Skip to main content
  • 1365 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter builds on the concepts related to project design (Chap. 4) and descriptive (Chap. 5) to present a number of possible inferential statistics approaches suitable for the PIO MM (this chapter) to better understand the practical and statistical significance of the data. Interpretation of the analysis is discussed for each of the inferential methods. Selecting appropriate inferential statistics depends on your project study design, the variables representing the PIO MM concepts, and the measures used to operationalize them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gay JM. Clinical epidemiology & evidence-based medicine glossary: experimental design and statistics terminology. Washington State University [Internet], 2010. [cited 2017 May 12] Available from: http://people.vetmed.wsu.edu/jmgay/courses/GlossExpDesign.htm

  2. Dunn OJ, Clark VA (2009) Basic statistics: a primer for the biomedical sciences. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engineering statistics handbook, do the observations come from a particular distribution? [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section2/prc213.htm

  5. American Psychological Association (APA) (2009) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Monsen KA, Brandt JK, Brueshoff B, Chi CL, Mathiason MA, Swenson SM, Thorson DR (2017) Social determinants and health disparities associated with outcomes of women of childbearing age who receive public health nurse home visiting services. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 46(2):292–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Camp RC, Tweet AG (1994) Benchmarking applied to health care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 20(5):229–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Monsen KA, Radosevich DM, Johnson SC, Farri O, Kerr MJ, Geppert JS (2012) Benchmark attainment by maternal and child health clients across public health nursing agencies. Public Health Nurs 29(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatfield C (1995) Problem solving: a statistician’s guide. Chapman & Hall/CRC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Too big to fail: large samples and the P-value problem [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www.galitshmueli.com/system/files/Largesample-12-6-2012.pdf 2012

  11. Page P (2014) Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther 9(5):726

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenwald AG, Gonzalez R, Harris RJ, Guthrie D (1996) Effect sizes and p-values: what should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology 3(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kotrlik JW, Williams HA (2003) The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Inf Technol Learn Perform 21(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson KE, McMorris BJ, Raynor LA, Monsen KA (2013) What big size you have. Using effect sizes to determine the impact of public health nursing inter-ventions. Appl Clin Inform 4:434–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Monsen KA, Farri O, McNaughton DB, Savik K (2011) Problem stabilization: a metric for problem improvement in home visiting clients. Appl Clin Inform 2:437–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freedman DA (2012) Survival analysis. Am Stat:110–119

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The science of improvement: how to improve [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/pages/howtoimprove/scienceofimprovementhowtoimprove.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monsen, K.A. (2018). Inferential Analysis and Interpretation. In: Intervention Effectiveness Research: Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61246-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61246-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61245-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61246-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics