Abstract
The first complete Latin edition of Hippocrates’ Opera appeared in Rome in 1525, and in Greek in 1526. Separate translations of the most popular Hippocratic works were available earlier. The most important translations of the Hippocratic works on generation, those by Gorraeus and Cornarius, saw separate publication in 1545 and 1549. Both were extremely popular:
There are contradictions and inconsistencies in the ‘Hippocratic’ account. The works combine two distinct theories of the origin of the semen. In one, the semen derives from the brain and spinal cord, while in the other, the dominant one, it comes together from all, or the most important, parts of the bodies of the parents – the theory called pangenesis. Both parents contribute semen and there is no distinction made between the nature or importance of their contributions. The works most likely to have been taken by Renaissance doctors as epitomising Hippocrates’ ideas on generation, De genitura and De natura pueri, together with their companion-treatise, De morbis iv, are probably by the same author, and they present a relatively consistent account. Hippocrates’ explanation of generation is almost entirely mechanical. It requires no guidance by an intelligent, animated soul-substance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For Hippocratic texts cf. Littré, I, 373–9. For their history, cf. I, 502–10 (ancient texts and editions) 511–539 (manuscripts) and 540–554 (editions and translations). This is supplemented by the introduction to individual texts, especially VII, 467–9 for De genitura, De natura pueri and De morbis iv. Roger, op.cit., p.21. See also Appendix I, below.
- 2.
Lesky, op.cit., pp.1237, 1300 e.s.
- 3.
Hippocrates, De morbis iv: Littré, VII, 542, para.32. Translation mine.
- 4.
De genitura: Littré, VII, 484, para.11.
- 5.
Ibid., 478, 480, paras. 6–8; 482, para. 9 (blood supply); De mulieribus i: Littré, VIII, 64, para. 25; De natura pueri, 492, para. 14. Cited by Lesky, op.cit., 1327 e.s.
- 6.
De genitura: Littré, VII, 470, para. 1; 474, para. 3; 496–8, para. 17.
- 7.
Ibid., 498, para. 17.
- 8.
Ibid., 470, para. 1.
- 9.
De natura hominis: Littré, VI, 58, para. 11. Aristotle mentions this account among others in Historia animalium, Book III, iii, 512b 12-513a 7. The Platonic “spinal route” is given in Timaeus, 77 D.
- 10.
De genitura: Littré, VII, 472, para. 2. De aere, aequis et locis: Littré, II, 78–82, para. 22.
- 11.
De genitura: Littré, VII, 476, para. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deer Richardson, L., Goldberg, B. (2018). Hippocrates. In: Academic Theories of Generation in the Renaissance. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69334-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69336-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)