Skip to main content

The Neoformalist Proposal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Film/Music Analysis

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Audio-Visual Culture ((PSAVC))

  • 2115 Accesses

Abstract

Neoformalism is presented as a fitting solution to overcome a separatist conception of music and film. After a presentation of the tenets of the neoformalism approach, the focus is narrowed on how it can be applied to the analysis of music in films (by focussing on the motivations and functions that music can have as one of the interdependent filmic devices) and why its application is fruitful (it allows for a consideration of the full gamut of roles that music can have, including the more humbly formal ones that are typically eschew in other more interpretation-oriented approaches).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W., and Hanns Eisler. 2007 [1947]. Composing for the Films. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bann, Stephen, and John E. Bowlt (eds.). 1973. Russian Formalism. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt, John. 1997. A Neo-Formalist Approach to Film Aesthetics and Education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 31 (2): 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1981. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1989a. A Case for Cognitivism. Iris 9 (Spring): 11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1989b. Making Meaning. Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1990. A Case for Cognitivism: Further Reflections. Iris 11 (Summer): 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1993. Film Interpretation Revisited. Film Criticism 17 (2–3): 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1997. On the History of Film Style. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 1998. Preaching Pluralism: Pluralism, Truth, and Scholarly Inquiry in Film Studies. Cinema Journal 37 (2): 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 2008. Poetics of Cinema. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. 2011. Cognitive Theory. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, ed. Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 356–367. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. 2010. Film Art: An Introduction, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, and Nöel Carroll (eds.). 1996. Post-Theory. Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, Kristin Thompson, and Jeff Smith. 2016. Film Art: An Introduction, 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Nick. 1982. The Formalist’s Dreyer. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer by David Bordwell. Review. October 23 (Winter): 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, Noël. 1973. Theory of Film Practice, trans. Helen R. Lane. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, Cristina. 2002. La musica nel cinema. Musica, immagine, racconto. Rome: Gremese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. 1988. Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. 1996. Prospects for Film Theory: A Personal Assessment. In Post-theory. Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll, 37–68. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, Seymour. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Ian. 1998. Formalism and Neoformalism. In The Oxford Guide to Film Studies, ed. John Hill and Pamela Church Gibson, 58–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Annabel. 2000. Film Music: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology. In Music and Cinema, ed. James Buhler, Caryl Flinn, and David Neumeyer, 360–377. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Nicholas. 1998. Analysing Musical Multimedia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Mervyn (ed.). 2010. The Hollywood Film Music Reader. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copland, Aaron. 1949. Tip to Moviegoers: Take Off Those Ear-muffs. New York Times Magazine, 6: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, Victor. 1980. Russian Formalism. History—Doctrine, 4th ed. The Hague, Paris and New York: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Syd. 1998. The Screenwriter’s Problem Solver: How to Recognize, Identify, and Define Screenwriting Problems. New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gault, Berys. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, Ernst H. 1961. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbman, Claudia. 1987. Unheard Melodies. Narrative Film Music. London and Bloomington: BFI/Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Peter. 1997. Pluralism Versus the Correct Position. Cinema Journal 36 (2): 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, Lee T., and Marion J. Reis (eds.). 1965. Russian Formalism Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissa, Zofia. 1965. Ästhetik der Filmmusik. Berlin: Henschelverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, Sergio. 2009. Musica Per Film. Storia, Estetica, Analisi, Tipologie. Lucca and Milan: LIM-Ricordi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer, David. 2015. Meaning and Interpretation of Music in Cinema. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl, and Greg M. Smith (eds.). 1999. Passionate Views. Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, Roy M. 1977. Film Music: A Neglected Art: A Critical Study of Music in Films. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quart, Alissa. 2000. David Bordwell Blows the Whistle on Film Studies. Lingua Franca 10 (March): 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, Richard, and Gary Bettison. 2010. What Is Film Theory? An Introduction to Contemporary Debates. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoff, Ronald. 2012. An Eclectic Methodology for Analyzing Film Music. Music and the Moving Image 5 (2): 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvalaggio, Jerry L. 1981. The Emergence of a New School of Criticism: Neo-Formalism. Journal of the University Film Association 33 (4): 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovsky, Victor. 1973 [1914]. The Resurrection of the Word. In Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation, trans. and ed. Stephen Bann and John E. Bowlt, 41–47. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jeff. 1996. Unheard Melodies? A Critique of Psychoanalytic Theories of Film Music. In Post-theory. Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Nöel Carroll, 230–247. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jeff. 1999. Movie Music as Moving Music: Emotion, Cognition, and the Film Score. In Passionate Views. Film, Cognition, and Emotion, ed. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith, 146–167. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spottiswoode, Raymond. 1962 [1935]. A Grammar of the Film: An Analysis of Film Technique. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. 2000. Film Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Tony. 1991. Film Score: The Art and Craft of Movie Music. Burbank, CA: Riverwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin, and David Bordwell. 1976. Space and Narrative in the Films of Ozu. Screen 17 (2): 41–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin. 1981. Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible: A Neoformalist Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin. 1988a. Breaking the Glass Armor. Neoformalist Film Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin. 1988b. Godard’s Unknown Country: Sauve qui peut (la vie). In Breaking the Glass Armor. Neoformalist Film Analysis, 263–288. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin. 1988c. Sawing through the Bough: Tout va bien as a Brechtian Film. In Breaking the Glass Armor. Neoformalist Film Analysis, 110–131. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson-Jones, Katherine. 2011. Formalism. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, ed. Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 131–141. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Audissino .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Audissino, E. (2017). The Neoformalist Proposal. In: Film/Music Analysis. Palgrave Studies in Audio-Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61693-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics