Skip to main content

Students’ Perceptions on Quality and Satisfaction in Higher Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 1318 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report the data found from an empirical study conducted in the service sector. It aims to assess the service quality and student satisfaction in higher private education university in Albania.

Methodology: The study is based on data gathered from the students of the faculty of Economics and Information Technology. The instrument used to assess service quality and student satisfaction is was self-administered questionnaire. A modified SERVPERF version was used to measure service quality. The SPSS and factorial analysis were used to measure the effect of each dimension of service quality on the quality perceived by the students. These analyses were also used to show the impact of service quality on student satisfaction.

Findings: The data show the effect of each dimension of service quality in quality assessment by the students. The statistical analysis demonstrates also the impact of each of them on student satisfaction.

Contribution: By offering an empirical assessment of significant variables of students’ perceptions, this study contributes to the existing literature on measuring important variables of students’ perception in higher education. The findings will help these institutions to understand how students consider different aspects of their activities and on improving the service they offer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2006). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 17(9), 1261–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aly, N., & Akpovi, J. (2001). Total quality management in California public higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3), 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., et al. (1997). Customer satisfaction, productivity and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Science, 16(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis and applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7/8), 811–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, E., & Sigala, M. (2002). Conceptualizing the measurement of service quality and TQM performance for hotels: The HOSTQUAL model. Acta Touristica, 14(2), 140–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger, T. S., & Sweeny, J. C. (2007). Service quality attributes weights: How do novices and longer-term customers construct service quality perceptions? Journal of Service Research, 10(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J., et al. (2008). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810848396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci, Y., et al. (2008). An extended model of the antecedents and consequences of consumer satisfaction for hospitality services. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 35–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firdaus, A. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for higher education. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The differential roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. E., Jr., et al. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning-Thurau, T., et al. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., et al. (2006). The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, N., et al. (2004). Measuring service quality of travel agents: Evidence from Northern Cyprus. The Service Industries Journal, 24(3), 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2011). Principles of marketing (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladhari, R., et al. (2011). Determinants of loyalty and recommendation: The role of perceived service quality, emotional satisfaction and image. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 16(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2011.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaTour, S. A., & Peat, N. C. (1979). Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research. In L. W. William (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (6th ed., pp. 431–440). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, S. M. C., et al. (2011). Corporate reputation, satisfaction, delight, and loyalty towards rural lodging units in Portugal. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. (2001). Services marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, P., & DelBosque, I. R. (2013). CSR and customer loyalty: The roles of trust, customer identification with the company and satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olorunniwo, F., & Hsu, M. K. (2006). A typology analysis of service quality, customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions in mass services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 16(2), 106–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., et al. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., et al. (1988). SERVQUAL a multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., et al. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F., & Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, 68, 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsinidou, M., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V., et al. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., et al. (1990). Delivering quality service. Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., et al. (2009). Service marketing, integrating customer focus across the firm (5th ed.). New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvira Tabaku .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tabaku, E. (2018). Students’ Perceptions on Quality and Satisfaction in Higher Education. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Goić, S., Polychronidou, P., Delias, P. (eds) Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70377-0_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics