Abstract
The historical context and terminology used to fit unusual reproduction via surrogate motherhood into traditional models of the family are introduced in this chapter. Conflicting definitions are highlighted and attempts to minimise difference in favour of poorly working realities are shown not to be beneficial in the long term. Family differences have a legitimate place in society as evidenced by innovative fertility treatment options and solo, same-sex and older peoples’ lifestyle choices. The different types of surrogacy, reasons for using surrogacy and the major issues for those involved are discussed. Inequalities, human rights, exploitation and the commodification of children are also shown to exist. Although most of the research is concerned with psychosocial issues, this chapter also draws on research from related disciplines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addelson, K. (1990). Some moral issues in public problems of reproduction. Social Problems, 37, 1–17.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2008). Surrogate motherhood. ACOG committee opinion no. 397. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 465–470.
Appleton, T. (2001). Surrogacy. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 11, 256–257.
ASRM. (2013). Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Consideration of the gestational carrier: A committee opinion. Fertility & Sterility, 99, 1838–1841.
ASRM. https://www.asrm.org/Templates/SearchResults.aspx?q=surrogacy&p=1. Accessed 18 Jan 2016.
Bartholet, E. (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the politics of parenting. New York: Houghton.
Bartholet, E., Draper, E., Resnic, J., & Geller, G. (1994). Rethinking the choice to have children. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(8), 1058–1073.
Batson, C. (2014). Altruism or egoism. In The altruism question toward a social-psychological answer (pp. 6–7). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Beeson, D., Darnovsky, M., & Lippman, A. (2014). What’s in a name? Variations in terminology of third party reproduction. Paper presented at the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy, The Hague: ISS (11–13 August) cited in: Cheney, K. (2016). Preventing exploitation, promoting equity: Findings from the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy 2014. Adoption & Fostering, 40(1), 6–19.
Bello, F., Akinajo, O., & Olayemi, O. (2014). In-vitro fertilization, gamete donation and surrogacy: Perceptions of women attending an infertility clinic in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 18(2), 127–133.
Bernardes, J. (1993). Responsibilities in studying post-modern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 35–49.
Blackburn-Starza, A. (2016a, September 14). High court refuses single father’s application for a parental order. Bionews, p. 819.
Blackburn-Starza, A. (2016b, May 23). Single father wins surrogacy human rights ruling. Bionews, p. 852.
Blyth, E. (1994). “I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say ‘I’ve done something with my life’”: Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 12, 189–198.
Blyth, E. (1995). “Not a primrose path”: Commissioning parents’ experiences of surrogacy arrangements in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 185–196.
Braverman, A., & Corson, S. (2002). A comparison of oocyte donors’ and gestational carriers/surrogates’ attitudes towards third party reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19(10), 462–469.
Brazier, M., Campbell, A., & Golombok, S. (1998). Surrogacy review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulation. Report of the review team. Cm 4068. London: Department of Health.
Brinsden, P. (2003). Gestational surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), 483–491.
British Medical Association. (1990). Surrogacy: Ethical considerations. Report of the working party on human infertility services. London: BMA Publications.
British Medical Association. (1996). Changing conceptions of motherhood. The practice of surrogacy in Britain. London: BMA Publications.
Burrell, C., & Edozien, L. (2014). Surrogacy in modern obstetric practice. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 19, 272–278.
Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cassidy, T., & Sintrovani, P. (2008). Motives for parenthood, psychosocial factors and health in women undergoing IVF. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 4–17.
Celebrities. (2016). http://www.therichest.com/expensive-lifestyle/lifestyle/18-celebrities-who-used-surrogacy/. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
Cherry, M., & Peppin, J. (2005). Part I: North America, United States perspective on assisted reproductive technologies. In Annals of bioethics: Regional perspectives in bioethics (p. 34). Lisse: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Ciccarelli, J. C. (1997). The surrogate mother: A post birth follow up study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles: California School of Professional Psychology.
Ciccarelli, J. C., & Beckman, L. J. (2005). Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. Journal of Social Sciences, 61(1), 21–43.
Cotton, K. (1985). Baby Cotton: For love or money. London: Dorling Kindersley.
Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2013). The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – Implications for national and international policy and practice. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2, 1–11.
Darnovsky, M., & Beeson, D. (2014). Global surrogacy practices. ISS working paper series. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University, p. 54. Hdl.handle.net/1765/77402
Dhont, N., Luchters, S., & Ombelet, W. (2010). Gender differences and factors associated with treatment-seeking behaviour for infertility in Rwanda. Human Reproduction, 25, 2024–2030.
Dhont, N., van de Wijgert, J., Coene, G., Gasarabwe, A., & Temmerman, M. (2011). ‘Mama and papa nothing’: Living with infertility among an urban population in Kigali, Rwanda. Human Reproduction, 26(3), 623–629.
Dimka, R. A., & Dein, S. L. (2013). The work of a woman is to give birth to children: Cultural constructions of infertility in nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 17(2), 102–117.
Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Mokoena, N. E., & Van der Spuy, Z. M. (2004). ‘You are a man because you have children’: Experiences, reproductive health knowledge and treatment-seeking behaviour among men suffering from couple infertility in South Africa. Human Reproduction, 19(4), 960–967.
Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Mokoena, N. E., Lombard, C. J., & van der Spuy, Z. M. (2005). Psychological distress among women suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: A quantitative assessment. Human Reproduction, 20(7), 1938–1943.
Dyer, S., Mokoena, N., Maritz, J., & van der Spuy, Z. (2008). Motives for parenthood among couples attending a level 3 infertility clinic in the public health sector in South Africa. Human Reproduction, 23(2), 352–357.
Gaither. (2015). Using a surrogate mother: What you need to know. WebMD. Retrieved April 6, 2014.
Golombok, S. (1992). Psychological functioning in infertility patients. Human Reproduction, 7(2), 208–217.
Hanafin, H. (1984). The surrogate mother: An exploratory study. Ph.D. Dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles, CA. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(10-B), 3335–3336.
Hanafin, H. (1999). Surrogacy and gestational carrier participants. In L. Hammer-Burns & S. C. Covington (Eds.), Infertility counselling (pp. 375–0388). Pearl River: Parthenon.
Harrison, M. (1990). Psychological ramifications of surrogate motherhood. In N. L. Stotland (Ed.), Psychiatric aspects if reproductive technology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Heinicke, C. M. (1995). Determinants of the transition to parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Status and social conditions of parenting (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henaghan, M. (2013). International surrogacy trends: How family law is coping. Australian Journal of Adoption, 7(3), 1–24.
HFEA. (2008). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. Legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents. Accessed 25 May 2016.
HFEA. (2009). S1, 1.3. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/268039/surrogacy.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.
HFEA. (2013). Code of practice (8th ed.). London: HFEA.
HFEA. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-options-surrogacy.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2016.
Hohman, H. H., & Hagan, C. B. (2001). Satisfaction with surrogate mothering: A relational model. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 4, 61–84.
Hornsey, K., Smith, N., Norcross, S., Ghevaert, L., & Jones, S. (2015). Surrogacy in the UK: ‘Myth busting and reform’. Report of the Surrogacy UK Working Group on Surrogacy Law Reform, Surrogacy UK, November 2015.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. (1990). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. (2016). Egg and sperm donation in the UK: 2012–2013. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Egg_and_sperm_donation_in_the_UK_2012-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2016.
Humphrey, M. (1977). Sex differences in attitude to parenthood. Human Relations, 30, 737–749.
Inhorn, M. (2003). Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: Illustrations from Egypt. Social Science & Medicine, 56(9), 1837–1851.
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics & FIGO. (2008). Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Surrogacy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 102, 312–313.
Jaggar, A. M. (1994). Living with contradictions: Controversies in feminist social values. Boulder: Westview.
Kleinpeter, C. B. (2002). Surrogacy: The parents’ story. Psychological Reports, 91, 135–145.
Krishnan, V. (1994). Attitudes toward surrogate motherhood in Canada. Health Care for Women International, 15(4), 357.
Langridge, D., Connolly, K. J., & Sheeran, P. (2000). Reasons for wanting a child. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(4), 321–338.
Lasker, J. N., & Borg, S. (1987). In search of parenthood: Coping with infertility and high-tech conception (pp. 11–11). Boston: Beacon.
Levine, N. (2008). Alternative kinship, marriage and reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 375–389.
Marteau, T. (1989). The psychological costs of screening. British Medical Journal, 299(6698), 527.
Matetakufa, S. N. (1998). Our own gift. New Internationalist Magazine, 303, 11.
Miall, C. (1989). Reproductive technology versus the stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Care Work, 70(1), 43–50.
Millbank, J., Stuhmcke, A., & Karpin, L. (2016). Embryo donation and understanding of kinship: The impact of law and policy. Human Reproduction. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew297.
Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G., & Devroey, P. (2008). Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Human Reproduction Update, 14(6), 605–621.
OTA. (1988). Office of Technology Assessment. Infertility: Medical and social choices. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Pannor, R., & Baran, A. (1984). Open adoption as standard practice. Child Welfare, 63, 245–250.
Petitfils, C., Sastre, M., Sorum, C. P., & Mullet, E. (2017). Mapping people’s views regarding the acceptability of surrogate motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(1), 65–76.
Poote, A., & Van den Akker, O. (2009). British women’s attitudes to surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 24(1), 139–145.
Postgate, J. N. (1992). Early Mesopotamia society and economy at the dawn of history (p. 105). Routledge. isbn:0-415-11032-7.
Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2007). The sociocultural and biological meaning of parenthood. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(3), 79–86.
Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception in the heart. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schenker, J. (1997). Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 71, 113–121.
Schmulker, I., & Algen, B. (1989). The terror of surrogate motherhood: Fantasies, realities and viable legislation. In J. Offerman-Zuckerberg (Ed.), Gender in transition: A new frontier. New York: Plenum.
Sharma, B. (2006). Forensic considerations of surrogacy – An overview. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 80–85.
Shenfield, F., Pennings, G., Cohen, J., Devroey, P., de Wert, G., & Tarlatzis, B. (2005). ESHRE task force on ethics and law 10: Surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 20(10), 2705–2707.
Soundby, J. (1997). Infertility in the Gambia: Traditional and modern health care. Patient Education and Counselling, 31(1), 29–37.
Stiffler, L. H. (1991). Adoption’s impact on birthmothers: “Can a mother forget her child?”. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 10, 249–259.
Strathern, M. (2002). Still giving nature a helping hand? Surrogacy: A debate about technology and society. Journal of Molecular Biology, 319, 985–999.
Surrogacy Arrangements Act. (1985). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Tangri, S., & Kahn, J. (1993). Ethical issues in the new reproductive technologies: Perspectives from feminism and the psychology profession. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 271–280.
Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thorpe, K., Dragonas, T., & Golding, J. (1992). The effects of psychosocial factors on the mother’s emotional well-being during early parenthood: A cross-cultural study of Britain and Greece. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 10(4), 205–217.
Utian, W., Sgheenan, L., Goldfarb, J., & Kiwi, R. (1985). Successful pregnancy after in-vitro-fertilization-embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1351–1352.
van Balen, F., & Trimbos-Kemper, T. C. (1995). Involuntarily childless couples: Their desire to have children and their motives. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16(3), 137–144.
van den Akker, O. B. A. (1998). Functions and responsibilities of organizations dealing with surrogate motherhood in the UK. Human Fertility, 1, 10–13.
van den Akker, O. B. A. (1999). Organizational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in the UK. Human Reproduction, 14(1), 101–105.
van den Akker, O. (2000). The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Human Reproduction, 15(8), 1849–1855.
van den Akker, O. (2001). The acceptable face of parenthood: The relative status of biological and cultural interpretations of offspring in infertility treatment. Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 3, 137–153.
van den Akker, O. (2002). The complete guide to infertility. Diagnosis, treatment, options. London: Free Association Press.
van den Akker, O. B. A. (2003). Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers’ experience of surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.
van den Akker, O. B. A. (2005). A longitudinal pre pregnancy to post-delivery comparison of genetic and gestational surrogate and intended mothers: Confidence and genealogy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26(4), 277–284.
van den Akker, O. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update, 13(1), 53–62.
van den Akker, O. (2012). Reproductive health psychology (pp. 162–165). Chichester: Wiley.
van den Akker, O. B. A. (2016). Reproductive health matters. The Psychologist, 29(1), 2–4.
van den Akker, O. B. A., Camara, I., & Hunt, B. (2016a). Together … for only a moment’ British media construction of altruistic non-commercial surrogate motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(3), 271–281.
van den Akker, O. B. A., Fronek, P., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2016b). ‘This neo-natal ménage à trois’ British media framing of transnational surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(1), 15–27.
Waddoups, S. (1991). Resistance to open adoption. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Social Work, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Waddoups, J. (1994). Open adoption, human capital formation, and uncertainty. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15(1), 5–21.
Warnock, M. (1984). A question of life: The Warnock report on human fertility and embryology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Women & Health, Health Information and More. (2016). http://www.womens-health.co.uk/surrogacy-the-commissioning-parents.html. Accessed 23 May 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van den Akker, O.B.A. (2017). Introduction to Surrogacy: Historical and Present Day Context. In: Surrogate Motherhood Families. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60453-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60453-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60452-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60453-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)