Skip to main content

Diagnostic Competency: Basis for Your Assessment and Grading

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning How to Teach Mathematical Modeling in School and Teacher Education
  • 1325 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is, from my point of view, the hardest one. Why? The diagnostic dimension is the fourth and last part of the model for teaching competencies. Thus you need all your knowledge from the previous chapters to focus now in more detail on diagnosis during modeling activities. However this is not really the hard thing that I mean. I think a hidden dimension could rather be all the discussions about assessment, especially regarding mathematical educational standards, which influence your view on this aspect. Mathematical modeling has to be assessed as one of the practices in the Common Core Standards Mathematics in the United States for example. The same goes for Germany, where it has been practiced for 14 years now. The goal for me is to convince you that assessment in this context is not a bad thing like it is promoted in the media. So assessment should have advantages neither for your students nor for your mathematics teaching, because it is also a tool for diagnosis.

How can I assess mathematical modeling?

Karen, in-service teacher

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 15–30). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schukajlow, S., Blum, W., Messner, R., Pekrun, R., Leiß, D., & Müller, M. (2009). Unterrichtsformen,erlebte Selbständigkeit, Emotionen und Anstrengungen als Prädiktoren von Schülerleistungen bei anspruchsvollen mathematischen Modellierungsaufgaben. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 37(2), 164–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2013). Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borromeo Ferri, R. (2018). Diagnostic Competency: Basis for Your Assessment and Grading. In: Learning How to Teach Mathematical Modeling in School and Teacher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68072-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68072-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68071-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68072-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics