Abstract
We can identify two approaches for realizing synergies between multi-agent systems and distributed simulation. The first one is to incorporate agents into a simulation environment, specifically into an HLA federation, using interoperability techniques. The second is to build an agent environment based on HLA so that the RTI is employed to serve as the medium for agent communication and management. For preliminaries, we briefly introduce agent-based simulation and describe a cognitive agent architecture as an example agent architecture. Then, we discuss these two integration approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson, J., & Löf, S. (1999). HLA as conceptual basis for a multi-agent environment. Orlando: s.n.
Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason. s.l.: Harvard University Press.
Braubach, L., & Pokahr, A. (2009). Using rule-based concepts as foundation for higher-level agent architectures. In: Handbook of research on emerging rule-based languages and technologies: Open solutions and approaches (pp. 493–524). s.l.: s.n.
CogAgentLib. (2017). CogAgentLib. https://sites.google.com/site/okantopcu/coagent. Accessed April 22, 2017.
DeCoAgent. (2015). DeCoAgent framework web site. https://sites.google.com/site/okantopcu/decoagent. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.
Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994). KQML as an agent communication language (pp. 456–463). Gaithersburg: ACM.
FIPA-SC00008I. (2002). FIPA SL content language specification. Geneva, Switzerland: Foundation for intelligent physical agents.
FIPA-SC00061G (2012). FIPA ACL message structure specification, Geneva, Switzerland: FIPA.
Göktürk, E., & Polat, F. (2003). Implementing agent communication for a multi-agent simulation infrastructure on HLA (pp. 619–626). Paris: Springer.
Haykin, S. (2009). Neural networks and learning machines. New Jersey: Pearson.
Macal, C., & North, M. (2010). Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4, 151–162.
McClelland, J. L. (2014). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises (2nd ed.) Stanford.
Millgram, E., & Thagard, P. (1996). Deliberative coherence. Synthese, 108(1), 63–88.
OMG. (2012). OMG systems modeling language (SysML) Version 1.3. s.l.: OMG.
Poslad, S. (2007). Specifying protocols for multi-agent systems interaction. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 2(4), 15:1–15:24.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence a modern approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River (New Jersey): Prentice Hall.
Shiffman, D. (2012). The nature of code. s.l.: s.n.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(3), 435–502.
Thagard, P., & Millgram, E. (1995). Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. In A. Ram & D. B. Leake (Eds.), Goal-driven learning (pp. 439–454). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Thagard, P., & Verbeurgt, K. (1998). Coherence as constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 22(1), 1–24.
Topçu, O. (2014). Adaptive decision making in agent-based simulation. Journal of Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 90(7), 815–832.
Zhuang, Y., Zhang, Z., Cheng, J., & Du, H. (2006). Research on multi-agent simulation environment based on HLA (pp. 154–159). Dalian: IEEE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Topçu, O., Oğuztüzün, H. (2017). Integration of Agents into HLA. In: Guide to Distributed Simulation with HLA. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61267-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61267-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61266-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61267-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)