Skip to main content

Professional, Methodical and Didactical Facets of ESD in a Masters Course Curriculum—A Case Study from Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Sustainability in the Curriculum of Universities

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Universities are expected to contribute to transforming societies towards sustainable development by proving transdisciplinary knowledge and to educate and prepare students for their future roles as decision-makers, entrepreneurs, and academics. The purpose of this chapter is to describe the integration of sustainability aspects into a master course program at a German university, to share experiences and to inform and motivate other educators to also “walk the talk”. The article provides insight into the approach taken to integrate sustainability aspects into the didactical concept such as the instrument of learning diaries or the implementation of problem-based learning modules. Furthermore the article introduces the specific way of quality assurance and evaluation which is used to structure the continual improvement of the master courses. It is shown on one hand, that the combination of all of these elements is necessary to ensure ESD in a holistic way. On the other hand this demands high standards of the lecturers, which is why a didactic consulting partnership was established to accompany this process with various offers for self-improvement, which are finally presented. Highlights of the papers are: a set of competencies of a sustainability manager and an overview to related modules in the study program, a description on pedagogical and didactical instruments (learning diaries, PBL related instruments such as case study work and theory-praxis transfers, colloquia with industry partners), insights into the approach of quality assurance and continual improvement (i.e. evaluation, several formats of didactical consultations).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The study programs differ just by an advanced semester. That’s why in this article the following descriptions applies to both master courses, only little distinctions are mentioned.

  2. 2.

    This was enabled by the project “Teaching practice in transfer (plus)” at the International Institute Zittau, a central academic unit of the TU Dresden.

References

  • AtKisson A (2010) The sustainability transformation: how to accelerate positive change in challenging times. Routledge, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ávila LC, Leal Filho W, Brandli L, MacGregor C, Molthan-Hill P, Özuyar PG, Moreira RM (2017) Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. J Clean Prod 164(2017):1268–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernado M, Gianni M, Gotzamani K, Simon A (2017) Is there a common pattern to integrate multiple management systems? A comparative analysis between organizations in Greece and Spain. J Clean Prod 151(2017):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davim JP, Leal Filho W (eds) (2016) Challenges in higher education for sustainability, management and industrial engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan G (2006) The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 12(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disterheft A, Caeiro S, Azeiteiro MU, Leal Filho W (2013) Sustainability science and education for sustainable development in universities: a way for transition. In: Caeiro S et al (eds) Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Springer, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Domingues P, Sampaio P, Arezes PM (2015) Analysis of integrated management systems from various perspectives. Total Qual Manag Bus Excellence 26(11–12):1311–1334. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.931064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edström K (2008) Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most. High Educ Res Dev 27(2):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EQF (2017) European Qualifications Framework. https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/content/descriptors-page

  • Goshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(1):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbarth C, Schaltegger S (2014) Educating change agents for sustainability e learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. J Clean Prod 62(2014):24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jickling B (2016) Losing traction and the art of slip-sliding away: or, getting over education for sustainable development. J Environ Educ 47(2):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jickling B, Wals A (2012) Debating education for sustainable development 20 Years after Rio: a conversation between Bob Jickling and Arjen Wals. In: ESD in Higher Education, the Professions and at Home, 6(1). Sage Publications, pp 49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapitulčinová D, AtKisson A, Perdue J, Will M (2017) Towards integrated sustainability in higher education—mapping the use of the Accelerator toolset in all dimensions of university practice. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karapetrovic S, Willborn W (1998) Integration of quality and environmental management systems. TQM Mag 10(3):204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen F (2001) Reflection on reflection. In: Korthagen FAJ, Kessels J, Koster B, Lagerwerf B, Wubbels T (eds) Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts W, Mulà I, Ceulemans K, Molderez I, Gaeremynck V (2013) The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programs in management. J Clean Prod 48:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts W, Van Petegem P (2016) The interrelations between competences for sustainable development and research competences. Int J Sustain High Educ 17(6):776–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts W, de Vall IMP, van den Haute H (2011) The integration of sustainability in competence based higher education. Using competencies as a starting point to achieve sustainable higher education. In: Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 25–29 October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansu A, Boon J, Sloep PB, van Dam-Mieras R (2013) Changing professional demands in sustainable regional development: a curriculum design process to meet transboundary competence. J Clean Prod 49:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo C, Zhexembayeva N (2011) Embedded sustainability: the next big competitive advantage. Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W (2011) About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. High Educ Policy 24:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W, Jim Wu Y, Brandli LL, Avila LV, Azeiteiro UM, Caeiro S, Madruga (2017) Identifying and overcoming obstacles to the implementation of sustainable development at universities. J Integr Environ Sci 14(1):93–108. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2017.1362007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Lozano F, Mulder K, Huisingh D, Waas T (2013) Advancing higher education for sustainable development: international insights and critical reflections. J Clean Prod 48:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Alonso-Almeida M, Huisingh D, Lozano FJ, Waas T, Lambrechts W, Lukman R, Hugé J (2015) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108(Part A):1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder K, Segalàs J, Ferrer-Balas D (2012) How to educate engineers for/in sustainable development: ten years of discussion, remaining challenges. Int J Sustain High Educ 13(3):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunhes T, Barbosa L, de Olivera J (2017) Identification and analysis of the elements and functions integrable in integrated management systems. J Clean Prod 142(2017):3225–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto B, Kistner S (2017) Is there a Matthew effect in self-regulated learning and mathematical strategy application?—Assessing the effects of a training program with standardized learning diaries. Learn Individ Differ 55:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda N (2010) Sailing on the winds of change. The Odyssey to sustainability of the University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling S, Scott W (2008) Higher education and ESD in England: a critical commentary on recent intiatives. Environ Educ Res 14(4):386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling S, Thomas I (2006) Education for sustainability: the role of capabilities in guiding university curricula. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1(4):349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoof A, Martens RL, van Merriėnboer JJG, Bastiaens TJ (2002) The boundary approach of competence: a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence. Human Resour Dev Rev 1(3):345–365 (Sage Publications)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stough T, Ceulemans K, Lambrechts W, Cappuyns V (2017) Assessing sustainability in higher education curricula: a critical reflection on validity issues. J Clean Prod 2017:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvestre P, McNeil R, Wright T (2013) From Talloires to Turin: a critical discourse analysis of declarations for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability 5:1356–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trif L, Popescu T (2013) The reflective diary, an effective professional training instrument for future teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93(2013):1070–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanski M, Leal Filho W (2014) Measuring sustainability at universities by means of Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating Systems (STARS): early findings from STARS data. Environ Dev Sustain 17(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh V, Mortelmans D, Spooren P, Van Petegem P, Gijbels D, Vanthournout G (2006) New assessment modes within project-based education—the stakeholders. Stud Educ Eval 32:345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waas T, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2010) University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J Clean Prod 18:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals A (2008) From cosmetic reform to meaningful integration: implementing education for sustainable development in higher education institutes—the state of affairs in six European countries. DHO, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals AJ (2012) Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full-length report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Commissioned by UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell J, Mullins G (1996) The use of student journals in problem-based learning. Med Educ 30(2):105–111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00727.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will M (2017) A sustainable company is possible—some case studies and a maturity model. In: Velazquez-Contreras L (ed) International sustainability stories: enhancing good practices. Universidad de Sonora

    Google Scholar 

  • Will M, Zenker-Hoffmann A, Brauweiler J, Delakowitz B, Riedel S (2015) Every end is a new beginning—a realignment and relaunch of an environmental management system at a German University following a 15 years maintaining period. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities. World sustainability series. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Will .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Will, M., Neumann, C., Brauweiler, J. (2018). Professional, Methodical and Didactical Facets of ESD in a Masters Course Curriculum—A Case Study from Germany. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Implementing Sustainability in the Curriculum of Universities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70281-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics