Skip to main content

Is There a Causal Loop Which Avoids a First Cause?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
God and Ultimate Origins

Part of the book series: Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion ((PFPR))

  • 666 Accesses

Abstract

I examine whether there exists a causal loop which avoids a First Cause. I distinguish between a causal loop in dynamic and static time and between an open and closed loop, and explain that a dynamic loop and an open loop does not avoid a First Cause. I note that a static closed loop cosmological model has been proposed by Gott and Li (Physical Review D 58:023501–1, 1998), and that we do not have adequate evidence for thinking that such a loop exists. I discuss the Bootstrap Paradox which shows that this type of causal loop is viciously circular and metaphysically impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carroll, Sean. 2010. From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, William Lane. 2000a. The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, Synthese Library 293. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, William Lane. 2000b. The Tenseless Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, Synthese Library 294. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, William Lane, and James Sinclair. 2009. The Kalam Cosmological Argument. In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, ed. William Lane Craig and J.P. Moreland. Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, Bradley. 2013. Time. Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/time/. Accessed 5 July 2013.

  • Earman, John. 1967. On Going Backward in Time. Philosophy of Science 34: 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John, and Christian Wüthrich. 2010. Time Machines. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/time-machine/.

  • Ellis, George. 2014. Time Really Exists! The Evolving Block Universe. Euresis 7(2014): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faye, Jan. 2010. Backward Causation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/causation-backwards/.

  • Gödel, Kurt. 1949. A Remark about the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy. In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gott III, Richard. 1991. Closed Timelike Curves Produced by Pairs of Moving Cosmic Strings—Exact Solutions. Physical Review Letters 66: 1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott III, Richard, and Li-Xin Li. 1998. Can the Universe Create Itself? Physical Review D 58: 023501–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, Richard. 2004. No End in Sight: Causal Loops in Philosophy, Physics and Fiction. Synthese 141: 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, Stephen. 1992. Chronology Protection Conjecture. Physical Review D 46: 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., and M. Nelson. 2001. Presentists Should Believe in Time-Travel. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-H., et al. 2000. A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser. Physical Review Letters 84: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1976. The Paradoxes of Time Travel. American Philosophical Quarterly 13: 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Seth, et al. 2011. Closed Timelike Curves via Postselection: Theory and Experimental Test of Consistency. Physical Review Letters 106: 040403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, Robin. 1996. Arguing for Atheism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Ulrich. 2012. Explaining Causal Loops. Analysis 72: 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monton, Bradley. 2003. Presentists Can Believe in Closed Timelike Curves. Analysis 63: 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monton, Bradley. 2007. Time Travel Without Causal Loops. Philosophical Quarterly 59: 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Gustavo, and Daniela Pérez. 2012. New Remarks on the Cosmological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72: 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Jonathan. 2008. The Metaphysics of Causation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/causation-metaphysics/.

  • Vilenkin, Alexander. 2006. Many Worlds in One. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Steven, and Rickles, Dean. 2011. Quantum Gravity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/quantum-gravity/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Ter Ern Loke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loke, A.T.E. (2017). Is There a Causal Loop Which Avoids a First Cause?. In: God and Ultimate Origins. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57547-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics