Abstract
This paper compares crisis narratives and descriptions of the Anthropocene to the institutional and substantive changes that have been brought on the way by the creation of the Banking and Energy Union in the EU. From the aims alone, it becomes clear that both the Banking and the Energy Union were born out of the political desire to make each of the systems more robust, but that the visions themselves fall short of significant substantive change or a reinvention of the system. Whilst the explanation of this is almost entirely political, some of the reasons also have to do with the functioning and the mechanisms of the law. The law, in particular public law, stands and falls with formal legal principles, has a particular difficulty dealing with, defining and coming up with solutions for risk whilst staying true to formal principles such as certainty and proportionality. Risk detection requires the introduction of new procedures and agencies (institutions). The mitigation of risks requires a multicontexual and multipolar balancing of rights and interests. Both proceduralism and a complex act of balancing can guarantee the integrity of law and its methodology, but they do not bring about substantive change. This paper sees a third method of risk mitigation in the creation of new institutions (such as the Energy Union, but also the United Nation or NATO). This is perceived as the creation of something that is larger than the threat it addresses (‘super structures’), but substantively ends up enforcing little more than the “lowest common denominator”. This paper, therefore, suggests abandoning such methodological approaches and changing the principles on which the EU and the law of the common market is based instead. It proposes a “first best” and a “second best” solution. The first is the introduction of new and prevalent aims and principles and an actual change of the economic system. The second (though more likely solution) proposes a mere extension of the goals of the European union, which results in a careful act of balance between more sustainability and the development of the liberal common market project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Admati A, Hellwig M (2013) The banker’s new clothes: what’s wrong with banking and what to do about it. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Alexy R (2002) A theory of constitutional rights (trans: Rivers J, 2012). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Alexy R (2003) Fundamental right, balancing, and rationality. Ratio Juris 16(2):131–140
Badiou A (2012) Ethics: an understanding of evil verso, London
Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne Nomos Baden-Baden
Beck U (2009) Critical theory of world risk society: a cosmopolitan vision. Constellations 16(1):3–22
Chakrabarty D (2009) The climate of history: four theses. Crit Inq 35:197–222
DiFabio U (1994) Risikoentscheidungen im Rechtsstaat: Zum Wandel der Dogmatik im öffentlichen Recht, insbesondere am Beispiel der Arzneimittelüberwachung Mohr Siebeck Heidelberg
Douzinas C (2013) Philosophy and resistance in the crisis, Greece and the future of Europe. Wiley, London
Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Finkestscher W, Hacker P, Podzsun R (2013) FairEconomy, crisis, culture, competition and the role of the law. Springer, Berlin
Fullerton J (2015) Regenerative capitalism, how universal principles and patterns will shape our new economy
Johnston A, Van der Marel E (2013) Ad Lucem? Interpreting the new EU Energy Provision, and in particular the meaning of article 194 (2) TFEU. Eur Energy Environ Law Rev 22:181–199
Klein N (2014) This changes everything, capitalism vs. the climate. Simon and Schuster, New York
Ladeur K-H (2004) Das Umweltrecht in der Wissensgesellschaft. Von der Gefahrenabwehr zum Risikomanagement, 1995. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, p 15
Lastra RM, Wood G (2009) The causes of 2007–09 nature, causes and reactions. J Int Econ Law 13(3):531–550
Lepsius KR (1995) Risikosteuerung durchVerwaltungsrecht. Ermöglichung oder Begrenzung von Innovationen? VVDStRL 63(2004):264
Manson P (2015) The end of capitalism has begun. The Guardian (Online 17.7.2015)
Marazzi C (2010) The violence of financial capitalism. Semiotext(e), Los Angeles
Paloniitty T (2015) Taking aims seriously: how legal ecology affects judicial decision-making. J Hum Rights Environ 6(1):55–74
Poscher R (2012) The principle theory: how many theories and what is their merit? In: Klatt M (ed) Institutionalizing reason. Perspectives on the legal philosophy of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press
Robinson NA (2014) Fundamental principles of law for the anthropocene? Environ Policy Law 44(1–2)
Sjåfjell B, Wiesbrock A (2015) The greening of European business under EU law: taking article 11 TFEU seriously. Routledge, London
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011a) The anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos Trans Royal Soc 369:842–867
Steffen W, Persson A, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, Molina M, Ramanathan V, Rockstrom J, Scheffer M, Schellnhuber HJ, Svedin U (2011b) The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40:739–761
Sunstein C (2013) The storrs lectures: behavioural economics and paternalism. The Yale Law Journal 122(79):1826–1898
Weiler JHH (2012) In the face of crisis: input legitimacy, output legitimacy and the political messianism of European integration. J Eur Integr 34(7):825–841
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mendelsohn, J., Bygojordet Sveen, T. (2018). Risks, Crisis and the European Union Law: Implications and Parallels for Addressing Financial, Energy Security and Environmental Catastrophe. In: McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) Balancing Individualism and Collectivism. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58014-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58014-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58013-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58014-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)