Abstract
Nowadays, dental composite is the material of choice for direct restorations in anterior and posterior teeth. Since their commercialization in the 1960’s the development of dental composites has been an ongoing effort with key compositional changes related to fillers and resins but also curing characteristics. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the development of dental composites for direct restorations. Roughly three major periods can be distinguished in the timeframe of their development so far: (1) mid 1960’s – late 1970’s with major changes in the curing characteristics (from self- and UV-cured to visible light-cured composites); (2) late 1970’ – mid 2000’s with various filler modifications (from macro- and micro-filled to hybrid and nano-filled) and (3) mid 2000’s – mid 2010’s with important resin modifications (from methacrylates to high molecular weight modified methacrylates, siloranes and self-adhesive composites).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate.
- 2.
Urethane dimethacrylate.
- 3.
Ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate.
References
WHO. Future use of materials for dental restoration: report of the meeting convened at WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland, 16–17 Nov 2009. 2010.
Bowen RL. Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of Bis-phenol and glycidyl acrylate. US Patents No. 3066112. 1962.
Bowen RL. Method of preparing a monomer having phenoxy and methacrylate groups linked by hydroxy glyceryl groups. United States Patents No. 3179623. 1965.
Bowen RL. Silica-resin direct filling material and method of preparation. United States Patents No. 3194783 and No. 3194784. 1965.
Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:97–116.
Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:480–8.
Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6:302–18.
Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: three-year report. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30:891–7.
Osborne JW, Gale EN, Ferguson GW. One-yer and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgam. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30:795–800.
Santini A, Gallegos IT, Felix CM. Photoinitiators in dentistry: a review. Prim Dent J. 2013;2:30–3.
Dennison JB, Fan PL, Powers JM. Surface roughness of microfilled composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;102:859–62.
Powers JM, Fan PL, Raptis CN. Color stability of new composite restorative materials under accelerated aging. J Dent Res. 1980;59:2071–4.
Raptis CN, Fan PL, Powers JM. Properties of microfilled and visible light-cured composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;99:631–3.
Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38.
Young A, von der Fehr FR, Sonju T, Nordbo H. Fluoride release and uptake in vitro from a composite resin and two orthodontic adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54:223–8.
Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:516–21.
Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:e1–10.
Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:234–49.
Jin J, Takahashi R, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing. Am J Dent. 2014;27:149–54.
Melander J, Dunn WP, Link MP, Wang Y, Xu C, Walker MP. Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites. Gen Dent. 2011;59:342–7. quiz 8-9
Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13:427–38.
Takahashi H, Finger WJ, Endo T, Kanehira M, Koottathape N, Komatsu M, et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am J Dent. 2011;24:264–70.
Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi E. Physical properties of current dental nanohybrid and nanofill light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater. 2011;27:598–607.
Finer Y, Santerre JP. The influence of resin chemistry on a dental composite's biodegradation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69:233–46.
Chen M-H. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res. 2010;89:549–60.
Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for double ring-opening polymerization. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1408–12.
Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90:402–16.
Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:68–74.
Van Ende A, Mine A, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities. J Dent. 2012;40:295–303.
Aleixo AR, Guiraldo RD, Fugolin AP, Berger SB, Consani RL, Correr AB, et al. Evaluation of contraction stress, conversion degree, and cross-link density in low-shrinkage composites. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32:267–73.
Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low-shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:149–55.
Marchesi G, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Di Lenarda R, Ferracane J, Cadenaro M. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems. Dent Mater. 2010;26:947–53.
Baracco B, Perdigao J, Cabrera E, Ceballos L. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 2013;38:591–600.
Walter R, Boushell LW, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26:179–90.
Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of different fissure sealant materials and Flowable composites used as pit-and-fissure sealants: a 24-month clinical trial. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:468–73.
Pinna R, Bortone A, Sotgiu G, Dore S, Usai P, Milia E. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of one self-adhesive composite in dental hypersensitivity. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1663–72.
Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2013;29:221–30.
Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2016;32:998–1006.
Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013;38:618–25.
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:993–1000.
Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Van Meerbeek B. Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1201–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miletic, V. (2018). Development of Dental Composites. In: Miletic, V. (eds) Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60961-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60961-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60960-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60961-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)