Abstract
This chapter focuses on the use of multiple corpora and word lists made from corpora to select ESP vocabulary and on the integration of that lexis into an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course. The first part of the chapter discusses the compilation of a corpus of medical textbooks in English which are commonly used in many Latin American countries, such as Venezuela, in undergraduate medical courses. A second corpus, this time of general English, was used as a comparison to the medical textbook corpus. Both corpora were analyzed for vocabulary load using Nation’s (2012) BNC/COCA lists, Coxhead’s AWL (2000) and Coxhead and Hirsh’s (2007) Science List. The study found that the first 3000 words constitute a vital set of vocabulary for ESP medical students at the beginning of their studies and that the vocabulary load of the medical textbooks is far greater than the loads of university texts (see Nation 2006). Bringing these corpus-based findings into ESP courses is an important task. The second part of the chapter discussed integrating these findings into an ESP course for medical students, using Nation’s (2013) framework of planning, strategy training, testing, and teaching vocabulary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bauer, L. (1993). The Wellington corpus of written New Zealand English. Wellington: Department of Linguistics/Victoria University of Wellington.
Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253.
Brinton, D., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Chen, Q., & Ge, G.-C. (2007). A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of Coxhead’s AWL word families in medical research articles (RAs). English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 502–514.
Chung, T. M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 103–116.
Cobb, T. M., & Horst, M. (2004). Is there room for an AWL in French? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 15–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
Coxhead, A. (2013). Vocabulary and ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 115–132). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
Coxhead, A. (2015). New ways in teaching vocabulary, revised. Alexandria: TESOL.
Coxhead, A., & Hirsh, D. (2007). A pilot science word list for EAP. Revue Francaise de Linguistique Appliqueé, 7(2), 65–78.
Coxhead, A., & Quero, B. (2015). Investigating a Science Vocabulary List in university medical textbooks. TESOLANZ Journal, 23, 55–65.
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2017). Evaluating lists of high-frequency words. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(2), 132–158.
Erten, İ. H., & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System, 36(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.005.
Fauci, A. S., Braunwald, E., Kasper, D. L., Hauser, S. L., Longo, D. L., Jameson, J. L., & Loscalzo, J. (2008). Harrison’s principles of internal medicine (17th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0071466339/information_center_view0/table_of_contents.html.
Ferguson, G. (2013). English for medical purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 343–261). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
File, K. (2014). Monitoring and positively reinforcing weekly vocabulary learning: A low-stakes vocabulary test. In A. Coxhead (Ed.), New ways in teaching vocabulary, revised (pp. 107–110). Alexandria: TESOL.
Fraser, S. (2007). Providing ESP learners with the vocabulary they need: Corpora and the creation of specialized word lists. Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education, 10, 127–143.
Fraser, S. (2009). Breaking down the divisions between general, academic, and technical vocabulary: The establishment of a single, discipline-based word list for ESP learners. Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education, 12, 151–167.
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015.
Goldman, L., & Ausiello, D. (Eds.). (2008). Cecil textbook of internal medicine (23rd ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/cecil-medicine/goldman-cecil-medicine-expert-consult/9781416028055/.
Heatley, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Coxhead, A. (2002). Range [Computer software]. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
Hirsh, D., & Coxhead, A. (2009). Ten ways of focussing on science-specific vocabulary in EAP. English Australia Journal, 25(1), 5–16.
Hsu, W. (2013). Bridging the vocabulary gap for EFL medical undergraduates: The establishment of a medical word list. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 454–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813494121.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1964). A standard corpus of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computers. (Brown corpus). Providence: Cooperative Research Program of the U.S. Office of Education and Brown University.
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Laurén & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 316–323). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Leech, G., Johansson, S., & Hofland, K. (1978). The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen corpus of British English for use with digital computers. (LOB corpus). Lancaster University, University of Oslo, University of Bergen: Longman Group Limited, the British Academy, Department of British and American Studies, University of Oslo, Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities, Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
Mair, C., & Ludwigs, A. (1999a). The Freiburg-Brown corpus (Frown corpus). Freiburg: Universität Freiburg.
Mair, C., & Ludwigs, A. (1999b). The Freiburg-LOB corpus (FLOB corpus). Freiburg: Universität Freiburg.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 63(1), 59–82.
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0.
Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). Information on the BNC/COCA lists (17 September 2012). Unpublished paper. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Information-on-the-BNC_COCA-word-family-lists.pdf
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Retrieved from http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027266279.
Peters, P., Collins, P., & Blair, D. (1986). The Australian corpus of English (ACE). Sydney: Macquarie University.
Porter, R. S., & Kaplan, J. L. (Eds.). (2011). The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy (19th ed.). Whitehouse Station: Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. Retrieved from http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/index.html.
Quero, B. (2015). Estimating the vocabulary size of L1 Spanish ESP learners and the vocabulary load of medical textbooks. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salager-Meyer, F., Llopis de Segura, G., & Guerra de Castro, R. (2016). EAP in Latin America. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London: Routledge.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2012). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484–503.
Shastri, S. V. (1986). The Kolhapur corpus of Indian English for use with digital computers (KCIE). Kolhapur: Department of English Shivaji University.
Tinkham, T. (1993). The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. System, 21(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90027-E.
Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897672376469.
Wang, J., Liang, S., & Ge, G. (2008). Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 442–458.
Waring, R. (1997). A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata (Occasional Papers of Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama), 1, 53–68.
Warrell, D. A., Cox, T. M., Firth, J. D., & Ogg, G. S. (Eds.). (2010). Oxford textbook of Medicine (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199204854.001.1/med-9780199204854.
West, M. P. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
Yang, M.-N. (2015). A nursing academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.05.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Top 100 GENM word types
the of and in to is a with or are for be as by may that an have can from not on at this most but these should has other which also been it more such associated than risk usually after if common often when because chapter high cause some | increased table cases severe levels who all include used during use no however although only including they there both their years low many present into type specific less occurs primary well those loss causes small agents studies due its response important days early within women effects individuals about without increase |
1.2 Top 100 MEDG word types
patients disease treatment therapy infection cells cell clinical patient blood diagnosis acute syndrome normal symptoms chronic renal occur pain infections one drug pulmonary result cancer lesions failure function liver dose disorders serum bone skin heart protein drugs two tissue pressure factors age first rate results deficiency seen host diseases acid | time lung see virus cardiac tumor factor gene care muscle hosts oral inflammatory manifestations secondary tumors respiratory hepatitis abnormalities receptor hypertension plasma positive mutations life human fluid elevated immune treated health body children anemia surgery infected vascular disorder addition doses volume ventricular injury adults brain peripheral medical diabetes genetic calcium |
1.3 Top 100 MED word types
systemic hepatic neurologic myocardial edema aortic asymptomatic ischemia cutaneous autosomal neuropathy proximal endocarditis pancreatic antigens stenosis pathogenesis lymphocytes acidosis ischemic idiopathic glucocorticoids airway hypotension pancreatitis prophylaxis vasculitis mucosal cytokines hemoglobin heparin physiologic mitral regimens tachycardia estrogen alveolar epithelial macrophages lupus lipid recessive pleural endothelial randomized dyspnea mucosa hypoglycemia pathobiology kinase | dementia thrombocytopenia corticosteroids metastases esophageal resection glomerular bilirubin bacteremia hemolytic parenteral extracellular neutrophils creatinine angiotensin histologic serologic pneumoniae nodules sarcoidosis hypercalcemia cortisol hemorrhagic cardiomyopathy sputum aldosterone endoscopic autonomic hypersensitivity cobalamin lymphadenopathy assays ataxia transcription anatomic folate pharmacologic hemolysis echocardiography intravascular subcutaneous immunocompromised immunoglobulin phenotype myeloma androgen colitis effusion hypothalamic malabsorption |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quero, B., Coxhead, A. (2018). Using a Corpus-Based Approach to Select Medical Vocabulary for an ESP Course: The Case for High-Frequency Vocabulary. In: Kırkgöz, Y., Dikilitaş, K. (eds) Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes in Higher Education. English Language Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70213-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70214-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)