Abstract
Since the advent of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or traditional spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) by Norman Shealy in 1967, the evolution of dorsal column stimulation has continued, primarily focused on lead innovations. Disadvantages to current spinal cord stimulation strategies are inherent to how it works: it requires perceived congruent therapeutic paresthesia overlying the typical painful area. Challenges include the ability to place the paresthesia in congruent areas, the positionality associated with the required perception, and the need for the patient to consider the paresthesia therapeutic. New innovations in waveform strategies are moving away from the need to create a perceived paresthesia to achieve analgesia. This chapter explores one known as Burst Stimulation (Burst-SCS). It is important to appreciate that Burst-SCS was under investigation in the United States and required an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). Because of the success of the trial, it was deemed superior to tSCS for back and leg pain treatment and is now FDA approved and available for use in the United States.
Reference
Deer TR, Staats P. A result of the SUNBURST study: a prospective randomized controlled trial assessing burst stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain. Presented at the 19th annual meeting of the North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS) in Las Vegas, NV, 10–13 Dec 2015
Suggested Reading
de Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg. 2013;80:642–9.
de Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plaizer M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T. Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:986–90.
de Vos CC, Bom MJ, Vanneste S, Lenders MW, de Ridder D. Burst spinal cord stimulation evaluated in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic neuropathy. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:152–9.
Pope JE, Deer TR, Amirdelfan K, Kapural L, Verrills P. New concepts for waveform and current delivery for spinal cord stimulation: burst and high frequency. Minimally invasive surgery for pain; 2015.
Pope JE, Falowski S, Deer TR. Advanced waveforms and frequency with spinal cord stimulation: burst and high-frequency energy delivery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:431–7.
Schade CM, Sasaki J, Schultz DM, Tamayo N, King G, Johanek LM. Assessment of patient preference for constant voltage and constant current spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2010;13:210–7.
Washburn S, Catlin R, Bethel K, Canlas B. Patient-perceived differences between constant current and constant voltage spinal cord stimulation systems. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:28–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pope, J.E., Deer, T.R., Jassal, N.S. (2018). Burst Stimulation: An Innovative Waveform Strategy for Spinal Cord Stimulation. In: Diwan, S., Deer, T. (eds) Advanced Procedures for Pain Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68841-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68841-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68839-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68841-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)