Abstract
In this chapter I argue that any serious ambition toward ‘ecologizing’ the craft of planning would in addition to a reconfiguration of its underpinning sensibility also demand the development of a new methodological toolbox since currently existing frameworks are seriously limited by their foundations in modernist epistemologies and ontologies. I particularly focus on analyzing Ecosystem Services approaches, a set of methods that is today considered to be at the forefront of ecological planning, and carefully scrutinize how they in practice enact (or not) issues of wicked ecological complexity. I conclude that such approaches fail to provide handles for grappling with the type of complex trans-scalar ecological interdependencies that planning processes unavoidable must tackle if they are to function as vehicles for confronting planetary ecological challenges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Balducci, A., L. Boelens, J. Hillier, T. Nyseth, and C. Wilkinson. 2011. Introduction: Strategic Spatial Planning in Uncertainty: Theory and Exploratory Practice. Town Planning Review 82 (5): 481–501.
Barnosky, A.D., N. Matzke, S. Tomiya, G.O. Wogan, B. Swartz, T.B. Quental, C. Marshall, et al. 2011. Has the Earth/’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived? Nature 471 (7336): 51–57.
Braun, B. 2015. THE 2013 ANTIPODE RGS-IBG LECTURE New Materialisms and Neoliberal Natures. Antipode 47 (1): 1–14.
Callon, M., and J. Law. 2005. On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–733.
Castree, N. 2003. Commodifying What Nature? Progress in Human Geography 27 (3): 273–297.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ernstson, H., and S. Sörlin. 2013. Ecosystem Services as Technology of Globalization: On Articulating Values in Urban Nature. Ecological Economics 86: 274–284.
Guattari, F. 2000. The Three Ecologies. London: Athlone Press.
Hahn, T., C. McDermott, C. Ituarte-Lima, M. Schultz, T. Green, and M. Tuvendal. 2015. Purposes and Degrees of Commodification: Economic Instruments for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Need Not Rely on Markets or Monetary Valuation. Ecosystem Services 16: 74–82.
Hinchliffe, S., M.B. Kearnes, M. Degen, and S. Whatmore. 2007. Ecologies and Economies of Action—Sustainability, Calculations, and Other Things. Environment and Planning A 39 (2): 260–282.
Jackson, S., and L.R. Palmer. 2015. Reconceptualizing Ecosystem Services Possibilities for Cultivating and Valuing the Ethics and Practices of Care. Progress in Human Geography 39 (2): 122–145.
Kosoy, N., and E. Corbera. 2010. Payments for Ecosystem Services as Commodity Fetishism. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1228–1236.
Kwa, C. 2002. Romantic and Baroque Conceptions of Complex Wholes in the Sciences. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, ed. J. Law and A. Mol. Durham, NC: Duke University.
Latour, B. 1993. We have Never been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1998. To Modernize or to Ecologize? That’s the Question. In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium, ed. N. Castree and B. Willems-Braun, 221–242. London: Routledge.
———. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2016. Why Gaia is not a God of Totality. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276416652700.
Law, J. 2004. And if the Global were Small and Noncoherent? Method, Complexity, and the Baroque. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (1): 13–26.
Lempert, R.J., S.W. Popper, and S.C. Bankes. 2003. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Strategy Analysis (MR-1626-RPC). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Pardee Center.
McHarg, I.L. 1969. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press for the American Museum of Natural History.
McKenzie, E., S. Posner, P. Tillmann, J.R. Bernhardt, K. Howard, and A. Rosenthal. 2014. Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (2): 320–340.
Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: SAGE.
Ndubisi, F. 2002. Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Norgaard, R.B. 2010. Ecosystem Services: From Eye-Opening Metaphor to Complexity Blinder. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1219–1227.
Paul, A., P.F. Downton, E. Okoli, J.K. Gupta, and M. Tirpak. 2014. Does Adding More Lettuce Make a Hamburger Truly Green? A Metaphor Behind the Green Movement Paradigm in Designing Cities. Environment Systems and Decisions 34 (3): 373–377.
Pickering, A. (2007). Producing Another World. Paper presented at the ‘Assembling Culture’ Workshop, University of Melbourne, Australia, December 10–11.
Prigogine, I., and I. Stengers. 1997. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. New York: The Free Press.
Robertson, M.M. 2004. The Neoliberalization of Ecosystem Services: Wetland Mitigation Banking and Problems in Environmental Governance. Geoforum 35 (3): 361–373.
Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, et al. 2009. A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461 (7263): 472–475.
Secretariat of the CBD. 2012. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Serres, M. (2006). Revisiting the Natural Contract. Talk given at the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University on May 4, 2006. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/humanities-institute-old/pdf/Naturalcontract.pdf
SLL. 2013. Ekosystemtjänster i Stockholmsregionen: ett underlag för diskussion och planering. Stockholm: Stockholms Läns Landsting, förvaltningen för Tillväxt, miljö, regionplanering.
Stengers, I. 2011. Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.
Uexküll, J.V. 2010. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. 1st University of Minnesota Press ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Vatn, A. 2010. An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1245–1252.
Verran, H. 2013. Numbers Performing Nature in Quantitative Valuing. NatureCultures 2: 23–37.
Whitehead, A.N. 1929. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Metzger, J. (2018). Can the Craft of Planning Be Ecologized? (And Why the Answer to That Question Doesn’t Include ‘Ecosystem Services’). In: Kurath, M., Marskamp, M., Paulos, J., Ruegg, J. (eds) Relational Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60462-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)