Abstract
The primary goal of the presented book has been to answer the question of what has driven the Chinese assertive policies in the South China Sea. Throughout the text, the main focus has been put on the dominant ‘power shift’ theory. Producing relevant answers required a set of steps—to establish the theoretical basis with regard to the assertive China discourse, to develop a conceptualization of power suitable for the analysis, to conduct a detailed description of the events which took place in the SCS in the relevant period, to assess China’s power by following the presented conceptual requirements, and to link the findings about China’s power to China’s assertive policies in the SCS. Furthermore, after showing that the main hypothesis does not explain the assertive policies sufficiently, the discussion about the validity of the alternative hypotheses was presented, which in the end produced a complete theory of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS.
The concluding part of the book consists of two sections. Firstly, summaries of all the findings and assertions from each chapter of the book will be presented, including the findings regarding the validity of the main and alternative hypotheses. Secondly, the outcomes of the research will be discussed from a broader perspective. In particular, it will be discussed what the findings tell us about China’s power, Chinese foreign policy, and Indo-Pacific politics in general and what the takeaways of the research are in terms of the suggested concept of power and its demonstrative application. Finally, a brief postscript will discuss how the new Trump administration in the USA might affect the complex power dynamics in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Actually, a point can be made that the results of some assertive actions might prove to be the game-changer in the race for strategic control of the South China Sea. This can well be the case with the reclamation and construction works at the Chinese outposts and their subsequent militarization. However, the primary goal of the book was not to evaluate the outcomes of the assertive actions but rather to establish what caused them.
- 2.
A discussion about the Chinese international relations thinking and its cultural aspects, which are embedded in the concept of strategic culture, is developed in Turcsányi (2014).
- 3.
For a thorough discussion about the Chinese domestic debate about the concept of the peaceful rise, see Mierzejewski (2012).
- 4.
- 5.
This was suggested by Friedberg (2015).
- 6.
- 7.
The concept of the ‘veto-power’ system was developed in Kaplan (2005).
- 8.
- 9.
References
Bloomberg. (2017, May 29). Trans-pacific partnership can succeed without the U.S. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-28/the-trans-pacific-partnership-can-succeed-without-the-u-s
Blumenthal, D. (2010, October 21). What happened to China’s “peaceful rise”? Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/10/21/what-happened-to-chinas-peaceful-rise/
Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016, April 13). The once and future superpower. Why China won’t overtake the United States. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-04-13/once-and-future-superpower
Chen, D., & Wang, J. (2011). Lying low no more. China’s new thinking on the Tao Guang Yang Hui strategy. China: An International Journal, 9(2), 195–216.
East Asia Forum. (2017, July 10). Japan opens the way to cooperation on China’s Belt and Road Initiative. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/07/10/japan-opens-the-way-to-cooperation-on-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/
Engelhardt, T. (2017, June 13). Donald Trump might set a record—For the biggest decline of American power in history. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/donald-trump-might-set-a-record-for-the-biggest-decline-of-american-power-in-history/
Fels, E. (2017). Shifting power in Asia-Pacific? The rise of China, Sino-US competition and regional middle power allegiance. Cham: Springer.
Friedberg, A. L. (2015, Winter). The sources of Chinese conduct: Explaining Beijing’s assertiveness. The Washington Quarterly, pp. 133–150.
Gerson, M. (2017, April 21). Trump’s hard-hearted budget weakens American power, USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/04/21/trumps-hard-hearted-budget-weakens-american-power/100704906/
Kaplan, M. A. (2005). System and process in international politics. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
Mierzejewski, D. (2012). The peaceful-rise concept and the internal debate. In H. Lai & Y. Lu (Eds.), China’s soft power and international relations. London: Routledge.
Neack, L. (2008). The new foreign policy. Power seeking in a globalized era. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
NPR. (2017, April 29). Ambassador says, so far, Trump administration is a ‘reassertion of America power’. http://www.npr.org/2017/04/29/526205006/ambassador-says-so-far-trump-administration-is-a-reassertion-of-america-power
O’Hanlon, M. E., & Rivlin, A. M. (2017, April 4). Trump must recognize that national power goes beyond the military. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/04/04/trump-must-recognize-that-national-power-goes-beyond-the-military/
Panda, A. (2017, June 28). Asian publics lose confidence in the United States in the Trump Era. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2017/06/asian-publics-lose-confidence-in-the-united-states-in-the-trump-era/?utm_content=bufferc0de1&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Viking.
Pinker, S., Thayer, B. A., Levy, J. S., & Thompson, W. R. (2013). Edited by N. P. Gleditsch. The forum: The decline of war. International Studies Review, 15, 396–419.
Raap-Hooper, M. (2016, March 21). China’s short-term victory in the South China Sea. And its long-term problem. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2016-03-21/chinas-short-term-victory-south-china-sea
Scobell, A., & Harold, S. W. (2013). An assertive China? Insights from interviews. Asian Security, 9(2), 111–131.
Shambaugh, D. (2002). Modernizing China’s military. Progress, problems, and prospects. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Szczudlik-Tatar, J. (2010). Soft power in China’s foreign policy. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 19(3), 45–68.
Tellis, A. J., Tanner, T., & Keough, J. (Eds.). (2012). Strategic Asia 2011–12: Asia responds to its rising powers – China and India. Seattle and Washington, DC: National Bureau of Asia Research.
Thayer, B. A. (2005). Confronting China: An evaluation of options for the United States. Comparative Strategy, 24(1), 71–98.
Thayer, B. A. (2010). The continued relevance of realism in the age of Obama: Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose. American Foreign Policy Interests, 32, 1–4.
Turcsányi, R. (2014). Strategic culture and foreign policy thinking in People’s Republic of China. Czech Journal of Political Science, 1, 60–75.
Wike, R., Stokes, B., Poushter, J., & Fetterolf, J. (2017, 26 June). Image suffers as publics around world question Trump’s leadership. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/06/26/u-s-image-suffers-as-publics-around-world-question-trumps-leadership/
Yan, X. (2006). The rise of China and its power status. Chinese Journal of Political Science, 1(5), 5–33.
Yan, X., & Qi, H. (2012). Football game rather than boxing match: China–US intensifying rivalry does not amount to cold war. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5(2), 105–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turcsányi, R.Q. (2018). Conclusion. In: Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Global Power Shift. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67648-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67648-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67647-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67648-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)