Skip to main content

Patient Specific Implants from a 3D Printer – An Innovative Manufacturing Process for Custom PEEK Implants in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrializing Additive Manufacturing - Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications - AMPA2017 (AMPA 2017)

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is rapidly gaining acceptance in healthcare. Computer-assisted planning of surgical procedures, fabrication of anatomical 3D models, and patient specific implants are well-established processes at the author’s department. Surgical planning and medical 3D printing are firmly integrated technologies in the clinical course of treatment at the University Hospital Basel.

Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has been observed, mainly in Cranio-maxillofacial surgery, Spine-, Neuro- and Hand surgery, as a reliable alternative to materials such as titanium for the production of patient-specific implants. The manufacture of medical PEEK implants has been limited mainly to subtractive manufacturing processes such as Computerized Numerical Control (CNC) milling. This production method leads to significant limitations as opposed to AM. 3D printing of PEEK allows construction of almost any complex geometry such as hollow implant bodies or implants in lightweight bio-mimicking design which cannot be manufactured using other technologies.

Recently, it has become possible to process PEEK in the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) method, which opens up a number of innovative options for medical-surgical use. With the latest PEEK 3D printers which are now available, inexpensive and compact production intervals for custom implants are conceivable.

Although the medical certification of this workflow is a challenge, the fabrication of patient-specific implants in the operating room in the near future could be possible. In this article, the possibilities and limitations of the production of patient-specific implants from PEEK by 3D printing methods are described, as well as the recent experiences in the field of 3D printing of PEEK implants.

This research project is based on a collaboration of the above-mentioned research institutes and the Apium Additive Technologies GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany; Brando Okolo, Uwe Popp et al.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ventola, C.L.: Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. PT 39(10), 704–711 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoang, D., Perrault, D., Stevanovic, M., Ghiassi, A.: Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann. Transl. Med. 4(23), 456 (2016). doi:10.21037/atm.2016.12.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickens, P.M., Stangroom, R., Greul, M., Holmer, B., Hon, K.K.B., Hovtun, R., Neumann, R., Noeken, S., Wimpenny, D., et al.: Conversion of RP models to investment castings. Rapid Prototyp. J. 1(4), 4–11 (1995). doi:10.1108/13552549510104401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zein, I., Hutmacher, D.W., Tan, K.C., Teoh, S.H.: Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23(4), 1169–1185 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Novakova-Marcincinova, L., Kuric, I.: Basic and advanced materials for fused deposition modeling rapid prototyping technology. Manuf. Ind. Eng. 11(1), 1338–6549 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chia, H.N., Wu, B.M.: Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J. Biol. Eng. 9, 4 (2015). doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, M.M., Boahene, K.D.O., Byrne, P.J.: Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 11(1), 53–57 (2009). doi:10.1001/archfaci.11.1.53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rigby, R.B.: Polyetheretherketone. In: Margolis, J.M. (ed.) Engineering Thermoplastics: Properties and Applications, pp. 299–314. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1985). doi:10.1002/pol.1986.140240616

    Google Scholar 

  9. Najeeb, S., Khurshid, Z., Matinlinna, J.P., Siddiqui, F., Nassani, M.Z., Baroudi, K.: Nanomodified peek dental implants: bioactive composites and surface modification - a review. Int. J. Dent. 2015, 381759 (2015). doi:10.1155/2015/381759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dérand, P., Rännar, L.E., Hirsch, J.M.: Imaging, virtual planning, design, and production of patient-specific implants and clinical validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 5(3), 137–144 (2012). doi:10.1055/s-0032-1313357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Petzold, R., Zeilhofer, H.F., Kalender, W.A.: Rapid prototyping technology in medicine- basics and applications. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 23(5), 277–284 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0895-6111(99)00025-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guevara-Rojas, G., Figl, M., Schicho, K., Seemann, R., Traxler, H., Vacariu, A., et al.: Patient- specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 72(9), 1801–1812 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Relvas, C., Reis, J., Potes, J.A., Fonseca, F.M., Simões, J.A.: Rapid manufacturing system of orthopedic implants. Rev. Bras. Ortop. 44(3), 260–265 (2015). doi:10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30077-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, H.L., Porter, R.S.: Melting behavior of poly (ether ether ketone) in its blends with poly (etherimide). J. Polym. Res. 31(12), 1845–1850 (1993). doi:10.1002/polb.1993.090311217

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vaezi, M., Yang, S.: Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10(3), 123–135 (2015). doi:10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thieringer, F., Popp, U., Okolo, B., Schumacher, R., Honigmann, P.: Custom Implants for Humans from a 3-D Printer – An Innovative Manufacturing Process for Custom PEEK Implants. Kunststoffe international, April 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian M. Thieringer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thieringer, F.M., Sharma, N., Mootien, A., Schumacher, R., Honigmann, P. (2018). Patient Specific Implants from a 3D Printer – An Innovative Manufacturing Process for Custom PEEK Implants in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. In: Meboldt, M., Klahn, C. (eds) Industrializing Additive Manufacturing - Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications - AMPA2017. AMPA 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66865-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66866-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics