1 Core Message
In the production and processing of leather and in the manufacture of shoes, various allergenic and irritating substances are used.
Occupational skin disease is infrequently reported in these branches.
The most important allergens are chromium salts, p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin, rubber chemicals, and various biocides.
Many possible allergens are not available for routine diagnostics, so sensitization may be overlooked.
Residuals of allergens in leather or shoes also pose a risk for the consumer.
2 Introduction
Manufacturing leather is a process consisting of several subsequent steps which should be known in detail to the occupational dermatologist, because every step is characterized by a particular chemistry, adding up to a variety of exposures and possible skin hazards. Manufacturing shoes does not only involve leather and glues but also various chemicals, of which several may cause a skin disease.
3 Manufacture of Leather
Leather is made from the dermis of...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams RM (1990) Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 45, 662–663, 667–669
Aerts O, Meert H, Romaen E, Leysen J, Matthieu L, Apers S, Lambert J, Goossens A (2016) Octylisothiazolinone, an additional cause of allergic contact dermatitis caused by leather: case series and potential implications for the study of cross-reactivity with methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 75:276–284
Aerts O, Goossens A, Lambert J, Lepoittevin JP (2017) Contact allergy caused by isothiazolinone derivatives: an overview of non-cosmetic and unusual cosmetic sources. Eur J Dermatol 27:115–122
Ancona A, Serviere L, Trejo A, Monroy F (1982) Dermatitis from an azo-dye in industrial leather protective shoes. Contact Dermatitis 8:220–221
Angelini G, Vena GA, Meneghini CL (1980) Shoe contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 6:279–283
Anonymous (2012) Commission regulation (EU) No 412/2012 of 15 May 2012 amending annex XVII to regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union 16.5.2012. L 128/1. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/412/oj/eng (last accessed 26 Jun 2017)
Anonymus (2009) Commission decision of 17 March 2009 requiring member states to ensure that products containing the biocide dimethylfumarate are not placed or made available on the market (2009/251/CE). Official Journal of the European Union 20.3.2009. L 74/32. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:074:0032:0034:EN:PDF (last accessed 25 Mar 2010)
Bajaj AK, Gupta SC, Chatterjee AK, Singh KG (1991) Shoe dermatitis in India: further observations. Contact Dermatitis 24:149–151
Basketter D, Horev L, Slodovnik D, Merimes S, Trattner A, Ingber A (2001) Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. Contact Dermatitis 44:70–74
Bregnbak D, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Menné T, Johansen JD (2015) Association between cobalt allergy and dermatitis caused by leather articles – a questionnaire study. Contact Dermatitis 72:106–114
Bregnbak D, Thyssen JP, Jellesen MS, Zachariae C, Johansen JD (2016) Experimental skin deposition of chromium on the hands following handling of samples of leather and metal. Contact Dermatitis 75:89–95
Bregnbak D, Opstrup MS, Jellesen MS, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP (2017) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cobalt in leather – clinical cases. Contact Dermatitis 76:366–368
Bruze M (1986) Sensitizers in PTBP-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 14:132–133
Bruze M, Björkner B, Lepoittevin JP (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159
Bulikowski W, Tyras H (1976) Dermatological evaluation of occupational exposure of tanners to chromium compounds. Berufsdermatosen 24:132–137
Calnan CD, Cronin E (1978) Vegetable tans in leather. Contact Dermatitis 4:295–296
Castanedo-Tardan MP, Gelpi C, Jacob SE (2008) Allergic contact dermatitis to CrocsTM. Contact Dermatitis 58:248–249
Cavelier C, Foussereau J (1995) Kontaktallergie gegen Metalle und deren Salze. Teil I Chrom Chromate Dermatosen Occup Environ 43:100–112
Chowdhuri S, Ghosh S (2007) Epidemio-allergological study in 155 cases of footwear dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 73:319–322
Corazza M, Lauriola MM, Mantovani L, Virgili A (2006) Allergic contact dermatitis due to orthopedic shoes and a prosthesis for an amputated foot. Contact Dermatitis 55:115–117
Correia S, Menezes Brandao F (1986) Contact dermatitis of the feet. Derm Beruf Umwelt 34:102–106
Cronin E (1966) Shoe dermatitis. Brit J Dermatol 78:617–625
Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 68–76
Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:423–434
Dyro FM (1978) Methyl ethyl ketone polyneuropathy in shoe factory workers. Clin Toxicol 13:371–376
Estlander T, Kanerva L, Jolanki R (1990) Occupational allergic dermatoses from textile, leather, and fur dyes. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1:13–20
Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (2000) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from trivalent chromium in leather tanning. Contact Dermatitis 43:114
Estlander T, Kanerva L, Talola P, Jolanki R, Soini M (2001) Aziridine hardener – a new sensitizer in the dyeing of leather. Contact Dermatitis 44:107–109
Febriana SA, Jungbauer F, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ (2012a) Inventory of the chemicals and the exposure of the workers’ skin to these at two leather factories in Indonesia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:517–526
Febriana SA, Jungbauer F, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ (2012b) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and patch test results of leather workers at two Indonesian tanneries. Contact Dermatitis 67:277–283
Febriana SA, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ (2014) Occupational skin hazards and prevalence of occupational skin diseases in shoe manufacturing workers in Indonesia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:185–194
Febriana SA, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar ML (2015) Contact allergy in Indonesian patients with foot eczema attributed to shoes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29:1582–1589
Fisher AA (1991) Shoe dermatitis in a rosin-(colophony) sensitive individual. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:209–210
Fogh A, Pock-Steen B (1992) Contact sensitivity to thiram in wooden shoes. Contact Dermatitis 27:348
Foussereau J, Cavelier C, Selig D (1976) Occupational eczema from para-tertiary-butylphenol formaldehyde resins: a review of the sensitizing resins. Contact Dermatitis 2:254–258
Foussereau J, Benezra C, Maibach HI (1982) Occupational contact dermatitis. Clinical and chemical aspects. Munksgaard, Kopenhagen, pp 256–259. 342–345
Foussereau J, Muslmani M, Cavelier C, Herve Bazin B (1986) Contact allergy to safety shoes. Contact Dermatitis 14:233–236
Freeman S (1997) Shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 36:247–251
Fregert S (1975) Occupational dermatitis in a 10-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1:96–107
Fregert S (1981) Chromium valencies and cement dermatitis. Brit J Dermatol 105(Suppl. 21):7–9
Fuchs T, Geier J, Nickolaus G (1996) Ungewöhnliche Manifestation einer Chromatallergie. Allergo J 5 (Sonderausgabe 1):33
Geier J, Nickolaus G, Fuchs T (1995) Durch Lederschuhe provozierte Psoriasis pustulosa plantaris bei Chromatallergie. Allergologie 18:433–435
Geldof BA, Roesyanto ID, van Joost T (1989) Clinical aspects of para-tertiary-butylphenolformaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) allergy. Contact Dermatitis 21:312–315
Gellin GA (1990) Pigmentary changes. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 21–25
Giménez-Arnau A, Silvestre JF, Mercader P, de la Cuadra J, Ballester I, Gallardo F, Pujol RM, Zimerson E, Bruze M (2009) Shoe contact dermatitis from dimethyl fumarate: clinical manifestations, patch test results, chemical analysis, and source of exposure. Contact Dermatitis 61:249–260
Grimalt F, Romaguera C (1975) New resin allergens in shoe contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1:169–174
Hamann D, Hamann CR, Kishi P, Menné T, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP (2016) Leather contains cobalt and poses a risk of allergic contact dermatitis: cobalt indicator solution and x-ray florescence spectrometry as screening tests. Dermatitis 27:202–207
Hansen MB, Rydin S, Menné T, Johansen JD (2002) Quantitative aspects of contact allergy to chromium and exposure to chrome-tanned leather. Contact Dermatitis 47:127–134
Hansen MB, Johansen JD, Menné T (2003) Chromium allergy: significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermatitis 49:206–212
Hansen MB, Menné T, Johansen JD (2006a) Cr(III) reactivity and foot dermatitis in Cr(VI) positive patients. Contact Dermatitis 54:140–144
Hansen MB, Menné T, Johansen JD (2006b) Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in leather and elicitation of eczema. Contact Dermatitis 54:278–282
Haslam E (1989) Plant polyphenols. Vegetable tannins revisited. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Hausen B (1981) Woods injurious to human health. de Gruyter, Berlin
Hausen BM (1994) A case of allergic contact dermatitis due to metanil yellow. Contact Dermatitis 31:117–118
Hausen BM (1997) Lexikon der Kontaktallergene, Ergänzungslieferung, 4th edn. ecomed Verlag, Landsberg
Hedberg YS, Lidén C (2016) Chromium(III) and chromium(VI) release from leather during 8 months of simulated use. Contact Dermatitis 75:82–88
Hedberg YS, Lidén C, Odnevall Wallinder I (2015) Chromium released from leather -I: exposure conditions that govern the release of chromium(III) and chromium(VI). Contact Dermatitis 72:206–215
Heidemann E (1990) Leather. In: Elvers B, Hawkins S, Schulz G (eds) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, vol A 15, 5th edn. VCH, Weinheim, pp 259–282
Henschel R, Agathos M, Breit R (2002) Occupational contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis 47:52
Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ (2005) 10 years’ experience of patch testing with a shoe series in 230 patients: which allergens are important? Contact Dermatitis 53:37–39
Jelen G, Cavelier C, Protois JP, Foussereau J (1989) A new allergen responsible for shoe allergy: chloroacetamide. Contact Dermatitis 21:110–111
Jung JH, McLaughlin JL, Stannard J, Guin JD (1988) Isolation, via activity-directed fractionation, of mercaptobenzothiazole and dibenzothiazyl disulfide as 2 allergens responsible for tennis shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 19:254–259
Koch P, Nickolaus G (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis and mercury exanthem due to mercury chloride in plastic boots. Contact Dermatitis 34:405–409
Koch P, Nickolaus G, Geier J (1996) Kontaktallergien bei Lederherstellern, Lederverarbeitern und in der Schuindustrie. Fünf-Jahres-Analyse auf der Grundlage von Daten des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken. Derm Occup Environ 44:257–262
Lammintausta K, Zimerson E, Hasan T, Susitaival P, Winhoven S, Gruvberger B, Beck M, Williams JD, Bruze M (2010) An epidemic of furniture-related dermatitis: searching for a cause. Brit J Dermatol. 162:108–116
Lynde CW, Warshawski L, Mitchell JC (1982) Patch test results with a shoewear screening tray in 119 patients, 1977–80. Contact Dermatitis 8:423–425
Malten KE (1958) Occupational eczema due to para-tertiary butylphenol in a shoe adhesive. Dermatologica 117:103–109
Malten KE, Seutter E (1985) Allergenic degradation products of para-tertiary butylphenolformaldehyde plastic. Contact Dermatitis 12:222–224
Malten KE, van Aerssen RGL (1962) Kontaktekzeme durch Leime bei Schuhmachern und Schuhträgern. Berufsdermatosen 10:264–268
Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Berdondini RM (1996) Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 34:17–22
Minkin W, Cohen HJ, Frank SB (1971) Contact dermatitis to east Indian leather. Arch Derm 103:522–523
Müller C, Hausen BM (1994) Contact allergy to a synthetic tannin in Tannosynt® liquid. Contact Dermatitis 31:185
Nardelli A, Taveirne M, Drieghe J, Carbonez A, Degreef H, Goossens A (2005) The relation between the localization of foot dermatitis and the causative allergens in shoes: a 13-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis 53:201–206
Nishioka K, Murata M, Ishikawa T, Kaniwa M (1996) Contact dermatitis due to rubber boots worn by Japanese farmers, with special attention to 6-ethoxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (ETMDQ) sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 35:241–245
Nygren O, Wahlberg JE (1998) Speciation of chromium in tanned leather gloves and relapse of chromium allergy from tanned leather samples. Analyst 123:935–937
Onder M, Atahan AC, Bassoy B (2004) Foot dermatitis from the shoes. Int J Dermatol 43:565–567
Oosterhaven JA, Febriana SA, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar ML (2017) Results of patch testing in Indonesian shoe factory workers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31:e15–e17
Oumeish OY, Rushaidat QM (1980) Contact dermatitis to military boots in Jordan. Contact Dermatitis 6:498
Oztas P, Polat M, Cinar L, Alli M (2007) Shoe dermatitis from para-tertiary butylphenol formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 56:294–295
Podmore P (1995) Shoes. Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ: Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd edn, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 516–526
Rani Z, Hussain I, Haroon TS (2003) Common allergens in shoe dermatitis: our experience in Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol 42:605–607
Rantanen T (2008) The cause of the Chinese sofa/chair dermatitis epidemic is likely to be contact allergy to dimethyl fumarate, a novel potent contact sensitizer. Br J Dermatol 159:218–221
Reich G, Taeger T (2009) Vom Kollagen tierischer Häute zum Werkstoff Leder. Chemikalien für die Lederherstelung. Chem Unserer Zeit 43:28–36
Rietschel RL, Fowler JF (1995) Fisher’s contact dermatitis, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 392–413
Roberts JL, Hanifin JM (1979) Athletic shoe dermatitis. J Am Med Assoc 241:275–278
Romaguera C (1987) Shoe contact dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 26:532–535
Samitz MH, Katz SA (1964) A study of the chemical reactions between chromium and skin. J Invest Dermatol 43:35–42
Schubert H, Agatha G (1979) Zur Allergennatur der para-tert. Butylphenolformaldehydharze. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27:49–52
Scutt RWB (1966) Chrome sensitivity associated with tropical footwear in the royal navy. Brit J Dermatol 78:337–343
Skoet R, Olsen J, Mathiesen B, Iversen L, Johansen JD, Agner T (2004) A survey of occupational hand eczema in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 51:159–166
Spruit D, van Neer FCJ (1966) Penetration rate of Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Dermatologica 132:179–182
Stein G (1992) Chromatsensibilisierung durch Leder. Derm Beruf Umwelt 40:110–112
Strauss RM, Wilkinson SM (2002) Shoe dermatitis due to colophonium used as leather tanning or finishing agent in Portuguese shoes. Contact Dermatitis 47:59
Susitaival P, Winhoven SM, Williams J, Lammintausta K, Hasan T, Beck MH, Gruvberger B, Zimerson E, Bruze M (2010) An outbreak of furniture related dermatitis (‘sofa dermatitis’) in Finland and the UK: history and clinical cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 24:486–469
Suurmond D, Verspijck Mijnssen GAW (1967) Allergic dermatitis due to shoes and a leather prothese. Dermatologica 134:371–378
Teixeira M, Machado S, Teixeira A, Silva E (2005) Severe contact allergy to footwear in a young child. Contact Dermatitis 52:159–160
Thorstensen (1995) Leather. In: Kroschwitz JI (ed) Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology, vol 15, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 159–177
Thyssen JP, Jensen P, Carlsen BC, Engkilde K, Menné T, Johansen JD (2009) The prevalence of chromium allergy in Denmark is currently increasing as a result of leather exposure. Brit J Dermatol 161:1288–1293
Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Jellesen MS, Møller P, Sloth JJ, Zachariae C, Menné T (2013) Consumer leather exposure: an unrecognized cause of cobalt sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 69:276–279
Verma GK, Sharma NL, Mahajan VK, Tegta GR, Shanker V (2007) Purpuric contact dermatitis from footwear. Contact Dermatitis 56:362–364
Vidovic R, Kansky A (1985) Contact dermatitis in workers processing polyvinyl chloride plastics. Derm Beruf Umwelt 33:104–105
Wagner G, Wezel G (1966) Art und Häufigkeit hautschädigender Berufsnoxen in Schleswig-Holstein. Berufsdermatosen 14:1–40
Wardenbach P, Henter A, Kollmeier H (1989) Kontaktekzeme und Krebserkrankungen durch Chrom, Nickel und deren Verbindungen. Eine Auswertung der BK-DOK 1978 bis 1984. Zbl Arbeitsmed 39:186–190
Warshaw E, Schram SE, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Maibach HI, Marks JG Jr, Mathias T, Pratt MD, Rietschel RL, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Zug KA (2007) Shoe allergens: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001–2004. Dermatitis 18:191–202
Williams JD, Coulson IH, Susitaival P, Winhoven SM (2008) An outbreak of furniture dermatitis in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 159:233–234
Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000) Contact allergy to 5,5′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-dibenzyl ethers, sensitizers in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 43:20–26
Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002a) Contact allergy to the monomers in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 47:147–153
Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002b) Low-molecular-weight contact allergens in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermatitis 13:190–197
Zimerson E, Sörensen Ö, Bruze M (2002) Contact allergy to trimers in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Exog Dermatol 1:207–216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Geier, J., Lessmann, H. (2020). Leather and Shoes. In: John, S., Johansen, J., Rustemeyer, T., Elsner, P., Maibach, H. (eds) Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68615-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68617-2
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine