Skip to main content

Can the Craft of Planning Be Ecologized? (And Why the Answer to That Question Doesn’t Include ‘Ecosystem Services’)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter I argue that any serious ambition toward ‘ecologizing’ the craft of planning would in addition to a reconfiguration of its underpinning sensibility also demand the development of a new methodological toolbox since currently existing frameworks are seriously limited by their foundations in modernist epistemologies and ontologies. I particularly focus on analyzing Ecosystem Services approaches, a set of methods that is today considered to be at the forefront of ecological planning, and carefully scrutinize how they in practice enact (or not) issues of wicked ecological complexity. I conclude that such approaches fail to provide handles for grappling with the type of complex trans-scalar ecological interdependencies that planning processes unavoidable must tackle if they are to function as vehicles for confronting planetary ecological challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balducci, A., L. Boelens, J. Hillier, T. Nyseth, and C. Wilkinson. 2011. Introduction: Strategic Spatial Planning in Uncertainty: Theory and Exploratory Practice. Town Planning Review 82 (5): 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky, A.D., N. Matzke, S. Tomiya, G.O. Wogan, B. Swartz, T.B. Quental, C. Marshall, et al. 2011. Has the Earth/’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived? Nature 471 (7336): 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B. 2015. THE 2013 ANTIPODE RGS-IBG LECTURE New Materialisms and Neoliberal Natures. Antipode 47 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., and J. Law. 2005. On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. 2003. Commodifying What Nature? Progress in Human Geography 27 (3): 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H., and S. Sörlin. 2013. Ecosystem Services as Technology of Globalization: On Articulating Values in Urban Nature. Ecological Economics 86: 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. 2000. The Three Ecologies. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., C. McDermott, C. Ituarte-Lima, M. Schultz, T. Green, and M. Tuvendal. 2015. Purposes and Degrees of Commodification: Economic Instruments for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Need Not Rely on Markets or Monetary Valuation. Ecosystem Services 16: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S., M.B. Kearnes, M. Degen, and S. Whatmore. 2007. Ecologies and Economies of Action—Sustainability, Calculations, and Other Things. Environment and Planning A 39 (2): 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., and L.R. Palmer. 2015. Reconceptualizing Ecosystem Services Possibilities for Cultivating and Valuing the Ethics and Practices of Care. Progress in Human Geography 39 (2): 122–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosoy, N., and E. Corbera. 2010. Payments for Ecosystem Services as Commodity Fetishism. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1228–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwa, C. 2002. Romantic and Baroque Conceptions of Complex Wholes in the Sciences. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, ed. J. Law and A. Mol. Durham, NC: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993. We have Never been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. To Modernize or to Ecologize? That’s the Question. In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium, ed. N. Castree and B. Willems-Braun, 221–242. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Why Gaia is not a God of Totality. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276416652700.

  • Law, J. 2004. And if the Global were Small and Noncoherent? Method, Complexity, and the Baroque. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R.J., S.W. Popper, and S.C. Bankes. 2003. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Strategy Analysis (MR-1626-RPC). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Pardee Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I.L. 1969. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press for the American Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E., S. Posner, P. Tillmann, J.R. Bernhardt, K. Howard, and A. Rosenthal. 2014. Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (2): 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndubisi, F. 2002. Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R.B. 2010. Ecosystem Services: From Eye-Opening Metaphor to Complexity Blinder. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1219–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A., P.F. Downton, E. Okoli, J.K. Gupta, and M. Tirpak. 2014. Does Adding More Lettuce Make a Hamburger Truly Green? A Metaphor Behind the Green Movement Paradigm in Designing Cities. Environment Systems and Decisions 34 (3): 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (2007). Producing Another World. Paper presented at the ‘Assembling Culture’ Workshop, University of Melbourne, Australia, December 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., and I. Stengers. 1997. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M.M. 2004. The Neoliberalization of Ecosystem Services: Wetland Mitigation Banking and Problems in Environmental Governance. Geoforum 35 (3): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, et al. 2009. A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461 (7263): 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the CBD. 2012. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2006). Revisiting the Natural Contract. Talk given at the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University on May 4, 2006. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/humanities-institute-old/pdf/Naturalcontract.pdf

  • SLL. 2013. Ekosystemtjänster i Stockholmsregionen: ett underlag för diskussion och planering. Stockholm: Stockholms Läns Landsting, förvaltningen för Tillväxt, miljö, regionplanering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. 2011. Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J.V. 2010. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. 1st University of Minnesota Press ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. 2010. An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1245–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verran, H. 2013. Numbers Performing Nature in Quantitative Valuing. NatureCultures 2: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. 1929. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metzger, J. (2018). Can the Craft of Planning Be Ecologized? (And Why the Answer to That Question Doesn’t Include ‘Ecosystem Services’). In: Kurath, M., Marskamp, M., Paulos, J., Ruegg, J. (eds) Relational Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60462-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics