Skip to main content

A Comparison of Auditory and Visual in-Vehicle Stop Signals in Philippine Public Road-Based Transportation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2017)

Abstract

Public road-based transportation vehicles (PRTV’s), mainly jeepneys and buses, are popular modes of transportation in the Philippines. While some jeepneys today have added mechanisms, such as switch-controlled buzzers, for passengers to indicate their stop, the most prevalent method remains to be the system of calling out to the driver. This study aims to compare which type of signal (auditory, visual, audiovisual, voice) will be the most effective in catching a PRTV driver’s attention. Simulating a driver’s environment, participants were tasked to respond whenever they were presented with a signal. Response times were gathered and analyzed using Analysis of Variance. It was determined that there was a significant difference among the different types of signals. Further comparison tests showed that the Light+Buzzer (audiovisual) signal elicited the fastest reaction time while the voice signal caused the slowest reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dabu, F.: Motor Vehicles and Filipino Jeepney Drivers in Metro Manila. Retrieved on November 25, 2016 from http://www.up.edu.ph/motor-vehicles-and-filipino-jeepney-drivers-in-metro-manila/ (2015)

  2. Castro, C.: Visual demands in driving. In: Castro, C. (ed.) Human Factors and Visual Cognitive Performance in Driving, pp. 1–29. CRC Press, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Regan, M.A., Salmon, P.M., Young, K.L.: Distraction and public transport: case study of bus driver distraction. In: Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A., Young, K.L. (eds.) Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation, pp. 229–245. CRC Press, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ho, C., Spence, C.: Crossmodal information processing in driving. In: Castro, C. (ed.) Human factor of Visual and Cognitive Performance in Driving, pp. 187–200. CRC Press, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Basics of Sound [PDF]. (2016). NoiseQuest

    Google Scholar 

  6. Auditory, Tactile and Olfactory Displays [PDF]: University of the Philippines Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Department (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edworthy, J.: Urgency mapping in auditory warning signals. In: Stanton, N. (ed.) Human Factors in Alarm Design, pp. 15–30. Taylor & Francis, London (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nees, M.A., Walker, B.N.: Auditory displays for in-vehicle technologies. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 7(1), 58–99 (2011). doi:10.1177/1557234X11410396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Royce, P.R.: Light. In: Royce, P.R. (ed.) Lighting for Driving: Roads, Vehicles, Signs, and Signals, pp. 19–43. CRC Press, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bierman, A., Boyce, R., Bullough, J., Conway, M., Huang, K.: Luminous Intensity for Traffic Signals: A Scientific Basis for Performance Specifications, pp. 3–44. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, G.P., Shelton, J.: Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Sci. Res. 1, 30–32 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engstrom, J., Harbluk, J.L., Victor, T.W.: Distraction assessment methods based on visual behavior and event detection. In: Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A., Young, K.L. (eds.) Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation, pp. 135–165. CRC Press, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hayami, T., Kemori, S., Morikawa, M., Murata, A.: Basic study on automotive warning presentation to front/rear hazard by vibrotactile stimulation. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Safety, pp. 519–529. CRC Press, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josiel Catherine V. Almeda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Almeda, J.C.V., Domingo, M.C.J., Saringan, A.B.L. (2018). A Comparison of Auditory and Visual in-Vehicle Stop Signals in Philippine Public Road-Based Transportation. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_97

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_97

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics