Skip to main content

Learning Research in the Planetarium Prior to 1990

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research on Teaching Astronomy in the Planetarium

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Astronomy ((BRIEFSASTRON))

  • 435 Accesses

Abstract

Scholars through the centuries have ardently endeavored to find the best teaching methods to efficiently and effectively transfer vast amounts of accumulated star knowledge to their upcoming generation of sky watchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbatantuono, B. P. (1995). Armand Spitz-Seller of Stars. The Planetarian, 24(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrendt, M. H. (1966). Planetarium survey. Paper presented at the Great Lakes Planetarium Association Meeting at the Cincinnati Museum of Natural History, October 14, 1966, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akey, J. M. (1973). The behavioral selection of planetarium concepts appropriate for second grade students. Ed.D. Dissertation. Greely: University of Northern Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglini, D. W. (1971). An experimental study of the science curriculum improvement study involving fourth graders’ ability to understand concepts of relative position and motion using the planetarium as a testing device. Ph.D. Dissertation. Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1974). Differential aptitude test (5th ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. E. (1980). The development and testing of a participatory planetarium unit employing projective astronomy concepts and utilizing the karplus learning cycle, student model manipulation and student drawing with eighth-grade students. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Akron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondurant, R. L. (1975). An assessment of certain skills possessed by fifth-grade students used to successfully identify constellations in a planetarium. Ph.D. Dissertation. Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, A. K., & Bousfield, W. A. (1966). Measurement of clustering and of sequential constancies in repeated free recall. Psychological Reports, 19(3), 935–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching. American Educational Research Association. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, M. R. (1973). A fifty year anniversary of a two thousand year dream: The history of the planetarium. Planetarian, 2(3), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, J. (1967). Getting acquainted with the GLPA. Great Lakes Planetarium Association Newsletter, 4, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronholm, L. C., & Lansing, E. A. (1955). what are the educational values in planned field trips? NASSP Bulletin, 39(210), 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, J. T. (1967). An analysis of planetarium program content and the classification of demonstrators’ questions. Doctoral Dissertation. Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, R. N. (1960). The use of the planetarium in the teaching of earth and space sciences. Chadds Ford, PA: Spitz Laboratories. ASIN: B001KSTVMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edoff, J. D. (1982). An experimental study of the effectiveness of manipulative use in planetarium astronomy lessons for fifth and eighth grade students. Ed.D. Dissertation. Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, A. J. (1963). A Study of Planetariums and Planetarium Programming. Ohio: Senior Honors Project, Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. H. (1950). A report on a school planetarium: Its design, its development as a group project, its utility as an instructional aid and its program in school community relations (Master’s thesis). Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. C. (1958). An experiment in the development and use of educational field trips. Ed.D. Dissertation. University of Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1977). An experimental comparison of the effectiveness of a traditional type planetarium program and a Participatory Type Planetarium Program. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1980). Traditional planetarium programming versus participatory planetarium programming. School Science and Mathematics, 80(3), 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1973). Learning and instructional sequence. Review of Research in Education, 1, 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, T. W. (1981). A comparison of effectiveness of advance organizers and clustering singly and in combination upon learning in the planetarium. Doctoral Dissertation. Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbert, E. H. (1972). A standardized test in collegiate descriptive astronomy on selected concepts which can be demonstrated in the planetarium. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, R. R. (1976). The developing and field testing of an instrument using the planetarium to evaluate the attainment of the concept of annual motion. Paper presented to the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (based on his Doctoral Dissertation from Georgia State University), April 23, 1976, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, L. A. (1970). A brief historical account and introduction to the Earth Science Curriculum Project. The High School Journal, 53(4), 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for the development of reasoning. Research in Science Education, 10(1), 1–9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Korey, R. A. (1963). Contributions of planetariums to elementary education. Doctoral Dissertation. Fordham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, G. L. (1980). Student Achievement and Attitudes in Astronomy: An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of a Traditional “Star Show” Planetarium Program and a “Participatory Oriented Planetarium” Program. Ed.D. Dissertation. Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, G. L., & Bruce, M. H. (1982). Student achievement and attitudes in astronomy: An experimental comparison of two planetarium programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 53–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T. D. (1961). A planetarium demonstration in the classroom. Curator: The Museum Journal 4(4), 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M. K. (1964). The planetarium and space science in the elementary school. Science Education, 48(1), 28–31.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortell, E.D. (1977). The value of the planetarium as an instructional device. Doctoral Dissertation. Nova University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1970). Is the planetarium a more effective teaching device than the combination of the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe? School Science and Mathematics, 70(6), 487–492.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1972). An outline for the education of a K-12 planetarium teacher. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1(3), 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1973). The planetarium versus the classroom—an inquiry into earlier implications. School Science and Mathematics, 73(7), 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1976). Can first-graders be taught night and day in the planetarium? School Science and Mathematics, 76(7), 545–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, V. (Spitz), & Towne, J. (2013). Who was Armand Spitz? Planetarian 42(4), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridky, R. W. (1973). A study of planetarium effectiveness on student achievement, perceptions and retention. Doctoral Dissertation. Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridky, R. W. (1974). A study of planetarium effectiveness on student achievement, perceptions and retention. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL. Available online at: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED091207.

  • Ridky, R. W. (1975). The mystique effect of the planetarium. School Science and Mathematics, 75(6), 505–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rischbieter, M. O, Ryan, J. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (1993). Use of microethnographic strategies to analyze some affective aspects of learning-cycle—based mini-courses in paleontology for teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education 41(3), 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemergy, J. C. (1967). An experimental study of the effectiveness of a planetarium in teaching selected astronomical phenomena to sixth-grade children. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, D., & Friedman, A. (1976). Self-discovery in astronomy for the public. Sky and Telescope, 52, 254.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater et al. (2015). Conducting astronomy education research: an astronomers’ guide. Hilo, Hawai’i: Pono Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. A. (1966). An experimental comparison of two techniques (planetarium lecture-demonstration and classroom lecture-demonstration) of teaching selected astronomical concepts to sixth grade students. Ed.D. Dissertation. Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W. (1973). The Planetarium in Education: An Experimental Study of the Attainment of Perceived Goals. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, D. E. (1965). Effects of the use of the planetarium upon the development of spatial concepts among selected sixth grade students in Elgin (Master’s thesis), Northern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. L. C. (1968). Effectiveness of the planetarium and different methods of its utilization in teaching astronomy. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slater, T.F., Tatge, C.B. (2017). Learning Research in the Planetarium Prior to 1990. In: Research on Teaching Astronomy in the Planetarium. SpringerBriefs in Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57202-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics