Skip to main content

Preserving Bibliographic Relationships in Mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME 2.0

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL 2017)

Abstract

In the environment of the World Wide Web large volumes of library data have been published following different conceptual models. The navigation through these volumes and the data interlinking require the development of mappings between the conceptual models. Library conceptual models provide constructs for the representation of bibliographic families and the relationships between Works. A key requirement for successful mappings between different conceptual models is to preserve such content relationships. This paper studies a set of cases (Work with single Expression, Work with multiple Expressions, translation, adaptation) to examine if and how bibliographic content relationships and families could be preserved in mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME 2.0. Even though, relationships between Works of the same bibliographic family may be preserved, the progenitor Work is not always represented in BIBFRAME after mappings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smiraglia, R., Leazer, G.: Derivative bibliographic relationships: the work relationship in a global bibliographic database. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50, 493–504 (1999). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:6<493::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-U

  2. Coyle, K.: Future considerations: the functional library systems record. Libr. Hi Tech. 22, 166–174 (2004). doi:10.1108/07378830410524594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mimno, D., Crane, G., Jones, A.: Hierarchical catalog records - Implementing a FRBR catalog. D-Lib Mag. 11, 1–9 (2005). doi:10.1045/october2005-crane

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: The Elements of Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Arastoopor, S., Fattahi, R., Parikosh, M.: Developing user-centered displays for literary works in digital libraries: integrating bibliographic families, FRBR and users. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Asian Special Libraries ICoASL. Special Libraries Association - Asian Chapter, Tokyo, pp 83–91 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merčun, T., Žumer, M., Aalberg, T.: FrbrVis: an information visualization approach to presenting FRBR work families. In: Zaphiris, P., Buchanan, G., Rasmussen, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) TPDL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7489, pp. 504–507. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Smiraglia, R.P., Heuvel, C.V.D.: Classifications and concepts: towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction. J. Doc. 69, 360–383 (2013). doi:10.1108/JD-07-2012-0092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Merčun, T., Žumer, M., Aalberg, T.: Presenting bibliographic families: Designing an FRBR-based prototype using information visualization. J. Doc 72, 490–526 (2016). doi:10.1108/JD-01-2015-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Urban, R.J.: Representation patterns for cultural heritage resources. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting 50, 1–4 (2013). doi:10.1002/meet.14505001123

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aalberg, T., Vennesland, A., Farrokhnia, M.: A pattern-based framework for best practice implementation of CRM/FRBRoo. In: Morzy, T., Valduriez, P., Bellatreche, L. (eds.) ADBIS 2015. CCIS, vol. 539, pp. 438–447. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23201-0_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic Relationships: Toward a Conceptual Structure of Bibliographic Information used in Cataloging, Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships. In: Bean, C.A., Green, R. (eds.) Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol. 2, pp. 19–35. Springer, Dordrecht (2001). doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9696-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett’s taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 48, 130–143 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smiraglia, R.: Authority control and the extent of derivative bibliographic relationships. Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Chicago, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zapounidou, S., Sfakakis, M., Papatheodorou, C.: Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web: a comparison of four conceptual models. J. Inf. Sci. (2016). doi:10.1177/0165551516650410

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bennett, R., Lavoie, B.F., O’Neill, E.T.: The concept of a work in WorldCat: an application of FRBR. Libr. Collect. Acquis. 27, 45–59 (2003). doi:10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00306-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zapounidou, S., Sfakakis, M., Papatheodorou, C.: Highlights of library data models in the era of linked open data. In: Garoufallou, E., Greenberg, J. (eds.) MTSR 2013. CCIS, vol. 390, pp. 396–407. Springer, Cham (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03437-9_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. BIBFRAME - Bibliographic Framework Initiative: BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification (Draft - 5 May 2014). Library of Congress, Washington, DC. http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-profiles.html

  19. Tillett, B.: What is FRBR?: A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. Washington, D.C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The University of Chicago Library. Homer in Print: The Transmission and Reception of Homer’s Works, Chapter VII The Children’s Homer. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/webexhibits/homerinprint/everyone.html

  21. Svenonius, E.: The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. lcnetdev/marc2bibframe2. Convert MARC records to BIBFRAME2 RDF. https://github.com/lcnetdev/marc2bibframe2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Zapounidou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zapounidou, S., Sfakakis, M., Papatheodorou, C. (2017). Preserving Bibliographic Relationships in Mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME 2.0. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67007-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67008-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics