Skip to main content

Automation Process for Co-evolution of Enterprise Architecture Meta-Models and Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 299))

  • 2067 Accesses

Abstract

Maintaining up-to-date and accurate enterprise architecture (EA) models is a non-trivial task due to their size and complexity. This becomes more challenging when the meta-model governing these models changes. Current EA maintenance processes are executed manually with little automation, resulting in a time consuming and error prone task. This paper presents a (semi-)automated process for co-evolving EA meta-models and EA models by gathering information from both practitioners and existing literature. This work is one of the steps in the direction of minimizing manual effort for EAM by automation and eliminating modeling errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.linkconsulting.com/eams/.

References

  1. Farwick, M., Agreiter, B., Breu, R., Ryll, S., Voges, K., Hanschke, I.: Automation processes for enterprise architecture management. In: 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 340–349. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farwick, M., Agreiter, B., Breu, R., Ryll, S., Voges, K., Hanschke, I.: Requirements for automated enterprise architecture model maintenance. In: 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farwick, M., Pasquazzo, W., Breu, R., Schweda, C.M., Voges, K., Hanschke, I.: A meta-model for automated enterprise architecture model maintenance. In: 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haren, V.: TOGAF Version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CIO Council: Federal enterprise architecture framework version 2 (2013). https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/egov_docs/fea_v2.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2017

  6. Hanschke, I.: Strategic IT Management: A Toolkit for Enterprise Architecture Management. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. United States Department of Defense: The DODAF architecture framework version 2.02 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dam, H.K., Le, L.S., Ghose, A.: Supporting change propagation in the evolution of enterprise architectures. In: 14th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 24–33. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Future research topics in enterprise architecture management – a knowledge management perspective. In: Dan, A., Gittler, F., Toumani, F. (eds.) ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 6275, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16132-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, R., Aier, S., Winter, R.: A federated approach to enterprise architecture model maintenance. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. (EMISA) 2(2), 14–22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aier, S., Kurpjuweit, S., Saat, J., Winter, R.: Enterprise architecture design as an engineering discipline. AIS Trans. Enterp. Syst. 1(1), 36–43 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaisler, S.H., Armour, F., Valivullah, M.: Enterprise architecting: critical problems. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 224b–224b. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Neubert, C., Schweda, C.M.: A lightweight approach to enterprise architecture modeling and documentation. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 136–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17722-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva, N., Ferreira, F., Sousa, P., da Silva, M.M.: Automating the migration of enterprise architecture models. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. (IJISMD) 7(2), 72–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva, N., Mira da Silva, M., Sousa, P.: Modelling the evolution of enterprise architectures using ontologies. In: 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva, N., Rechau, T., da Silva, M.M., Sousa, P. (2017). Automation Process for Co-evolution of Enterprise Architecture Meta-Models and Models. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics