Abstract
Teachers’ professional knowledge is investigated in several national and international studies and is seen as a fundamental precondition for improved students’ learning. Though research indicates a connection between teachers’ professional knowledge and their students’ learning achievement, research lacks findings on the connection between teachers’ professional knowledge, their actual classroom action, and students’ learning outcome. The presented study focuses on the relationship between German secondary school chemistry teachers’ professional knowledge on the handling of technical language and their actual handling of technical language in class as well as their students’ learning achievement. Whereas findings confirm a significant general improvement in students’ content knowledge, they also indicate a significant connection between aspects of teachers’ professional knowledge and their students’ learning outcome. Moreover, first qualitative analyses show that teachers in classes with high learning achievement and teachers in classes with low learning achievement differ strongly in their handling of technical language. Teachers’ professional knowledge is related to an improved learning of their students, and especially students with low prior knowledge seem to benefit from teachers’ strong professional knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041.
Abell, S. K., Rogers, M. A. P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 77–93. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6.
Arnold, K.-H. (Ed.). (2007). Unterrichtsqualität und Fachdidaktik [quality of instruction and subject didactics]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Barke, H.-D. (2015). Learners ideas, misconceptions, and challange. In J. García-Martínez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education (pp. 395–420). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Bauer, K.-O. (2011). Modelle der Unterrichtsqualität [models of quality of instruction]. In K.-O. Bauer & N. Logemann (Eds.), Unterrichtsqualität und Fachdidaktische Forschung. Modelle und Instrumete zur Messung fachspezifischer Lernbedingungen und Kompetenzen [Quality of Instruction and Subject Didactis Research. Models and Instruments for Measuring Subject-Specific Learning Conditions and Competencies] (pp. 51–74). Münster: Waxmann.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.
Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2015). Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York: Routledge.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bußmann, H. (2002). ikon der Sprachwissenschaft [Dictionary of linguistics] (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Körner.
Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Does it matter what we measure? Domain-specific professional knowledge of physics teachers. Revue suisse des sciences de l’éducation, 37(3), 462–479.
Childs, P. E., Markic, S., & Ryan, M. C. (2015). The role of language in the teaching and learning of chemistry. In J. García-Martínez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education (pp. 395–420). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Clausen, M. (2002). Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmungs-, Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität [Quality of instruction: A question of perspective? Empirical analyses regarding congruity-, construct- and criteria validity]. Münster: Waxmann.
de Jong, O., & van Driel, J. H. (2005). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meaning of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 477–491.
Dollny, S. (2011). Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Testinstruments zur Erfassung des fachspezifischen Professionswissens von Chemielehrkräften [Development and evaluation of a testinstrument for measuring chemistry teachers’ subject specific professional knowledge]. Berlin: Logos.
Eunson, B. (2012). Communicating in the 21st century (3rd ed.). Milton: Wiley.
Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Dorfner, T., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2016). Effects of cognitive activation in biology lessons on students’ situational interest and achievement. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9517-y.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.
Grucza, S. (2012). Fachsprachenlinguistik [Linguistics of technical languages]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Johnstone, A. H., & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 19–29.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F. J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201. doi:10.1177/0022487110388664.
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers – Results from the COACTIV project. New York: Springer.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Özcan, N. (2013). Zum Einfluss der Fachsprache auf die Leistung im Fach Chemie: Eine Förderstudie zur Fachsprache im Chemieunterricht [The influence of technical language on performance in the subject chemistry. A study to foster technical language in chemistry classes]. Berlin: Logos.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2007). Revisiting the conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.
Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2010). Is Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8.
Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2012). Die professionelle Kompetenz angehender Physiklehrkräfte in verschiedenen Ausbildungsformen. [The professional competency of perspective physics teachers in different forms of qualification]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15(1), 111–143. doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0259-y.
Roelcke, T. (2005). Fachsprachen [Technical languages] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Schmidt.
Ropohl, M. (2010). Modellierung von Schülerkompetenzen im Basiskonzept chemische reaktion. Entwicklung und analyse von testaufgaben [Modelling of students’ competencies in the basic concept chemical reaction. Development and analysis of test-items]. Berlin: Logos.
Schmölzer-Eibinger. (2013). Sprache als medium des Lernens im Fach [language as medium of learning in subjects]. In M. Becker-Mrotzek (Ed.), Sprache im Fach. Sprachlichkeit und fachliches Lernen [Language as medium of learning in subjects] (pp. 25–41). Münster: Waxmann.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Publishing Group, 57(1), 1–23.
Strübe, M., Tröger, H., Tepner, O., & Sumfleth, E. (2014). Development of a pedagogical content knowledge test of chemistry language and models. Educatión Química, 25(3), 380–390.
Taber, K. S. (2015). Exploring the language(s) of chemistry education. Chemical Education Research and Practice. doi:10.1039/c5rp90003d.
Tepner, O., & Dollny, S. (2014). Measuring chemistry teachers’ content knowledge: Is it correlated to pedagogical content knowledge? In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education. 9th ESERA conference selected contributions (pp. 243–254). Dordrecht: Springer.
Yore, L. D. (2012). Science literacy for all: More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag! In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and Challenges in science education research (pp. 5–24). Dordrecht: Springer.
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. doi:10.1080/09500690305018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tröger, H., Sumfleth, E., Tepner, O. (2017). Chemistry Teachers’ Professional Knowledge, Classroom Action, and Students’ Learning: The Relevance of Technical Language. In: Hahl, K., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Uitto, A., Lavonen, J. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58684-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58685-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)