considerable social capital and are able to assemble a social and/or environmental vision. Some of them seek market opportunities to take action in order to construct the economic basis that will further their vision in broader societal contexts. The collective nature of these entities may add to the effectiveness of their actions. A better understanding of such entities may help foster sustainability transitions in local communities and exploration of their wider influences on national and global scales. This research extends current literature on community-based entrepreneurship and grassroots innovations by investigating a New Zealand community-based enterprise, which created a network of actions and organizations that used bottom-up innovative ideas to respond to the local energy situation. Although their efforts have been partially unsuccessful to date, much can be learned from their experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. (1999). The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald Campbell (pp. 19–33). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2010). Entrepreneurship as social construction: A multilevel evolutionary approach. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (Vol. 5, pp. 387–427). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2015). Why aren’t entrepreneurs more creative? Conditions affecting creativity and innovation in entrepreneurial activity. In J. Zhou (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 445–456). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Yang, T. (2014). How do entrepreneurs know what to do? Learning and organizing in new ventures. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, R., Alhola, K., & Jääskeläinen, T. (2017). Experiments as a means towards sustainable societies–lessons learnt and future outlooks from a finnish perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S., Kunze, C., & Vancea, M. (2017). Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. A. (2008). ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, A., & Garzon, M. Q. (2012). Boundary objects to guide sustainable technology-supported participatory development for poverty alleviation in the context of digital divides. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 51, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blay-Palmer, A., Sonnino, R., & Custot, J. (2016). A food politics of the possible? Growing sustainable food systems through networks of knowledge. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boro, R., & Sankaran, K. (2017). Empathy driving engaged sustainability in enterprises: Rooting human actions in systems thinking. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2014). Sociotechnical transitions and urban planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRCT. (2017). Our settlements. Blueskin Resilient Communities Trust. Retrieved 6 Sep 2017, from http://www.brct.org.nz/about-us/our-settlements/

  • Breslin, D. (2008). A review of the evolutionary approach to the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. D., Cloke, J., & Mohr, A. (2017). Imagining renewable energy: Towards a social energy systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the Global South. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Edelman, L. F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research, purposeful and theoretical sampling; Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Boston: Now Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feola, G., & Butt, A. (2017). The diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability in Italy and Great Britain: An exploratory spatial data analysis. The Geographical Journal, 183(1), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Romanelli, E. (2012). Before identity: The emergence of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 23(3), 597–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R., Walton, S., Stephenson, J., Rees, D., Scott, M., King, G., … Wooliscroft, B. (2017). Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & Potts, J. (2006). Complexity, evolution, and the structure of demand. In M. McKelvey & M. Holmen (Eds.), Flexibility and stability in the innovating economy (pp. 99–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (2000). Can we trust trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations (Vol. 13, pp. 213–237). Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2004). Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 19–47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, E. (2017). Low-carbon economies (LCEs): International applications and future trends. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grabs, J., Langen, N., Maschkowski, G., & Schäpke, N. (2016). Understanding role models for change: A multilevel analysis of success factors of grassroots initiatives for sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P., … Vivekanandan, P. (2003). Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35(9), 975–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, R., Jääskeläinen, M., Maula, M., & Uotila, J. (2015). Emergence of industries: A review and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, T., Graf, A., Warbroek, B., Lammers, I., & Lepping, I. (2015). Local governments supporting local energy initiatives: Lessons from the best practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands). Sustainability, 7(2), 1900–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. (2016). Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 973–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvensivu, P. (2017). A post-fossil fuel transition experiment: Exploring cultural dimensions from a practice-theoretical perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(August), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, K. P. (1990). Secularism and people’s science movement in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(6), 311–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Gartner, W. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaire, M. (2014). Fashioning an industry: Socio-cognitive processes in the construction of worth of a new industry. Organization Studies, 35(1), 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2017). Mushroom packages: An ecovative approach in packaging industry. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koistinen, K., Teerikangas, S., Mikkilä, M., & Linnanen, L. (2017). Agent-based change in facilitating sustainability transitions: A literature review and a call for action. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, S., Berg, A., & Annala, M. (2017). Dynamics of experimental governance: A meta-study of functions and uses of climate governance experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016). Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy, 45(1), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. (2017). Moving forward with social responsibility: Shifting gears from why to how. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. J., & Upham, P. (2016). Grassroots social innovation and the mobilisation of values in collaborative consumption: A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Budd, L. (2015). Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy. Ecological Economics, 118, 240–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, D. G., & Carroll, G. R. (2001). On the genesis of organizational forms: Evidence from the market for disk arrays. Organization Science, 12(6), 661–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, A., & Hudon, M. (2015). Community currencies and sustainable development: A systematic review. Ecological Economics, 116, 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., Bould, N., Willis, S., Lawton, E., & Singh, A. (2015). The Blueskin and Karitane Food System Report. New Zealand: Dunedin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, A. (2009). Conceptual niche management of grassroots innovation for sustainability: The case of body disposal practices in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1026–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting sustainable development solutions: Frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(1), 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteous, D. (2013, March 1). Wind farm project tower goes up, Otago Daily Times. Retrieved from https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/wind-farm-project-tower-goes

  • Powell, W. W., & Sandholtz, K. W. (2012). Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 94–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi, P., & Sharma, R. (2017). Ecopreneurship for sustainable development: The bricolage solution. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsberger, K., Brudermann, T., Hatzl, S., Fleiß, E., & Posch, A. (2015). Photovoltaic diffusion from the bottom-up: Analytical investigation of critical factors. Applied Energy, 159, 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, T., Mitchell, V. A., & May, A. J. (2012). Bottom-up grassroots innovation in transport: Motivations, barriers and enablers. Transportation Planning and Technology, 35(4), 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. (2017). Beyond food provisioning: The transformative potential of grassroots innovation around food. Agriculture, 7(1), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S. (2017). Environmental stewardship: Achieving community cohesion through purpose and passion. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., & Pansera, M. (2017). Sustainability-driven innovation at the bottom: Insights from grassroots ecopreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Growing green money? Mapping community currencies for sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 86, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2016). What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, K. (2017, July 1). Residents voice angst over wind turbine site, Otago Daily Times. Retrieved from https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/residents-voice-angst-over-wind-turbine-site

  • Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2016). Grassroots innovation and innovation democracy. Brighton: University of Sussex, STEPS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Heiligenberg, H. A., Heimeriks, G. J., Hekkert, M. P., & van Oort, F. G. (2017). A habitat for sustainability experiments: Success factors for innovations in their local and regional contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S., Stephenson, J., & Day, R. (2012). Blueskin people power A toolkit for community engagement. Waitati/Otago: Blueskin Resilient Communities Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahraie, B., Everett, A. M., Walton, S., & Kirkwood, J. (2016). Environmental entrepreneurs facilitating change toward sustainability: A case study of the wine industry in New Zealand. Small Enterprise Research, 23(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiss, R. (2017). The importance of routines for sustainable practices: A case of packaging free shopping. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & White, S. (2016). Overcoming the liability of newness: Entrepreneurial action and the emergence of China’s private solar photovoltaic firms. Research Policy, 45(3), 604–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Liz Martyn for her suggestions that greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Management Office, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand

    Babak Zahraie

  2. Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    André M. Everett

Authors
  1. Babak Zahraie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André M. Everett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Zahraie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Woodbury University, Burbank, California, USA

    Joan Marques

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zahraie, B., Everett, A.M. (2018). Community Engagement in Energy Transition. In: Marques, J. (eds) Handbook of Engaged Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71312-0_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation