Skip to main content

Rating Personalization Improves Accuracy: A Proportion-Based Baseline Estimate Model for Collaborative Recommendation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Collaborate Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2016)

Abstract

Baseline estimate is an important latent factor for recommendations. The current baseline estimate model is widely used by characterizing both items and users. However, it doesn’t consider different users’ rating criterions and results in predictions may be out of recommendation’s rating range. In this paper, we propose a novel baseline estimate model to improve the current performance, named PBEModel (Proportion-based Baseline Estimate Model), which uses rating proportions to compute the rating personalization. The PBEModel is modeled as a piecewise function according to different rating personalization. In order to verify this new baseline estimate, we apply it into SVD++, and propose a novel SVD++ model named PBESVD++. Experiments based on six real datasets show that the proposed PBEModel is rational and more accurate than current baseline estimate model, and the PBESVD++ has relatively higher prediction accuracy than SVD++.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M., et al.: Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. ACM 35(12), 61–70 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takács, G., Pilászy, I., Németh, B., et al.: Major components of the gravity recommendation system. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 9(2), 80–83 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarwar, B.M., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., et al.: Applying knowledge from KDD to recommender systems. Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis 1(612), 625–4002 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., et al.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 41(6), 391 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmann, T.: Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1), 89–115 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Koren, Y.: Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 426–434. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koren, Y.: Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Commun. ACM 53(4), 89–97 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, R., Verma, B.K., Rastogi, S.S.: Social popularity based SVD++ recommender system. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 87(14) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, G., Zhang, J., Yorke-Smith, N.: TrustSVD: collaborative filtering with both the explicit and implicit influence of user trust and of item ratings. In: AAAI, pp. 123–129 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, S., Ma, Y., Cheng, B., Yang, F.M.: Multi-dimensional QoS prediction for service recommendations. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 12 (2016). doi:10.1109/TSC.2016.2584058

  12. Ma, Y., Xin, X., Wang, S., Li, J., Sun, Q., Yang, F.: QoS evaluation for web service recommendation. China Commun. 12(4), 151–160 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, S., Zheng, Z., Wu, Z., Micheal, R.L., Yang, F.: Reputation measurement and malicious feedback rating prevention in web service recommendation system. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 8(5), 755–767 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., et al.: Recommender Systems: an Introduction. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guo, G.: LibRec: A Java Library for Rcommender Systems[EB/OL] (2016). http://www.librec.net

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61402097, No. 61572123 and No. 61502092; the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China under Grant No. 61225012 and No. 71325002; the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China under Grant No. 201602261; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. N151708005, and No. N151604001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenhua Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tan, Z., He, L., Li, H., Wang, X. (2017). Rating Personalization Improves Accuracy: A Proportion-Based Baseline Estimate Model for Collaborative Recommendation. In: Wang, S., Zhou, A. (eds) Collaborate Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. CollaborateCom 2016. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59288-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59288-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59287-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59288-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics