Abstract
Applications like the Electrostatic Tractor (ET), remote sensing of space debris objects, or planetary science investigating asteroid charging, benefit from a touchless method to assess the electrostatic potential and charge distribution of another body. In the ET, accurate predictions of the force and torque between a passive space object and tug spacecraft are critical to ensure a robust closed loop control. This paper presents a novel, touchless method for determining both the voltage and a Multi-Sphere-Method (MSM) model which can be used to determine the charge distribution, force, and torque on a nearby space object. By means of potential probes, Remote Sensing for Electrostatic Characterization (RSEC) can be performed. Here the space tug shape and electrostatic potential is assumed to be known. The probes measure the departure from the expected potential field about the tug and determine an MSM model of the passive object’s potential distribution. This paper outlines a method for estimating the voltage and charge distribution of a neighboring charged spacecraft undergoing a planar rotation given measurements of voltage over a full rotation. Assuming knowledge of the tug spacecraft’s voltage and charge distribution, the rotation rate and distance to the debris, numerical simulation results illustrate that the constructed model of the debris can be characterized within a few percent error.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albuja, A.A.: Rotational dynamics of inactive satellites as a result of the YORP effect. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder (2015)
Ariafar, S., Jehn, R.: Long-term evolution of retired geostationary satellites. In: 4th European Conference on Space Debris, vol. 587, p. 681 (2005)
Bennett, T., Schaub, H.: Touchless electrostatic three-dimensional detumbling of large GEO debris. In: AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico (2014)
Bombardelli, C., Pelaez, J.: Ion beam shepherd for contactless space debris removal. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(3), 916–920 (2011)
Boyd, T., Sanderson, J.: The Physics of Plasmas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Bristow, J., Folta, D., Hartman, K.: A formation flying technology vision. AIAA Paper 5194, 19–21 (2000)
Chrystal, P., McKnight, D., Meredith, P.L., Schmidt, J., Fok, M., Wetton, C.: Space debris: on collision course for insurers? Technical Report, Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Zürich, Switzerland (2011)
Chubb, J.: Two new designs of ‘field mill’ type fieldmeters not requiring earthing of rotating chopper. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 26(6), 1178–1181 (1990)
Denton, M., Thomsen, M., Korth, H., Lynch, S., Zhang, J., Liemohn, M.: Bulk plasma properties at geosynchronous orbit. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110(A7) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010861
Farrell, W., Stubbs, T., Vondrak, R., Delory, G., Halekas, J.: Complex electric fields near the lunar terminator: the near-surface wake and accelerated dust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34(14) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029312
Gibson, W.: The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics. CRC, Boca Raton (2014)
Grard, R.: Properties of the satellite photoelectron sheath derived from photoemission laboratory measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 78(16), 2885–2906 (1973)
Hartzell, C.M.: The dynamics of near-surface dust on airless bodies. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder (2012)
Hogan, E., Schaub, H.: Relative motion control for two-spacecraft electrostatic orbit corrections. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(1), 240–249 (2012)
Hogan, E., Schaub, H.: Impacts of tug and debris sizes on electrostatic tractor charging performance. Adv. Space Res. 55(2), 630–638 (2015)
Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC): IADC space debris mitigation guidelines. Technical Report, IADC-02-01, Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (2007)
Jackson, T., Zimmerman, M., Farrell, W.: Concerning the charging of an exploration craft on and near a small asteroid. In: 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014)
Jin, J.: The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)
Jo, S., Kim, S., Park, T.: Equally constrained affine projection algorithm. In: Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, pp. 955–959 (2004)
Johnson, N.: Protecting the GEO environment: policies and practices. Space Policy 15(3), 127–135 (1999)
Kaplan, M., Boone, B., Brown, R., Criss, T., Tunstel, E.: Engineering issues for all major modes of in situ space debris capture. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, Anaheim (2010)
Kemp, R., Sellen, Jr. J.: Plasma potential measurements by electron emissive probes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 37(4), 455–461 (1966)
Mizera, P., Fennell, J., Croley, D., Gorney, D.: Charged particle distributions and electric field measurements from s3-3. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 86(A9), 7566–7576 (1981)
Moorer, D., Schaub, H.: Electrostatic spacecraft reorbiter. US Patent 8,205,838 B2 (2012)
Mullen, E., Gussenhoven, M.: Scatha survey of high-level spacecraft charging in sunlight. J. Geophys. Res. 91(A2), 1474–1490 (1986)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Satellite box score. Orbital Debris Q. News 20(1–2), 12–14 (2016)
Pfaff, R., Borovsky, J., Young, D.: Measurement Techniques in Space Plasmas: Particles. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC (1998)
Schaub, H., Jasper, L.: Circular orbit radius control using electrostatic actuation for 2-craft configurations. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 142, 681 (2011)
Schaub, H., Moorer, D.F.: Geosynchronous large debris reorbiter: Challenges and prospects. J. Astronaut. Sci. 59(1–2), 161–176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-013-0011-8
Secker, P., Chubb, J.: Instrumentation for electrostatic measurements. J. Electrost. 16(1), 1–19 (1984)
Seubert, C., Stiles, L., Schaub, H.: Effective coulomb force modeling for spacecraft in earth orbit plasmas. Adv. Space Res. 54(2), 209–220 (2014)
Stevenson, D., Schaub, H.: Multi-sphere method for modeling electrostatic forces and torques. Adv. Space Res. 51(1), 10–20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.08.014
Stevenson, D., Schaub, H.: Optimization of sphere population for electrostatic multi-sphere method. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 41(12), 3526–3535 (2013)
Ulamec, S., Biele, J.: Surface elements and landing strategies for small bodies missions–philae and beyond. Adv. Space Res. 44(7), 847–858 (2009)
Vasavada, H., Schaub, H.: Analytic solutions for equal mass four-craft static coulomb formation. J. Astronaut. Sci. 56(1), 17–40 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Engwerda, H.J.A., Hughes, J., Schaub, H. (2018). Remote Sensing for Planar Electrostatic Characterization Using the Multi-Sphere Method. In: Vasile, M., Minisci, E., Summerer, L., McGinty, P. (eds) Stardust Final Conference. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69956-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69956-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69956-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)