Skip to main content

The Moderator Effect of Previous Dissatisfaction with Service Category on Co-Creation with Consumers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Back to the Future: Using Marketing Basics to Provide Customer Value (AMSAC 2017)

Abstract

Whether to develop products and services or to solve consumption problems, co-creation objective is to create value. Most previous research has emphasized consumer’s participation as co-creator of products and services, the co-creation effects on business performance, and the participants’ evaluations of the co-created output. Conversely, the perspective of the consumer who observes the co-creation process (not participants as co-creators) has been little explored in marketing literature. However, knowledge about how those observers evaluate a new service disclosing co-creation with consumers has become relevant. On the other hand, consumer satisfaction with the co-created product/service is considered a success measurement of the co-creation result. Nevertheless, nothing is known about how previous satisfaction or dissatisfaction with an offer influences the evaluation of the co-created product/service. In this context, the general objective of this research is to analyze the moderating effect of previous dissatisfaction with the service category on the evaluation of a co-created service, from the observer’s consumer perspective. Through two experimental studies, we found that when there is consumer dissatisfaction with the service category, to disclose the co-creation of a new service would lead to greater purchase intention. The managerial implications include marketing communications and service decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2( 3), 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, N. & Park, S. (2001). Development of electronic commerce user‐consumer satisfaction index (ECUSI) for Internet shopping. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(8), 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, B., Evans, K. R., & Zou, S. (2008). The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2010). Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, S., Wittkowski, K., & Handrich, M. J. (2015). The dark side of customer co-creation: Exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maklan, S., Knox, S., & Ryals, L. (2008). New trends in Innovation and Customer Relationship Management: A Challenge for Market Researchers. Journal of the Market Research Society, 50(2), 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R.L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajah, E., Marshall, R., & Nam, I. (2008). Relationship glue: Customers and marketers co-creating a purchase experience. In A. Y. Lee & D. Soman (Eds.), NA – Advances in consumer research (Vol. 35, pp. 367–373). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclame, A. (2014). https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/. Access in September 2016.

  • Roggeveen, A. L., Tsiros, M., & Grewal, D. (2012). Understanding the co-creation effect: When does collaborating with customers provide a lift to service recovery? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 771. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0274-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, C. J., & Yi, Y. (2006). When brand attitudes affect the customer satisfaction-loyalty relation: The moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. V., & Malaviya, P. (2013). Consumer-generated ads: Does awareness of advertising co-creation help or hurt? Journal of Marketing, 77(May), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troye, S. V., & Supphellen, M. (2012). Consumer participation in coproduction: “I Made It Myself” effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiotsou, R. (2006). The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernette, E., & Hamdi-Kidar, L. (2013). Co-creation with Consumers : Who has the competence and wants to Cooperate ? International Journal of Market Research, 55(4), 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim, C. K., Chan, K. W., & Lam, S. S. K. (2012). Do customers and employees enjoy service participation? Synergistic effects of self- and other-efficacy. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melby Karina Zuniga Huertas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huertas, M.K.Z., Pergentino, I. (2018). The Moderator Effect of Previous Dissatisfaction with Service Category on Co-Creation with Consumers. In: Krey, N., Rossi, P. (eds) Back to the Future: Using Marketing Basics to Provide Customer Value. AMSAC 2017. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66023-3_114

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics