Skip to main content

Development of a Computational Model to Aid Prediction of Neurosurgical Brain Shift

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Bioengineering ((LNBE))

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

Stereotactic procedures are an increasingly common tool for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders. Common surgeries reliant on a stereotactic reference frame include Deep Brain Stimulation, Stereoelectroencephalography, Stereobiopsy, and high precision intraparenchymal drug delivery. Introduction: Stereotactic neurosurgical procedures are planned and carried out per preoperative medical images in a fixed reference frame. Loss of cerebrospinal fluid and a variety of other factors lead to a displacement of the anatomical target from the stereotactic coordinates, known as brain shift. Aims: To develop a computational model to aid in the understanding and prediction of gravity induced brain shift based on patient repositioning. Methods: The MNI ICBM152 Average Brain Stereotaxic Registration Model was manually segmented and meshed in the Simpleware Scan IP software package. Using FEBio, suitable constitutive models were applied to each region. The model was then loaded to simulate supine-to-prone repositioning. Results: Displacement reached a maximum of approximately 2.4mm, with cortical displacement being concentrated in anterior regions. Conclusions: With good initial results, the future applications of this method appear promising.

This research is funded by the EPSRC and Renishaw Plc. as part of an iCase Studentship. The authors acknowledge the contributions of Rob Harrison, Renishaw Plc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amirnovin R, Williams ZM, Cosgrove GR, Eskandar EN (2006) Experience with microelectrode guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 58(1 Suppl):ONS96–ONS102 discussion ONS96

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmi H, Machado A, Deogaonkar M, Rezai A (2011) Intracranial air correlates with preoperative cerebral atrophy and stereotactic error during bilateral STN DBS surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 89(4):246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilger A, Dequidt J, Duriez C, Cotin S (2011) Biomechanical simulation of electrode migration for deep brain stimulation. Med Comput Comput Assist Interv Miccai 2011 6891:339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilger A, Bardinet E, Fernandez-Vidal S, Duriez C, Jannin P, Cotin S (2014a) Intra-operative registration for stereotactic procedures driven by a combined biomechanical brain and CSF model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8789, pp 76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilger A, Duriez C, Cotin S (2014b) Computation and visualization of risk assessment in deep brain stimulation planning. Stud Health Technol Inf 196:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cala LA, Thickbroom GW, Black JL, Collins DW, Mastaglia FL (1981) Brain density and cerebrospinal fluid space size: CT of normal volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias WJ, Fu KM, Frysinger RC (2007) Cortical and subcortical brain shift during stereotactic procedures. J Neurosurg 107(5):983–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamze N, Bilger A, Duriez C, Cotin S, Essert C (2015) Anticipation of brain shift in deep brain stimulation automatic planning. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:3635–3638

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill DLG, Maurer CR, Maciunas RJ, Barwise JA, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY (1998) Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy. Neurosurgery 43(3):514–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivan ME, Yarlagadda J, Saxena AP, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Sootsman WK et al (2014) Brain shift during bur hole-based procedures using interventional MRI. J Neurosurg 121(1):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RJ, Fuller GN, Abi-Said D, Lang FF, Gokaslan ZL, Shi WM et al (2001) Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas. Neuro Oncol 3(3):193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Lee JB, Leung LY, Zhang L, Yang KH, King AI (2006) Biomechanical response of the bovine pia-arachnoid complex to tensile loading at varying strain-rates. Stapp Car Crash J 50:637–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Ma C, Zhang L, Yang KH, King AI, Dong G et al (2007) Biomechanical response of the bovine pia-arachnoid complex to normal traction loading at varying strain rates. Stapp Car Crash J 51:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Yang KH, King AI (2011) Mechanical properties of bovine pia-arachnoid complex in shear. J Biomech 44(3):467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Mao H, Yang KH, King AI (2014) Constitutive modeling of pia-arachnoid complex. Ann Biomed Eng 42(4):812–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalia SK, Sankar T, Lozano AM (2013) Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 26(4):374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin E, Muravchick S, Gold MI (1981) Density of normal human cerebrospinal fluid and tetracaine solutions. Anesth Analg 60(11):814–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O, Woolley M, Johnson D, Rosser A, Barua NU, Bienemann AS et al (2016) Chronic, intermittent convection-enhanced delivery devices. J Neurosci Methods 259:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA (2012) FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 134(1):011005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihai LA, Chin L, Janmey PA, Goriely A (2015) A comparison of hyperelastic constitutive models applicable to brain and fat tissues. J R Soc Interface 12(110):0486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monea AG, Verpoest I, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, Goffin J, Depreitere B (2012) Assessment of relative brain-skull motion in quasistatic circumstances by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurotrauma 29(13):2305–2317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaudigel S, Preul C, Ugur T, Mentzel HJ, Witte OW, Tittgemeyer M et al (2010) Positional brain deformation visualized with magnetic resonance morphometry. Neurosurgery 66(2):376–384 discussion 84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noort R, Black MM, Martin TR, Meanley S (1981) A study of the uniaxial mechanical properties of human dura mater preserved in glycerol. Biomaterials 2(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. J. Bennion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bennion, N.J., Potts, M., Marshall, A.D., Anderson, S., Evans, S.L. (2018). Development of a Computational Model to Aid Prediction of Neurosurgical Brain Shift. In: Gefen, A., Weihs, D. (eds) Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59764-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59764-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59763-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59764-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics